Not Kant vs. Scheler, but either Kant or Scheler. From Construction to Foundation of Ethics

Scheler’s moral theory is often presented as a critical reaction to Kantian formalism. The majority of contributions on this topic deals with Scheler’s proposal of an a priori material ethics in contrast with the a priori formal ethics developed by Kant, or with the critical analysis of the eight p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Virginia Sanchini
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR IT
Publicado:	Rosenberg & Sellier 2016
Materias:	Kant Scheler ethics foundation the fact of reason Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2baa117fadb342579c9bc48acbd5698a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2baa117fadb342579c9bc48acbd5698a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2baa117fadb342579c9bc48acbd5698a2021-12-02T09:51:20ZNot Kant vs. Scheler, but either Kant or Scheler. From Construction to Foundation of Ethics10.13128/Phe_Mi-195732280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/2baa117fadb342579c9bc48acbd5698a2016-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7132https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 Scheler’s moral theory is often presented as a critical reaction to Kantian formalism. The majority of contributions on this topic deals with Scheler’s proposal of an a priori material ethics in contrast with the a priori formal ethics developed by Kant, or with the critical analysis of the eight prejudices ascribed by Scheler to Kant. A very few of them, however, explore their respective foundational attempts to see why such a conflict actually arises. This paper addresses exactly the foundational issue, trying to fulfill this empty space in the literature. In particular, by briefly investigating the third section of the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Moral and the doctrine of the Fact of Reason depicted by Kant in the second Critique on the one hand and the phenomenological theory of values elaborated by Scheler on the other hand, it will be shown that the disagreement between the two authors should not be ascribed to a real incompatibility, but rather to a different way of conceiving what the foundation of ethics actually is. Virginia SanchiniRosenberg & SellierarticleKantSchelerethicsfoundationthe fact of reasonAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 5 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR IT
topic	Kant Scheler ethics foundation the fact of reason Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
spellingShingle	Kant Scheler ethics foundation the fact of reason Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Virginia Sanchini Not Kant vs. Scheler, but either Kant or Scheler. From Construction to Foundation of Ethics
description	Scheler’s moral theory is often presented as a critical reaction to Kantian formalism. The majority of contributions on this topic deals with Scheler’s proposal of an a priori material ethics in contrast with the a priori formal ethics developed by Kant, or with the critical analysis of the eight prejudices ascribed by Scheler to Kant. A very few of them, however, explore their respective foundational attempts to see why such a conflict actually arises. This paper addresses exactly the foundational issue, trying to fulfill this empty space in the literature. In particular, by briefly investigating the third section of the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Moral and the doctrine of the Fact of Reason depicted by Kant in the second Critique on the one hand and the phenomenological theory of values elaborated by Scheler on the other hand, it will be shown that the disagreement between the two authors should not be ascribed to a real incompatibility, but rather to a different way of conceiving what the foundation of ethics actually is.
format	article
author	Virginia Sanchini
author_facet	Virginia Sanchini
author_sort	Virginia Sanchini
title	Not Kant vs. Scheler, but either Kant or Scheler. From Construction to Foundation of Ethics
title_short	Not Kant vs. Scheler, but either Kant or Scheler. From Construction to Foundation of Ethics
title_full	Not Kant vs. Scheler, but either Kant or Scheler. From Construction to Foundation of Ethics
title_fullStr	Not Kant vs. Scheler, but either Kant or Scheler. From Construction to Foundation of Ethics
title_full_unstemmed	Not Kant vs. Scheler, but either Kant or Scheler. From Construction to Foundation of Ethics
title_sort	not kant vs. scheler, but either kant or scheler. from construction to foundation of ethics
publisher	Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/2baa117fadb342579c9bc48acbd5698a
work_keys_str_mv	AT virginiasanchini notkantvsschelerbuteitherkantorschelerfromconstructiontofoundationofethics
_version_	1718397994855825408

Not Kant vs. Scheler, but either Kant or Scheler. From Construction to Foundation of Ethics

Ejemplares similares