Effect of different disinfection treatments on the adhesion and separation of biofilm on stainless steel surface

Attachment and separation of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) biofilm on stainless steel (SS) in simulated cooling water with and without different sterilization treatments was investigated by calculation of surface energy, theoretical work of adhesion and analysis of Scanning Electron Microscope/Ene...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi Zhang, Honghua Ge, Weiwei Lin, Yanfang Song, Fang Ge, Xin Huang, Xinjing Meng
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2b694453a3ad464193d1e6aa092be39c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2b694453a3ad464193d1e6aa092be39c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2b694453a3ad464193d1e6aa092be39c2021-11-06T10:48:05ZEffect of different disinfection treatments on the adhesion and separation of biofilm on stainless steel surface0273-12231996-973210.2166/wst.2021.028https://doaj.org/article/2b694453a3ad464193d1e6aa092be39c2021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://wst.iwaponline.com/content/83/4/877https://doaj.org/toc/0273-1223https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9732Attachment and separation of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) biofilm on stainless steel (SS) in simulated cooling water with and without different sterilization treatments was investigated by calculation of surface energy, theoretical work of adhesion and analysis of Scanning Electron Microscope/Energy Dispersive Spectrometer. Two types of biocides, glutaraldehyde and Polyhexamethylene guanidine (PHMG), and electromagnetic treatment were used in this paper. The results show that PHMG had the best bactericidal performance, followed by glutaraldehyde, and electromagnetic treatment was the lowest one. The theoretical work of adhesion was used to quantitatively evaluate the adhesion of biofilm on the surface of the metal. Theoretical work of adhesion between biofilm and SS in simulated cooling water increased with time. The theoretical adhesion work and adhesive capacity of biofilm to SS surface increased after treating with glutaraldehyde while decreasing after treating with PHMG and electromagnetic field. As the theoretical adhesion work decreased, the biofilm was gradually removed from the stainless steel surface. On the contrary, the biofilm adhered more firmly. The results of SEM were also consistent with the calculation results of theoretical adhesion work. The results obtained indicated that electromagnetic treatment had the lowest effect in sterilization but the best in biofilm separation.Yi ZhangHonghua GeWeiwei LinYanfang SongFang GeXin HuangXinjing MengIWA Publishingarticleadhesionbiocidebiofilmcontact angleelectromagnetic treatmentstainless steelEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066ENWater Science and Technology, Vol 83, Iss 4, Pp 877-885 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic adhesion
biocide
biofilm
contact angle
electromagnetic treatment
stainless steel
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
spellingShingle adhesion
biocide
biofilm
contact angle
electromagnetic treatment
stainless steel
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Yi Zhang
Honghua Ge
Weiwei Lin
Yanfang Song
Fang Ge
Xin Huang
Xinjing Meng
Effect of different disinfection treatments on the adhesion and separation of biofilm on stainless steel surface
description Attachment and separation of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) biofilm on stainless steel (SS) in simulated cooling water with and without different sterilization treatments was investigated by calculation of surface energy, theoretical work of adhesion and analysis of Scanning Electron Microscope/Energy Dispersive Spectrometer. Two types of biocides, glutaraldehyde and Polyhexamethylene guanidine (PHMG), and electromagnetic treatment were used in this paper. The results show that PHMG had the best bactericidal performance, followed by glutaraldehyde, and electromagnetic treatment was the lowest one. The theoretical work of adhesion was used to quantitatively evaluate the adhesion of biofilm on the surface of the metal. Theoretical work of adhesion between biofilm and SS in simulated cooling water increased with time. The theoretical adhesion work and adhesive capacity of biofilm to SS surface increased after treating with glutaraldehyde while decreasing after treating with PHMG and electromagnetic field. As the theoretical adhesion work decreased, the biofilm was gradually removed from the stainless steel surface. On the contrary, the biofilm adhered more firmly. The results of SEM were also consistent with the calculation results of theoretical adhesion work. The results obtained indicated that electromagnetic treatment had the lowest effect in sterilization but the best in biofilm separation.
format article
author Yi Zhang
Honghua Ge
Weiwei Lin
Yanfang Song
Fang Ge
Xin Huang
Xinjing Meng
author_facet Yi Zhang
Honghua Ge
Weiwei Lin
Yanfang Song
Fang Ge
Xin Huang
Xinjing Meng
author_sort Yi Zhang
title Effect of different disinfection treatments on the adhesion and separation of biofilm on stainless steel surface
title_short Effect of different disinfection treatments on the adhesion and separation of biofilm on stainless steel surface
title_full Effect of different disinfection treatments on the adhesion and separation of biofilm on stainless steel surface
title_fullStr Effect of different disinfection treatments on the adhesion and separation of biofilm on stainless steel surface
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different disinfection treatments on the adhesion and separation of biofilm on stainless steel surface
title_sort effect of different disinfection treatments on the adhesion and separation of biofilm on stainless steel surface
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2b694453a3ad464193d1e6aa092be39c
work_keys_str_mv AT yizhang effectofdifferentdisinfectiontreatmentsontheadhesionandseparationofbiofilmonstainlesssteelsurface
AT honghuage effectofdifferentdisinfectiontreatmentsontheadhesionandseparationofbiofilmonstainlesssteelsurface
AT weiweilin effectofdifferentdisinfectiontreatmentsontheadhesionandseparationofbiofilmonstainlesssteelsurface
AT yanfangsong effectofdifferentdisinfectiontreatmentsontheadhesionandseparationofbiofilmonstainlesssteelsurface
AT fangge effectofdifferentdisinfectiontreatmentsontheadhesionandseparationofbiofilmonstainlesssteelsurface
AT xinhuang effectofdifferentdisinfectiontreatmentsontheadhesionandseparationofbiofilmonstainlesssteelsurface
AT xinjingmeng effectofdifferentdisinfectiontreatmentsontheadhesionandseparationofbiofilmonstainlesssteelsurface
_version_ 1718443785212395520