Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerat...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jan P Vandenbroucke, Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, Peter C Gøtzsche, Cynthia D Mulrow, Stuart J Pocock, Charles Poole, James J Schlesselman, Matthias Egger, STROBE Initiative |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/2ac6ac825ae841fc8c6fef9b56003f12 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
by: Erik von Elm, et al.
Published: (2007) -
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology--Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE Statement.
by: Valentina Gallo, et al.
Published: (2011) -
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
by: Alessandro Liberati, et al.
Published: (2009) -
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement.
by: Julian Little, et al.
Published: (2009) -
CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration.
by: Sally Hopewell, et al.
Published: (2008)