Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk

Abstract We compared accuracy for breast cancer (BC) risk stratification of a new fully automated system (DenSeeMammo—DSM) for breast density (BD) assessment to a non-inferiority threshold based on radiologists’ visual assessment. Pooled analysis was performed on 14,267 2D mammograms collected from...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Olivera Djuric, Valerie Hélin, Susan Astley, Paola Mantellini, Andrea Nitrosi, Elaine F. Harkness, Emilien Gauthier, Donella Puliti, Corinne Balleyguier, Camille Baron, Fiona J. Gilbert, André Grivegnée, Pierpaolo Pattacini, Stefan Michiels, Suzette Delaloge
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d1149
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d1149
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d11492021-12-02T18:37:10ZValidation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk10.1038/s41598-021-99433-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d11492021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99433-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We compared accuracy for breast cancer (BC) risk stratification of a new fully automated system (DenSeeMammo—DSM) for breast density (BD) assessment to a non-inferiority threshold based on radiologists’ visual assessment. Pooled analysis was performed on 14,267 2D mammograms collected from women aged 48–55 years who underwent BC screening within three studies: RETomo, Florence study and PROCAS. BD was expressed through clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification. Women in BI-RADS D category had a 2.6 (95% CI 1.5–4.4) and a 3.6 (95% CI 1.4–9.3) times higher risk of incident and interval cancer, respectively, than women in the two lowest BD categories. The ability of DSM to predict risk of incident cancer was non-inferior to radiologists’ visual assessment as both point estimate and lower bound of 95% CI (AUC 0.589; 95% CI 0.580–0.597) were above the predefined visual assessment threshold (AUC 0.571). AUC for interval (AUC 0.631; 95% CI 0.623–0.639) cancers was even higher. BD assessed with new fully automated method is positively associated with BC risk and is not inferior to radiologists’ visual assessment. It is an even stronger marker of interval cancer, confirming an appreciable masking effect of BD that reduces mammography sensitivity.Paolo Giorgi RossiOlivera DjuricValerie HélinSusan AstleyPaola MantelliniAndrea NitrosiElaine F. HarknessEmilien GauthierDonella PulitiCorinne BalleyguierCamille BaronFiona J. GilbertAndré GrivegnéePierpaolo PattaciniStefan MichielsSuzette DelalogeNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Olivera Djuric
Valerie Hélin
Susan Astley
Paola Mantellini
Andrea Nitrosi
Elaine F. Harkness
Emilien Gauthier
Donella Puliti
Corinne Balleyguier
Camille Baron
Fiona J. Gilbert
André Grivegnée
Pierpaolo Pattacini
Stefan Michiels
Suzette Delaloge
Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk
description Abstract We compared accuracy for breast cancer (BC) risk stratification of a new fully automated system (DenSeeMammo—DSM) for breast density (BD) assessment to a non-inferiority threshold based on radiologists’ visual assessment. Pooled analysis was performed on 14,267 2D mammograms collected from women aged 48–55 years who underwent BC screening within three studies: RETomo, Florence study and PROCAS. BD was expressed through clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification. Women in BI-RADS D category had a 2.6 (95% CI 1.5–4.4) and a 3.6 (95% CI 1.4–9.3) times higher risk of incident and interval cancer, respectively, than women in the two lowest BD categories. The ability of DSM to predict risk of incident cancer was non-inferior to radiologists’ visual assessment as both point estimate and lower bound of 95% CI (AUC 0.589; 95% CI 0.580–0.597) were above the predefined visual assessment threshold (AUC 0.571). AUC for interval (AUC 0.631; 95% CI 0.623–0.639) cancers was even higher. BD assessed with new fully automated method is positively associated with BC risk and is not inferior to radiologists’ visual assessment. It is an even stronger marker of interval cancer, confirming an appreciable masking effect of BD that reduces mammography sensitivity.
format article
author Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Olivera Djuric
Valerie Hélin
Susan Astley
Paola Mantellini
Andrea Nitrosi
Elaine F. Harkness
Emilien Gauthier
Donella Puliti
Corinne Balleyguier
Camille Baron
Fiona J. Gilbert
André Grivegnée
Pierpaolo Pattacini
Stefan Michiels
Suzette Delaloge
author_facet Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Olivera Djuric
Valerie Hélin
Susan Astley
Paola Mantellini
Andrea Nitrosi
Elaine F. Harkness
Emilien Gauthier
Donella Puliti
Corinne Balleyguier
Camille Baron
Fiona J. Gilbert
André Grivegnée
Pierpaolo Pattacini
Stefan Michiels
Suzette Delaloge
author_sort Paolo Giorgi Rossi
title Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk
title_short Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk
title_full Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk
title_fullStr Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk
title_sort validation of a new fully automated software for 2d digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2ae46de7556848ca9eefd8ac6c0d1149
work_keys_str_mv AT paologiorgirossi validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT oliveradjuric validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT valeriehelin validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT susanastley validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT paolamantellini validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT andreanitrosi validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT elainefharkness validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT emiliengauthier validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT donellapuliti validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT corinneballeyguier validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT camillebaron validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT fionajgilbert validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT andregrivegnee validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT pierpaolopattacini validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT stefanmichiels validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
AT suzettedelaloge validationofanewfullyautomatedsoftwarefor2ddigitalmammographicbreastdensityevaluationinpredictingbreastcancerrisk
_version_ 1718377788043427840