Open to Open? An Exploration of Textbook Preferences and Strategies to Offset Textbook Costs for Online Versus On-Campus Students

As open textbook initiatives are on the rise, a burgeoning literature has begun exploring student perceptions of openly licensed textbooks used in higher education. Most of this research has lacked consideration of potential differences in the perceptions of online and on-campus students and has fa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talea Anderson, Carrie Cuttler
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2aaf28644c6049a7aff70e0d5772b630
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2aaf28644c6049a7aff70e0d5772b630
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2aaf28644c6049a7aff70e0d5772b6302021-12-02T17:16:05ZOpen to Open? An Exploration of Textbook Preferences and Strategies to Offset Textbook Costs for Online Versus On-Campus Students10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.41411492-3831https://doaj.org/article/2aaf28644c6049a7aff70e0d5772b6302020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/4141https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831 As open textbook initiatives are on the rise, a burgeoning literature has begun exploring student perceptions of openly licensed textbooks used in higher education. Most of this research has lacked consideration of potential differences in the perceptions of online and on-campus students and has failed to include a control group of students using traditional textbooks. Therefore, the authors employed a 2 x 2 design to directly compare perceptions of online students with on-campus students assigned either open or traditional textbooks. Students (N = 925) enrolled in multiple sections of psychology courses at a midsized R1 institution completed a survey on their perceptions of their particular book’s format and features, as well as strategies they typically employ to offset the cost of expensive course materials. The results revealed that online and on-campus students report disparate strategies for offsetting the high costs of textbooks, different preferences in textbook formats (print versus digital versus both) when cost is not a factor, and differences in their ratings of the importance of various textbook features. Moreover, the results indicate that the use of open textbooks may increase preference for free digital textbooks over paid printed textbooks. Based on these results, the authors suggest that campuses might consider providing customized support to different student populations as open textbook initiatives gain in popularity on university campuses. Additionally, they suggest that prior exposure to open textbooks may increase students’ willingness to use openly licensed materials in future courses. They recommend future research on this question, using a longitudinal within-subjects designs.   Talea AndersonCarrie CuttlerAthabasca University Pressarticleopen textbooksdistance educationopen educational resourcesonline educationSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 21, Iss 1 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic open textbooks
distance education
open educational resources
online education
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle open textbooks
distance education
open educational resources
online education
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Talea Anderson
Carrie Cuttler
Open to Open? An Exploration of Textbook Preferences and Strategies to Offset Textbook Costs for Online Versus On-Campus Students
description As open textbook initiatives are on the rise, a burgeoning literature has begun exploring student perceptions of openly licensed textbooks used in higher education. Most of this research has lacked consideration of potential differences in the perceptions of online and on-campus students and has failed to include a control group of students using traditional textbooks. Therefore, the authors employed a 2 x 2 design to directly compare perceptions of online students with on-campus students assigned either open or traditional textbooks. Students (N = 925) enrolled in multiple sections of psychology courses at a midsized R1 institution completed a survey on their perceptions of their particular book’s format and features, as well as strategies they typically employ to offset the cost of expensive course materials. The results revealed that online and on-campus students report disparate strategies for offsetting the high costs of textbooks, different preferences in textbook formats (print versus digital versus both) when cost is not a factor, and differences in their ratings of the importance of various textbook features. Moreover, the results indicate that the use of open textbooks may increase preference for free digital textbooks over paid printed textbooks. Based on these results, the authors suggest that campuses might consider providing customized support to different student populations as open textbook initiatives gain in popularity on university campuses. Additionally, they suggest that prior exposure to open textbooks may increase students’ willingness to use openly licensed materials in future courses. They recommend future research on this question, using a longitudinal within-subjects designs.  
format article
author Talea Anderson
Carrie Cuttler
author_facet Talea Anderson
Carrie Cuttler
author_sort Talea Anderson
title Open to Open? An Exploration of Textbook Preferences and Strategies to Offset Textbook Costs for Online Versus On-Campus Students
title_short Open to Open? An Exploration of Textbook Preferences and Strategies to Offset Textbook Costs for Online Versus On-Campus Students
title_full Open to Open? An Exploration of Textbook Preferences and Strategies to Offset Textbook Costs for Online Versus On-Campus Students
title_fullStr Open to Open? An Exploration of Textbook Preferences and Strategies to Offset Textbook Costs for Online Versus On-Campus Students
title_full_unstemmed Open to Open? An Exploration of Textbook Preferences and Strategies to Offset Textbook Costs for Online Versus On-Campus Students
title_sort open to open? an exploration of textbook preferences and strategies to offset textbook costs for online versus on-campus students
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/2aaf28644c6049a7aff70e0d5772b630
work_keys_str_mv AT taleaanderson opentoopenanexplorationoftextbookpreferencesandstrategiestooffsettextbookcostsforonlineversusoncampusstudents
AT carriecuttler opentoopenanexplorationoftextbookpreferencesandstrategiestooffsettextbookcostsforonlineversusoncampusstudents
_version_ 1718381190709248000