The Muslim Question in Canada
Considering that in the 2015 Federal Election, candidates were often talking about Muslims and their relationship to Canada, whether from an empathetic and supportive position or from a negative and racist position, Kazemipur’s book could not be more welcome and timely. While many of us in the Musl...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2945da51e5174b6cb6ed66760386ffc3 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Considering that in the 2015 Federal Election, candidates were often talking
about Muslims and their relationship to Canada, whether from an empathetic
and supportive position or from a negative and racist position, Kazemipur’s
book could not be more welcome and timely. While many of us in the Muslim
community wish we were not part of a “question” that needed debating and
discussing, Kazemipur’s title is, regrettably, very consciously and aptly chosen,
for it refers back to the debates in Europe at the turn of the nineteenth
century about the “Jewish Question.” The author notes, as others have, that
contemporary debates about “illiberal Muslims” with strange customs who
cannot and will not “integrate” into Canadian society mirror those about Jews
in that era (pp. 7-8), and proposes to study this particular community through
a much needed sociological lens. The book is very well-written, accessible,
methodologically and theoretically sophisticated, and enormously useful –
anyone who wants to talk about the Muslim experience in Canada will find it
insightful and indispensable for coming to terms with day-to-day realities of
those experiences.
Kazemipur rightly points out that this “Muslim” question is not fruitfully
approached through the paradigm proposed by Samuel Huntington and likeminded
scholars, namely, “culture,” which forms the basis of a “Muslim exceptionalism”
(p. 5) and explains the “inability” of Muslims to integrate into
western democracies. This approach, he argues, “grossly oversimplifies a
Book Reviews 127
complex and multifaceted problem” and “removes the possibility that the
mainstream population might have to take some moral responsibility for it”
(p. 5). Integration is a relationship among different peoples. Thus he also
points out, although not until the end of the book, that trying to understand
these Muslims’ situation by focusing upon Islamic theology is less useful than ...
|
|---|