Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.

During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an unusually high submission rate of scholarly articles. Given that most academics were forced to work from home, the competing demands for familial duties may have penalized the scientific productivity of women. To test this hypothesis, we...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flaminio Squazzoni, Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, Daniel García-Costa, Mike Farjam, Bahar Mehmani
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc92021-12-02T20:07:50ZGender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257919https://doaj.org/article/2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc92021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257919https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an unusually high submission rate of scholarly articles. Given that most academics were forced to work from home, the competing demands for familial duties may have penalized the scientific productivity of women. To test this hypothesis, we looked at submitted manuscripts and peer review activities for all Elsevier journals between February and May 2018-2020, including data on over 5 million authors and referees. Results showed that during the first wave of the pandemic, women submitted proportionally fewer manuscripts than men. This deficit was especially pronounced among more junior cohorts of women academics. The rate of the peer-review invitation acceptance showed a less pronounced gender pattern with women taking on a greater service responsibility for journals, except for health & medicine, the field where the impact of COVID-19 research has been more prominent. Our findings suggest that the first wave of the pandemic has created potentially cumulative advantages for men.Flaminio SquazzoniGiangiacomo BravoFrancisco GrimaldoDaniel García-CostaMike FarjamBahar MehmaniPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0257919 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Flaminio Squazzoni
Giangiacomo Bravo
Francisco Grimaldo
Daniel García-Costa
Mike Farjam
Bahar Mehmani
Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.
description During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an unusually high submission rate of scholarly articles. Given that most academics were forced to work from home, the competing demands for familial duties may have penalized the scientific productivity of women. To test this hypothesis, we looked at submitted manuscripts and peer review activities for all Elsevier journals between February and May 2018-2020, including data on over 5 million authors and referees. Results showed that during the first wave of the pandemic, women submitted proportionally fewer manuscripts than men. This deficit was especially pronounced among more junior cohorts of women academics. The rate of the peer-review invitation acceptance showed a less pronounced gender pattern with women taking on a greater service responsibility for journals, except for health & medicine, the field where the impact of COVID-19 research has been more prominent. Our findings suggest that the first wave of the pandemic has created potentially cumulative advantages for men.
format article
author Flaminio Squazzoni
Giangiacomo Bravo
Francisco Grimaldo
Daniel García-Costa
Mike Farjam
Bahar Mehmani
author_facet Flaminio Squazzoni
Giangiacomo Bravo
Francisco Grimaldo
Daniel García-Costa
Mike Farjam
Bahar Mehmani
author_sort Flaminio Squazzoni
title Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.
title_short Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.
title_full Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.
title_fullStr Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.
title_full_unstemmed Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.
title_sort gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the covid-19 pandemic. a study on 2329 elsevier journals.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc9
work_keys_str_mv AT flaminiosquazzoni gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals
AT giangiacomobravo gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals
AT franciscogrimaldo gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals
AT danielgarciacosta gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals
AT mikefarjam gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals
AT baharmehmani gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals
_version_ 1718375230387257344