Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance

This preliminary investigation studied the effects of concurrent and terminal visual feedback during a standing balance task on ankle co-contraction, which was accomplished via surface electromyography of an agonist–antagonist muscle pair (medial gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles). Two com...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rachel V. Vitali, Vincent J. Barone, Jamie Ferris, Leia A. Stirling, Kathleen H. Sienko
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2c259328a123493288e6637cb478b5be
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2c259328a123493288e6637cb478b5be
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2c259328a123493288e6637cb478b5be2021-11-11T19:15:24ZEffects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance10.3390/s212173051424-8220https://doaj.org/article/2c259328a123493288e6637cb478b5be2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7305https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220This preliminary investigation studied the effects of concurrent and terminal visual feedback during a standing balance task on ankle co-contraction, which was accomplished via surface electromyography of an agonist–antagonist muscle pair (medial gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles). Two complementary mathematical definitions of co-contraction indices captured changes in ankle muscle recruitment and modulation strategies. Nineteen healthy older adults received both feedback types in a randomized order. Following an analysis of co-contraction index reliability as a function of surface electromyography normalization technique, linear mixed-effects regression analyses revealed participants learned or utilized different ankle co-contraction recruitment (i.e., relative muscle pair activity magnitudes) and modulation (i.e., absolute muscle pair activity magnitudes) strategies depending on feedback type and following the cessation of feedback use. Ankle co-contraction modulation increased when concurrent feedback was used and significantly decreased when concurrent feedback was removed. Ankle co-contraction recruitment and modulation did not significantly change when terminal feedback was used or when it was removed. Neither ankle co-contraction recruitment nor modulation was significantly different when concurrent feedback was used compared to when terminal feedback was used. The changes in ankle co-contraction recruitment and modulation were significantly different when concurrent feedback was removed as compared to when terminal feedback was removed. Finally, this study found a significant interaction between feedback type, removal of feedback, and order of use of feedback type. These results have implications for the design of balance training technologies using visual feedback.Rachel V. VitaliVincent J. BaroneJamie FerrisLeia A. StirlingKathleen H. SienkoMDPI AGarticlebalancevisual feedbacksensory augmentationolder adultwearable sensorssurface electromyographyChemical technologyTP1-1185ENSensors, Vol 21, Iss 7305, p 7305 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic balance
visual feedback
sensory augmentation
older adult
wearable sensors
surface electromyography
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle balance
visual feedback
sensory augmentation
older adult
wearable sensors
surface electromyography
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Rachel V. Vitali
Vincent J. Barone
Jamie Ferris
Leia A. Stirling
Kathleen H. Sienko
Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
description This preliminary investigation studied the effects of concurrent and terminal visual feedback during a standing balance task on ankle co-contraction, which was accomplished via surface electromyography of an agonist–antagonist muscle pair (medial gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles). Two complementary mathematical definitions of co-contraction indices captured changes in ankle muscle recruitment and modulation strategies. Nineteen healthy older adults received both feedback types in a randomized order. Following an analysis of co-contraction index reliability as a function of surface electromyography normalization technique, linear mixed-effects regression analyses revealed participants learned or utilized different ankle co-contraction recruitment (i.e., relative muscle pair activity magnitudes) and modulation (i.e., absolute muscle pair activity magnitudes) strategies depending on feedback type and following the cessation of feedback use. Ankle co-contraction modulation increased when concurrent feedback was used and significantly decreased when concurrent feedback was removed. Ankle co-contraction recruitment and modulation did not significantly change when terminal feedback was used or when it was removed. Neither ankle co-contraction recruitment nor modulation was significantly different when concurrent feedback was used compared to when terminal feedback was used. The changes in ankle co-contraction recruitment and modulation were significantly different when concurrent feedback was removed as compared to when terminal feedback was removed. Finally, this study found a significant interaction between feedback type, removal of feedback, and order of use of feedback type. These results have implications for the design of balance training technologies using visual feedback.
format article
author Rachel V. Vitali
Vincent J. Barone
Jamie Ferris
Leia A. Stirling
Kathleen H. Sienko
author_facet Rachel V. Vitali
Vincent J. Barone
Jamie Ferris
Leia A. Stirling
Kathleen H. Sienko
author_sort Rachel V. Vitali
title Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_short Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_full Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_fullStr Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
title_sort effects of concurrent and terminal visual feedback on ankle co-contraction in older adults during standing balance
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2c259328a123493288e6637cb478b5be
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelvvitali effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance
AT vincentjbarone effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance
AT jamieferris effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance
AT leiaastirling effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance
AT kathleenhsienko effectsofconcurrentandterminalvisualfeedbackonanklecocontractioninolderadultsduringstandingbalance
_version_ 1718431574487203840