Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk
Abstract We compared accuracy for breast cancer (BC) risk stratification of a new fully automated system (DenSeeMammo—DSM) for breast density (BD) assessment to a non-inferiority threshold based on radiologists’ visual assessment. Pooled analysis was performed on 14,267 2D mammograms collected from...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d1149 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d1149 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d11492021-12-02T18:37:10ZValidation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk10.1038/s41598-021-99433-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d11492021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99433-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We compared accuracy for breast cancer (BC) risk stratification of a new fully automated system (DenSeeMammo—DSM) for breast density (BD) assessment to a non-inferiority threshold based on radiologists’ visual assessment. Pooled analysis was performed on 14,267 2D mammograms collected from women aged 48–55 years who underwent BC screening within three studies: RETomo, Florence study and PROCAS. BD was expressed through clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification. Women in BI-RADS D category had a 2.6 (95% CI 1.5–4.4) and a 3.6 (95% CI 1.4–9.3) times higher risk of incident and interval cancer, respectively, than women in the two lowest BD categories. The ability of DSM to predict risk of incident cancer was non-inferior to radiologists’ visual assessment as both point estimate and lower bound of 95% CI (AUC 0.589; 95% CI 0.580–0.597) were above the predefined visual assessment threshold (AUC 0.571). AUC for interval (AUC 0.631; 95% CI 0.623–0.639) cancers was even higher. BD assessed with new fully automated method is positively associated with BC risk and is not inferior to radiologists’ visual assessment. It is an even stronger marker of interval cancer, confirming an appreciable masking effect of BD that reduces mammography sensitivity.Paolo Giorgi RossiOlivera DjuricValerie HélinSusan AstleyPaola MantelliniAndrea NitrosiElaine F. HarknessEmilien GauthierDonella PulitiCorinne BalleyguierCamille BaronFiona J. GilbertAndré GrivegnéePierpaolo PattaciniStefan MichielsSuzette DelalogeNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Paolo Giorgi Rossi Olivera Djuric Valerie Hélin Susan Astley Paola Mantellini Andrea Nitrosi Elaine F. Harkness Emilien Gauthier Donella Puliti Corinne Balleyguier Camille Baron Fiona J. Gilbert André Grivegnée Pierpaolo Pattacini Stefan Michiels Suzette Delaloge Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk |
description |
Abstract We compared accuracy for breast cancer (BC) risk stratification of a new fully automated system (DenSeeMammo—DSM) for breast density (BD) assessment to a non-inferiority threshold based on radiologists’ visual assessment. Pooled analysis was performed on 14,267 2D mammograms collected from women aged 48–55 years who underwent BC screening within three studies: RETomo, Florence study and PROCAS. BD was expressed through clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification. Women in BI-RADS D category had a 2.6 (95% CI 1.5–4.4) and a 3.6 (95% CI 1.4–9.3) times higher risk of incident and interval cancer, respectively, than women in the two lowest BD categories. The ability of DSM to predict risk of incident cancer was non-inferior to radiologists’ visual assessment as both point estimate and lower bound of 95% CI (AUC 0.589; 95% CI 0.580–0.597) were above the predefined visual assessment threshold (AUC 0.571). AUC for interval (AUC 0.631; 95% CI 0.623–0.639) cancers was even higher. BD assessed with new fully automated method is positively associated with BC risk and is not inferior to radiologists’ visual assessment. It is an even stronger marker of interval cancer, confirming an appreciable masking effect of BD that reduces mammography sensitivity. |
format |
article |
author |
Paolo Giorgi Rossi Olivera Djuric Valerie Hélin Susan Astley Paola Mantellini Andrea Nitrosi Elaine F. Harkness Emilien Gauthier Donella Puliti Corinne Balleyguier Camille Baron Fiona J. Gilbert André Grivegnée Pierpaolo Pattacini Stefan Michiels Suzette Delaloge |
author_facet |
Paolo Giorgi Rossi Olivera Djuric Valerie Hélin Susan Astley Paola Mantellini Andrea Nitrosi Elaine F. Harkness Emilien Gauthier Donella Puliti Corinne Balleyguier Camille Baron Fiona J. Gilbert André Grivegnée Pierpaolo Pattacini Stefan Michiels Suzette Delaloge |
author_sort |
Paolo Giorgi Rossi |
title |
Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk |
title_short |
Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk |
title_full |
Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk |
title_fullStr |
Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk |
title_sort |
validation of a new fully automated software for 2d digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d1149 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paologiorgirossi validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT oliveradjuric validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT valeriehelin validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT susanastley validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT paolamantellini validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT andreanitrosi validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT elainefharkness validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT emiliengauthier validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT donellapuliti validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT corinneballeyguier validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT camillebaron validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT fionajgilbert validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT andregrivegnee validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT pierpaolopattacini validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT stefanmichiels validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk AT suzettedelaloge validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk |
_version_ |
1718377788043427840 |