Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.

We build on recent examinations questioning the quality of online information about probiotic products by studying the themes of content, detecting virtual communities and identifying key influencers in social media using data science techniques. We conducted topic modelling (n = 36,715 tweets) and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Santosh Vijaykumar, Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar, Kristofor McCarty, Cuthbert Mutumbwa, Jawwad Mustafa, Cyndy Au
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2af08d7242704990bfa091e00d25804e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2af08d7242704990bfa091e00d25804e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2af08d7242704990bfa091e00d25804e2021-12-02T20:16:42ZThemes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0258098https://doaj.org/article/2af08d7242704990bfa091e00d25804e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258098https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203We build on recent examinations questioning the quality of online information about probiotic products by studying the themes of content, detecting virtual communities and identifying key influencers in social media using data science techniques. We conducted topic modelling (n = 36,715 tweets) and longitudinal social network analysis (n = 17,834 tweets) of probiotic chatter on Twitter from 2009-17. We used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to build the topic models and network analysis tool Gephi for building yearly graphs. We identified the top 10 topics of probiotics-related communication on Twitter and a constant rise in communication activity. However the number of communities grew consistently to peak in 2014 before dipping and levelling off by 2017. While several probiotics industry actors appeared and disappeared during this period, the influence of one specific actor rose from a hub initially to an authority in the latter years. With multi-brand advertising and probiotics promotions mostly occupying the Twitter chatter, scientists, journalists, or policymakers exerted minimal influence in these communities. Consistent with previous research, we find that probiotics-related content on social media veers towards promotions and benefits. Probiotic industry actors maintain consistent presence on Twitter while transitioning from hubs to authorities over time; scientific entities assume an authoritative role without much engagement. The involvement of scientific, journalistic or regulatory stakeholders will help create a balanced informational environment surrounding probiotic products.Santosh VijaykumarAravind Sesagiri RaamkumarKristofor McCartyCuthbert MutumbwaJawwad MustafaCyndy AuPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0258098 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Santosh Vijaykumar Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar Kristofor McCarty Cuthbert Mutumbwa Jawwad Mustafa Cyndy Au Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.
description	We build on recent examinations questioning the quality of online information about probiotic products by studying the themes of content, detecting virtual communities and identifying key influencers in social media using data science techniques. We conducted topic modelling (n = 36,715 tweets) and longitudinal social network analysis (n = 17,834 tweets) of probiotic chatter on Twitter from 2009-17. We used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to build the topic models and network analysis tool Gephi for building yearly graphs. We identified the top 10 topics of probiotics-related communication on Twitter and a constant rise in communication activity. However the number of communities grew consistently to peak in 2014 before dipping and levelling off by 2017. While several probiotics industry actors appeared and disappeared during this period, the influence of one specific actor rose from a hub initially to an authority in the latter years. With multi-brand advertising and probiotics promotions mostly occupying the Twitter chatter, scientists, journalists, or policymakers exerted minimal influence in these communities. Consistent with previous research, we find that probiotics-related content on social media veers towards promotions and benefits. Probiotic industry actors maintain consistent presence on Twitter while transitioning from hubs to authorities over time; scientific entities assume an authoritative role without much engagement. The involvement of scientific, journalistic or regulatory stakeholders will help create a balanced informational environment surrounding probiotic products.
format	article
author	Santosh Vijaykumar Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar Kristofor McCarty Cuthbert Mutumbwa Jawwad Mustafa Cyndy Au
author_facet	Santosh Vijaykumar Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar Kristofor McCarty Cuthbert Mutumbwa Jawwad Mustafa Cyndy Au
author_sort	Santosh Vijaykumar
title	Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.
title_short	Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.
title_full	Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.
title_fullStr	Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.
title_full_unstemmed	Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.
title_sort	themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: a retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/2af08d7242704990bfa091e00d25804e
work_keys_str_mv	AT santoshvijaykumar themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT aravindsesagiriraamkumar themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT kristoformccarty themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT cuthbertmutumbwa themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT jawwadmustafa themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017 AT cyndyau themescommunitiesandinfluencersofonlineprobioticschatteraretrospectiveanalysisfrom20092017
_version_	1718374459213086720

Themes, communities and influencers of online probiotics chatter: A retrospective analysis from 2009-2017.

Ejemplares similares