Short-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma

Yoichiro Shinohara, Hideo Akiyama, Mikiya Magori, Shoji Kishi Department of Ophthalmology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) who u...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shinohara Y, Akiyama H, Magori M, Kishi S
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/29245abc2d23411f88d643497476a753
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:29245abc2d23411f88d643497476a753
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:29245abc2d23411f88d643497476a7532021-12-02T01:49:48ZShort-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/29245abc2d23411f88d643497476a7532017-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/short-term-outcomes-after-ex-press-implantation-versus-trabeculectomy--peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Yoichiro Shinohara, Hideo Akiyama, Mikiya Magori, Shoji Kishi Department of Ophthalmology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) who underwent trabeculectomy or EX-PRESS implantation and to identify predictors of successful EX-PRESS implantation. Methods: The study designed as a retrospective observational analysis and was set in a single tertiary center. Eighty-nine patients (89 eyes) with NVG, were treated using trabeculectomy alone (Trab group; n=39) or EX-PRESS implantation (EX group; n=50). All patients with a history of glaucoma surgery were excluded. The main outcome measures were postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), number of medications, complications, additional therapy, and success rate. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 4.6 months in the Trab group and 4.2 months in the EX group. There was no significant difference in IOP between the groups except at 1-month follow-up (P=0.045). The number of patients with early postoperative hypotony, a shallow anterior chamber, hyphema, or anterior chamber irrigation was significantly lower in the EX group than in the Trab group (P=0.016, 0.008, 0.019, and 0.014, respectively). The other outcomes, ie, VA, number of medications, and success rate, were similar between the two groups. In the EX group, the success rate was significantly lower in 15 patients with a history of vitrectomy compared to that in 35 patients without a history of vitrectomy (P=0.047). Conclusion: Implantation of an EX-PRESS device may be more effective and safer than trabeculectomy alone in patients with NVG. However, a history of vitrectomy may affect the surgical success rate when using EX-PRESS. Keywords: trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS, neovascular glaucoma, surgery, tube shuntShinohara YAkiyama HMagori MKishi SDove Medical PressarticletrabeculectomyEX-PRESSneovascular glaucomasurgerytube shuntOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 11, Pp 2207-2213 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic trabeculectomy
EX-PRESS
neovascular glaucoma
surgery
tube shunt
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle trabeculectomy
EX-PRESS
neovascular glaucoma
surgery
tube shunt
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Shinohara Y
Akiyama H
Magori M
Kishi S
Short-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma
description Yoichiro Shinohara, Hideo Akiyama, Mikiya Magori, Shoji Kishi Department of Ophthalmology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) who underwent trabeculectomy or EX-PRESS implantation and to identify predictors of successful EX-PRESS implantation. Methods: The study designed as a retrospective observational analysis and was set in a single tertiary center. Eighty-nine patients (89 eyes) with NVG, were treated using trabeculectomy alone (Trab group; n=39) or EX-PRESS implantation (EX group; n=50). All patients with a history of glaucoma surgery were excluded. The main outcome measures were postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), number of medications, complications, additional therapy, and success rate. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 4.6 months in the Trab group and 4.2 months in the EX group. There was no significant difference in IOP between the groups except at 1-month follow-up (P=0.045). The number of patients with early postoperative hypotony, a shallow anterior chamber, hyphema, or anterior chamber irrigation was significantly lower in the EX group than in the Trab group (P=0.016, 0.008, 0.019, and 0.014, respectively). The other outcomes, ie, VA, number of medications, and success rate, were similar between the two groups. In the EX group, the success rate was significantly lower in 15 patients with a history of vitrectomy compared to that in 35 patients without a history of vitrectomy (P=0.047). Conclusion: Implantation of an EX-PRESS device may be more effective and safer than trabeculectomy alone in patients with NVG. However, a history of vitrectomy may affect the surgical success rate when using EX-PRESS. Keywords: trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS, neovascular glaucoma, surgery, tube shunt
format article
author Shinohara Y
Akiyama H
Magori M
Kishi S
author_facet Shinohara Y
Akiyama H
Magori M
Kishi S
author_sort Shinohara Y
title Short-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma
title_short Short-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma
title_full Short-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma
title_fullStr Short-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Short-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma
title_sort short-term outcomes after ex-press implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/29245abc2d23411f88d643497476a753
work_keys_str_mv AT shinoharay shorttermoutcomesafterexpressimplantationversustrabeculectomyaloneinpatientswithneovascularglaucoma
AT akiyamah shorttermoutcomesafterexpressimplantationversustrabeculectomyaloneinpatientswithneovascularglaucoma
AT magorim shorttermoutcomesafterexpressimplantationversustrabeculectomyaloneinpatientswithneovascularglaucoma
AT kishis shorttermoutcomesafterexpressimplantationversustrabeculectomyaloneinpatientswithneovascularglaucoma
_version_ 1718402822795427840