Not All Slurs are Equal
Slurs are typically defined as conveying contempt based on group-membership. However, here I argue that they are not a unitary group. First, I describe two dimensions of variation among derogatives: how targets are identified, and how offensive the term is. This supports the typical definition of s...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Language: | EN FR IT |
| Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/29cffaa2c5464617b34e7e5f38d70e00 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Slurs are typically defined as conveying contempt based on group-membership. However, here I argue that they are not a unitary group. First, I describe two dimensions of variation among derogatives: how targets are identified, and how offensive the term is. This supports the typical definition of slurs as opposed to other derogatives. I then highlight problems with this definition, mainly caused by variable offence across slur words. In the process I discuss how major theories of slurs can account for variable offence, and conclude that contempt based on group-membership doesn’t cover all the data. I finish by noting that the most offensive slurs are those that target oppressed groups. I claim it is oppression that underpins most offence, and that beyond this offensive property, some slurs are actively used to oppress.
|
|---|