Governance Structure of Microfinance Institutions: A Comparison of Models and Its Implication on Social Impact and Poverty Reduction

The purpose of this paper is to compare three different models of MFIs, namely microfinance banks (MFB), Microcredit programme (MCP) and rural development scheme (RDS), by focusing on their governance structures, and subsequently analyse their implications on social impact and poverty reduction of t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Md Nazim Uddin, Hamdino Hamdan, Nor Azizan Che Embi, Salina Kassim, Norma Bt Md Saad
Formato: article
Lenguaje:AR
EN
TR
Publicado: Ibn Haldun University 2020
Materias:
H
P
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2c2c35a6ef3f4a8fa5bff3264ba7a250
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2c2c35a6ef3f4a8fa5bff3264ba7a250
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2c2c35a6ef3f4a8fa5bff3264ba7a2502021-11-18T17:44:16ZGovernance Structure of Microfinance Institutions: A Comparison of Models and Its Implication on Social Impact and Poverty Reduction10.36657/ihcd.2020.682651-379Xhttps://doaj.org/article/2c2c35a6ef3f4a8fa5bff3264ba7a2502020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journal.ihu.edu.tr/index.php/ihu1/article/view/91https://doaj.org/toc/2651-379XThe purpose of this paper is to compare three different models of MFIs, namely microfinance banks (MFB), Microcredit programme (MCP) and rural development scheme (RDS), by focusing on their governance structures, and subsequently analyse their implications on social impact and poverty reduction of the MFIs. Three MFIs, one from each model, will be considered, using Bangladesh as the case study. Bangladesh is a country which is considered to be a pioneer in providing micro-finance to the underprivileged people to improve their entrepreneurial capacity.  In methodology, the study relies on Porter’s Competitive Strategy Theory (1979). This theory is based on the concept that five forces determine the competitive intensity and attractiveness of a market which assesses five forces. The study relies on secondary data collected mainly from the annual reports of the three MFIs, and Microcredit Regulatory Authority (MRA) report. This study aims to contribute towards better governance practices of the MFIs given its strong implications on social responsibility, accountability, transparency, financial performance, increasing their social impact and poverty reduction of the MFIs. Findings of this study provide essential inputs on the way forward for the evolution of microfinance, as framed by the global development discourse and subsequent public policy choices. Overall, the study shows that only a limited number of variables influence the social impact and poverty reduction of an MFI. The limitation of the studied investment fund is that it invests in expanding and mature MFI’s. So the results of this research can only be generalised to expanding and mature MFI’s. The approach to microfinance governance should be broadened by focusing more on stakeholders and the decision making process in an MFI. Better social responsibility and poverty reduction of the MFIs contribute positively to financial inclusion through poverty alleviation, empowerment of the poor and better financial access, leading to sustainable economic growth.Md Nazim UddinHamdino HamdanNor Azizan Che EmbiSalina KassimNorma Bt Md SaadIbn Haldun UniversityarticleGovernance StructureMicrofinanceSocial ImpactMicrofinance BanksRural Development SchemeSocial SciencesHLanguage and LiteraturePArts in generalNX1-820ARENTRİbn Haldun Çalışmaları Dergisi, Vol 5, Iss 1 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language AR
EN
TR
topic Governance Structure
Microfinance
Social Impact
Microfinance Banks
Rural Development Scheme
Social Sciences
H
Language and Literature
P
Arts in general
NX1-820
spellingShingle Governance Structure
Microfinance
Social Impact
Microfinance Banks
Rural Development Scheme
Social Sciences
H
Language and Literature
P
Arts in general
NX1-820
Md Nazim Uddin
Hamdino Hamdan
Nor Azizan Che Embi
Salina Kassim
Norma Bt Md Saad
Governance Structure of Microfinance Institutions: A Comparison of Models and Its Implication on Social Impact and Poverty Reduction
description The purpose of this paper is to compare three different models of MFIs, namely microfinance banks (MFB), Microcredit programme (MCP) and rural development scheme (RDS), by focusing on their governance structures, and subsequently analyse their implications on social impact and poverty reduction of the MFIs. Three MFIs, one from each model, will be considered, using Bangladesh as the case study. Bangladesh is a country which is considered to be a pioneer in providing micro-finance to the underprivileged people to improve their entrepreneurial capacity.  In methodology, the study relies on Porter’s Competitive Strategy Theory (1979). This theory is based on the concept that five forces determine the competitive intensity and attractiveness of a market which assesses five forces. The study relies on secondary data collected mainly from the annual reports of the three MFIs, and Microcredit Regulatory Authority (MRA) report. This study aims to contribute towards better governance practices of the MFIs given its strong implications on social responsibility, accountability, transparency, financial performance, increasing their social impact and poverty reduction of the MFIs. Findings of this study provide essential inputs on the way forward for the evolution of microfinance, as framed by the global development discourse and subsequent public policy choices. Overall, the study shows that only a limited number of variables influence the social impact and poverty reduction of an MFI. The limitation of the studied investment fund is that it invests in expanding and mature MFI’s. So the results of this research can only be generalised to expanding and mature MFI’s. The approach to microfinance governance should be broadened by focusing more on stakeholders and the decision making process in an MFI. Better social responsibility and poverty reduction of the MFIs contribute positively to financial inclusion through poverty alleviation, empowerment of the poor and better financial access, leading to sustainable economic growth.
format article
author Md Nazim Uddin
Hamdino Hamdan
Nor Azizan Che Embi
Salina Kassim
Norma Bt Md Saad
author_facet Md Nazim Uddin
Hamdino Hamdan
Nor Azizan Che Embi
Salina Kassim
Norma Bt Md Saad
author_sort Md Nazim Uddin
title Governance Structure of Microfinance Institutions: A Comparison of Models and Its Implication on Social Impact and Poverty Reduction
title_short Governance Structure of Microfinance Institutions: A Comparison of Models and Its Implication on Social Impact and Poverty Reduction
title_full Governance Structure of Microfinance Institutions: A Comparison of Models and Its Implication on Social Impact and Poverty Reduction
title_fullStr Governance Structure of Microfinance Institutions: A Comparison of Models and Its Implication on Social Impact and Poverty Reduction
title_full_unstemmed Governance Structure of Microfinance Institutions: A Comparison of Models and Its Implication on Social Impact and Poverty Reduction
title_sort governance structure of microfinance institutions: a comparison of models and its implication on social impact and poverty reduction
publisher Ibn Haldun University
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/2c2c35a6ef3f4a8fa5bff3264ba7a250
work_keys_str_mv AT mdnazimuddin governancestructureofmicrofinanceinstitutionsacomparisonofmodelsanditsimplicationonsocialimpactandpovertyreduction
AT hamdinohamdan governancestructureofmicrofinanceinstitutionsacomparisonofmodelsanditsimplicationonsocialimpactandpovertyreduction
AT norazizancheembi governancestructureofmicrofinanceinstitutionsacomparisonofmodelsanditsimplicationonsocialimpactandpovertyreduction
AT salinakassim governancestructureofmicrofinanceinstitutionsacomparisonofmodelsanditsimplicationonsocialimpactandpovertyreduction
AT normabtmdsaad governancestructureofmicrofinanceinstitutionsacomparisonofmodelsanditsimplicationonsocialimpactandpovertyreduction
_version_ 1718420715671126016