A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep

Between 2016 and 2019, two different infant sleeping-box interventions were implemented in England: (1) shallow polypropylene baby boxes were distributed via a feasibility study to families with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) risk factors; and (2) a commercial–health system partnership scheme d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helen L. Ball, Catherine E. Taylor, Cassandra M. Yuill
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2bbc4f1bce7e4c908f4ef6d4caf10c93
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2bbc4f1bce7e4c908f4ef6d4caf10c93
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2bbc4f1bce7e4c908f4ef6d4caf10c932021-11-11T16:36:04ZA Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep10.3390/ijerph1821114731660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/2bbc4f1bce7e4c908f4ef6d4caf10c932021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11473https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Between 2016 and 2019, two different infant sleeping-box interventions were implemented in England: (1) shallow polypropylene baby boxes were distributed via a feasibility study to families with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) risk factors; and (2) a commercial–health system partnership scheme distributed cardboard baby boxes to new mothers in particular locations. We conducted parent evaluations of both interventions at the time of implementation. The views of 79 parents receiving polypropylene boxes and 77 parents receiving cardboard boxes were captured using online questionnaires and telephone interviews. Participants provided feedback on education received about using the box, their perception of the box design and materials, their experiences of using the box they received, and whether they would recommend it to others. Parents appreciated that both boxes provided a portable space to place their baby near them anywhere in the home, discouraging other riskier practices. The polypropylene box was rated more favourably regarding transparency, hygiene, and portability outside the home. A minority of parents found the idea of putting their baby in any box unappealing; however, younger mothers and smokers particularly appreciated the ability to safely co-sleep with their babies using the shallower box. Overall, the versatility of the polypropylene box scheme was more positively evaluated than the cardboard baby box scheme, which, stripped of its social value as part of a larger welfare provision, had minimal value for parents that received it.Helen L. BallCatherine E. TaylorCassandra M. YuillMDPI AGarticlesafer sleep interventionssudden unexpected infant death (SUDI)Pēpi-Podsbaby boxesSIDS preventionMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11473, p 11473 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic safer sleep interventions
sudden unexpected infant death (SUDI)
Pēpi-Pods
baby boxes
SIDS prevention
Medicine
R
spellingShingle safer sleep interventions
sudden unexpected infant death (SUDI)
Pēpi-Pods
baby boxes
SIDS prevention
Medicine
R
Helen L. Ball
Catherine E. Taylor
Cassandra M. Yuill
A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep
description Between 2016 and 2019, two different infant sleeping-box interventions were implemented in England: (1) shallow polypropylene baby boxes were distributed via a feasibility study to families with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) risk factors; and (2) a commercial–health system partnership scheme distributed cardboard baby boxes to new mothers in particular locations. We conducted parent evaluations of both interventions at the time of implementation. The views of 79 parents receiving polypropylene boxes and 77 parents receiving cardboard boxes were captured using online questionnaires and telephone interviews. Participants provided feedback on education received about using the box, their perception of the box design and materials, their experiences of using the box they received, and whether they would recommend it to others. Parents appreciated that both boxes provided a portable space to place their baby near them anywhere in the home, discouraging other riskier practices. The polypropylene box was rated more favourably regarding transparency, hygiene, and portability outside the home. A minority of parents found the idea of putting their baby in any box unappealing; however, younger mothers and smokers particularly appreciated the ability to safely co-sleep with their babies using the shallower box. Overall, the versatility of the polypropylene box scheme was more positively evaluated than the cardboard baby box scheme, which, stripped of its social value as part of a larger welfare provision, had minimal value for parents that received it.
format article
author Helen L. Ball
Catherine E. Taylor
Cassandra M. Yuill
author_facet Helen L. Ball
Catherine E. Taylor
Cassandra M. Yuill
author_sort Helen L. Ball
title A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep
title_short A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep
title_full A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep
title_fullStr A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep
title_full_unstemmed A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep
title_sort box to put the baby in: uk parent perceptions of two baby box programmes promoted for infant sleep
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2bbc4f1bce7e4c908f4ef6d4caf10c93
work_keys_str_mv AT helenlball aboxtoputthebabyinukparentperceptionsoftwobabyboxprogrammespromotedforinfantsleep
AT catherineetaylor aboxtoputthebabyinukparentperceptionsoftwobabyboxprogrammespromotedforinfantsleep
AT cassandramyuill aboxtoputthebabyinukparentperceptionsoftwobabyboxprogrammespromotedforinfantsleep
AT helenlball boxtoputthebabyinukparentperceptionsoftwobabyboxprogrammespromotedforinfantsleep
AT catherineetaylor boxtoputthebabyinukparentperceptionsoftwobabyboxprogrammespromotedforinfantsleep
AT cassandramyuill boxtoputthebabyinukparentperceptionsoftwobabyboxprogrammespromotedforinfantsleep
_version_ 1718432287260934144