The impact of different thresholds on optical coherence tomography angiography images binarization and quantitative metrics

Abstract Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) provides several data regarding the status of retinal capillaries. This information can be further enlarged by employing quantitative metrics, such as vessel density (VD). A mandatory preliminary step of OCTA quantification is image binarizati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alessandro Arrigo, Emanuela Aragona, Andrea Saladino, Alessia Amato, Francesco Bandello, Maurizio Battaglia Parodi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2a131e6e19fa41459c6815e3523f63bb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2a131e6e19fa41459c6815e3523f63bb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2a131e6e19fa41459c6815e3523f63bb2021-12-02T17:03:50ZThe impact of different thresholds on optical coherence tomography angiography images binarization and quantitative metrics10.1038/s41598-021-94333-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/2a131e6e19fa41459c6815e3523f63bb2021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94333-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) provides several data regarding the status of retinal capillaries. This information can be further enlarged by employing quantitative metrics, such as vessel density (VD). A mandatory preliminary step of OCTA quantification is image binarization, a procedure used to highlight retinal capillaries on empty background. Although several binarization thresholds exist, no consensus is reached about the thresholding technique to be used. In this study, we tested thirteen binarization thresholds on a dataset made by thirty volunteers. The aim was to assess the impact of binarization techniques on: (I) detection of retinal capillaries, assessed by the calculation of overlapping percentages between binarized and original images; (II) quantitative OCTA metrics, including VD, vessel tortuosity (VT) and vessel dispersion (Vdisp); (III) foveal avascular zone (FAZ) detection. Our findings showed Huang, Li, Mean and Percentile as highly reliable binarization thresholds (p < 0.05), whereas the worst binarization thresholds were Intermodes, MaxEntropy, RenylEntropy and Yen (p < 0.05). All the thresholds variably underestimated VD metric and FAZ detection, with respect to the original OCTA images, whereas VT and Vdisp turned out to be more stable. The usage of a Fixed threshold resulted extremely useful to reduce VD and FAZ underestimations, although bound to operators’ experience.Alessandro ArrigoEmanuela AragonaAndrea SaladinoAlessia AmatoFrancesco BandelloMaurizio Battaglia ParodiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Alessandro Arrigo
Emanuela Aragona
Andrea Saladino
Alessia Amato
Francesco Bandello
Maurizio Battaglia Parodi
The impact of different thresholds on optical coherence tomography angiography images binarization and quantitative metrics
description Abstract Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) provides several data regarding the status of retinal capillaries. This information can be further enlarged by employing quantitative metrics, such as vessel density (VD). A mandatory preliminary step of OCTA quantification is image binarization, a procedure used to highlight retinal capillaries on empty background. Although several binarization thresholds exist, no consensus is reached about the thresholding technique to be used. In this study, we tested thirteen binarization thresholds on a dataset made by thirty volunteers. The aim was to assess the impact of binarization techniques on: (I) detection of retinal capillaries, assessed by the calculation of overlapping percentages between binarized and original images; (II) quantitative OCTA metrics, including VD, vessel tortuosity (VT) and vessel dispersion (Vdisp); (III) foveal avascular zone (FAZ) detection. Our findings showed Huang, Li, Mean and Percentile as highly reliable binarization thresholds (p < 0.05), whereas the worst binarization thresholds were Intermodes, MaxEntropy, RenylEntropy and Yen (p < 0.05). All the thresholds variably underestimated VD metric and FAZ detection, with respect to the original OCTA images, whereas VT and Vdisp turned out to be more stable. The usage of a Fixed threshold resulted extremely useful to reduce VD and FAZ underestimations, although bound to operators’ experience.
format article
author Alessandro Arrigo
Emanuela Aragona
Andrea Saladino
Alessia Amato
Francesco Bandello
Maurizio Battaglia Parodi
author_facet Alessandro Arrigo
Emanuela Aragona
Andrea Saladino
Alessia Amato
Francesco Bandello
Maurizio Battaglia Parodi
author_sort Alessandro Arrigo
title The impact of different thresholds on optical coherence tomography angiography images binarization and quantitative metrics
title_short The impact of different thresholds on optical coherence tomography angiography images binarization and quantitative metrics
title_full The impact of different thresholds on optical coherence tomography angiography images binarization and quantitative metrics
title_fullStr The impact of different thresholds on optical coherence tomography angiography images binarization and quantitative metrics
title_full_unstemmed The impact of different thresholds on optical coherence tomography angiography images binarization and quantitative metrics
title_sort impact of different thresholds on optical coherence tomography angiography images binarization and quantitative metrics
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2a131e6e19fa41459c6815e3523f63bb
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandroarrigo theimpactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT emanuelaaragona theimpactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT andreasaladino theimpactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT alessiaamato theimpactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT francescobandello theimpactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT mauriziobattagliaparodi theimpactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT alessandroarrigo impactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT emanuelaaragona impactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT andreasaladino impactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT alessiaamato impactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT francescobandello impactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
AT mauriziobattagliaparodi impactofdifferentthresholdsonopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyimagesbinarizationandquantitativemetrics
_version_ 1718381837830586368