Evolution of heterogeneity (I2) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals in large meta-analyses.
<h4>Background</h4>Assessment of heterogeneity is essential in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials. The most commonly used heterogeneity measure, I(2), provides an estimate of the proportion of variability in a meta-analysis that is explained by differences between th...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Kristian Thorlund, Georgina Imberger, Bradley C Johnston, Michael Walsh, Tahany Awad, Lehana Thabane, Christian Gluud, P J Devereaux, Jørn Wetterslev |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2ba7b850c09a4314b90e67308aea09d3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The number of patients and events required to limit the risk of overestimation of intervention effects in meta-analysis--a simulation study.
por: Kristian Thorlund, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews of anaesthesia interventions: a quantification and comparison between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
por: Georgina Imberger, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Evaluation of jackknife and bootstrap for defining confidence intervals for pairwise agreement measures.
por: Ana Severiano, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Should We Be Confident in Published Research? A Case Study of Confidence Interval Reporting in Health Education and Behavior Research
por: Adam E. Barry, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Designing and analyzing clinical trials with composite outcomes: consideration of possible treatment differences between the individual outcomes.
por: Janice Pogue, et al.
Publicado: (2012)