Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.
During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an unusually high submission rate of scholarly articles. Given that most academics were forced to work from home, the competing demands for familial duties may have penalized the scientific productivity of women. To test this hypothesis, we...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc9 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc9 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc92021-12-02T20:07:50ZGender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257919https://doaj.org/article/2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc92021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257919https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an unusually high submission rate of scholarly articles. Given that most academics were forced to work from home, the competing demands for familial duties may have penalized the scientific productivity of women. To test this hypothesis, we looked at submitted manuscripts and peer review activities for all Elsevier journals between February and May 2018-2020, including data on over 5 million authors and referees. Results showed that during the first wave of the pandemic, women submitted proportionally fewer manuscripts than men. This deficit was especially pronounced among more junior cohorts of women academics. The rate of the peer-review invitation acceptance showed a less pronounced gender pattern with women taking on a greater service responsibility for journals, except for health & medicine, the field where the impact of COVID-19 research has been more prominent. Our findings suggest that the first wave of the pandemic has created potentially cumulative advantages for men.Flaminio SquazzoniGiangiacomo BravoFrancisco GrimaldoDaniel García-CostaMike FarjamBahar MehmaniPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0257919 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Flaminio Squazzoni Giangiacomo Bravo Francisco Grimaldo Daniel García-Costa Mike Farjam Bahar Mehmani Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. |
description |
During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an unusually high submission rate of scholarly articles. Given that most academics were forced to work from home, the competing demands for familial duties may have penalized the scientific productivity of women. To test this hypothesis, we looked at submitted manuscripts and peer review activities for all Elsevier journals between February and May 2018-2020, including data on over 5 million authors and referees. Results showed that during the first wave of the pandemic, women submitted proportionally fewer manuscripts than men. This deficit was especially pronounced among more junior cohorts of women academics. The rate of the peer-review invitation acceptance showed a less pronounced gender pattern with women taking on a greater service responsibility for journals, except for health & medicine, the field where the impact of COVID-19 research has been more prominent. Our findings suggest that the first wave of the pandemic has created potentially cumulative advantages for men. |
format |
article |
author |
Flaminio Squazzoni Giangiacomo Bravo Francisco Grimaldo Daniel García-Costa Mike Farjam Bahar Mehmani |
author_facet |
Flaminio Squazzoni Giangiacomo Bravo Francisco Grimaldo Daniel García-Costa Mike Farjam Bahar Mehmani |
author_sort |
Flaminio Squazzoni |
title |
Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. |
title_short |
Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. |
title_full |
Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. |
title_fullStr |
Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. |
title_sort |
gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the covid-19 pandemic. a study on 2329 elsevier journals. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/2b85301bd04a421fbbdf5185c353abc9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT flaminiosquazzoni gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals AT giangiacomobravo gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals AT franciscogrimaldo gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals AT danielgarciacosta gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals AT mikefarjam gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals AT baharmehmani gendergapinjournalsubmissionsandpeerreviewduringthefirstwaveofthecovid19pandemicastudyon2329elsevierjournals |
_version_ |
1718375230387257344 |