Bilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM

This bilateral comparison in HRC is conducted in order to confirm the accuracy claimed by National Institute of Metrological Research in Italy (INRiM) and Central Office of Measures in Poland (GUM). Also, this study compares the difference of measurement results between two modernized deadweight-typ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	J.D. Fidelus, A. Germak, C. Origlia
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Rockwell Hardness HRC Bilateral comparison Electric apparatus and materials. Electric circuits. Electric networks TK452-454.4
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2bb2799e35d74b38bc48a3b35cf31e0b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2bb2799e35d74b38bc48a3b35cf31e0b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2bb2799e35d74b38bc48a3b35cf31e0b2021-11-26T04:40:08ZBilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM2665-917410.1016/j.measen.2021.100360https://doaj.org/article/2bb2799e35d74b38bc48a3b35cf31e0b2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917421003238https://doaj.org/toc/2665-9174This bilateral comparison in HRC is conducted in order to confirm the accuracy claimed by National Institute of Metrological Research in Italy (INRiM) and Central Office of Measures in Poland (GUM). Also, this study compares the difference of measurement results between two modernized deadweight-type Rockwell's hardness standard machines (HSMs) from GUM and primary hardness standard machine (PHSM) from INRiM. The hardness blocks of about 20 HRC, 35 HRC, 45 HRC, 50 HRC, 60 HRC and 65 HRC, which all have uniformity less then ±0.4 HRC according to EN ISO 6508-3, were used in this comparison.J.D. FidelusA. GermakC. OrigliaElsevierarticleRockwellHardnessHRCBilateral comparisonElectric apparatus and materials. Electric circuits. Electric networksTK452-454.4ENMeasurement: Sensors, Vol 18, Iss , Pp 100360- (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Rockwell Hardness HRC Bilateral comparison Electric apparatus and materials. Electric circuits. Electric networks TK452-454.4
spellingShingle	Rockwell Hardness HRC Bilateral comparison Electric apparatus and materials. Electric circuits. Electric networks TK452-454.4 J.D. Fidelus A. Germak C. Origlia Bilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM
description	This bilateral comparison in HRC is conducted in order to confirm the accuracy claimed by National Institute of Metrological Research in Italy (INRiM) and Central Office of Measures in Poland (GUM). Also, this study compares the difference of measurement results between two modernized deadweight-type Rockwell's hardness standard machines (HSMs) from GUM and primary hardness standard machine (PHSM) from INRiM. The hardness blocks of about 20 HRC, 35 HRC, 45 HRC, 50 HRC, 60 HRC and 65 HRC, which all have uniformity less then ±0.4 HRC according to EN ISO 6508-3, were used in this comparison.
format	article
author	J.D. Fidelus A. Germak C. Origlia
author_facet	J.D. Fidelus A. Germak C. Origlia
author_sort	J.D. Fidelus
title	Bilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM
title_short	Bilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM
title_full	Bilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM
title_fullStr	Bilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM
title_full_unstemmed	Bilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM
title_sort	bilateral comparison in rockwell c hardness scale between inrim and gum
publisher	Elsevier
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/2bb2799e35d74b38bc48a3b35cf31e0b
work_keys_str_mv	AT jdfidelus bilateralcomparisoninrockwellchardnessscalebetweeninrimandgum AT agermak bilateralcomparisoninrockwellchardnessscalebetweeninrimandgum AT coriglia bilateralcomparisoninrockwellchardnessscalebetweeninrimandgum
_version_	1718409831032815616

Bilateral comparison in Rockwell C hardness scale between INRiM and GUM

Ejemplares similares