RATING ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE

The article examines aspects of the rating assessment of personnel activities. For the analysis, the previous and the base period of the rating assessment are highlighted. The scheme of accounting of the achievements of the teaching staff is presented, which is carried out in the information system...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	V.V KULIKOVA, L.V LEKHTYANSKAYA, O.V PODKOPAEVA
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Association “Professional analytics of autopoiesis systems" 2021
Materias:	Education L
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2c343b257aad4c5896457cfeb977cb8f
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2c343b257aad4c5896457cfeb977cb8f
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2c343b257aad4c5896457cfeb977cb8f2021-11-10T08:46:42ZRATING ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE2311-010410.26140/knz4-2021-1003-0003https://doaj.org/article/2c343b257aad4c5896457cfeb977cb8f2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://repository.kvantor.org/public/134/4190https://doaj.org/toc/2311-0104The article examines aspects of the rating assessment of personnel activities. For the analysis, the previous and the base period of the rating assessment are highlighted. The scheme of accounting of the achievements of the teaching staff is presented, which is carried out in the information system «Rating evaluation system». This rating score allows you to reasonably carry out incentive payments based on the fulfillment of certain indicators. Indicators are highlighted, for each of which the numerical values are determined, fixed in the orders of the university. This work describes the generally accepted and mandatory indicators of methodological and scientific work, such as an increase in the Hirsch index by one or more points; training; preparation of a review; student publications; publications of scientific and pedagogical workers; educational and methodological support. Participation in the rating assessment emphasizes the professional activities of any employee, can increase the performance of an educational institution, and achieve strategic goals and objectives. The proposed material demonstrates the rating as a management tool for the head. The analysis of rating indicators by groups of accounting objects and by job structure is given. The authors draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the developed and implemented rating system of assessment, which is automated, functional, structured, taking into account individual indicators of achievement.V.V KULIKOVAL.V LEKHTYANSKAYAO.V PODKOPAEVAAssociation “Professional analytics of autopoiesis systems"articleEducationLENRUКарельский Научный Журнал, Vol 10, Iss 36 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	Education L
spellingShingle	Education L V.V KULIKOVA L.V LEKHTYANSKAYA O.V PODKOPAEVA RATING ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE
description	The article examines aspects of the rating assessment of personnel activities. For the analysis, the previous and the base period of the rating assessment are highlighted. The scheme of accounting of the achievements of the teaching staff is presented, which is carried out in the information system «Rating evaluation system». This rating score allows you to reasonably carry out incentive payments based on the fulfillment of certain indicators. Indicators are highlighted, for each of which the numerical values are determined, fixed in the orders of the university. This work describes the generally accepted and mandatory indicators of methodological and scientific work, such as an increase in the Hirsch index by one or more points; training; preparation of a review; student publications; publications of scientific and pedagogical workers; educational and methodological support. Participation in the rating assessment emphasizes the professional activities of any employee, can increase the performance of an educational institution, and achieve strategic goals and objectives. The proposed material demonstrates the rating as a management tool for the head. The analysis of rating indicators by groups of accounting objects and by job structure is given. The authors draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the developed and implemented rating system of assessment, which is automated, functional, structured, taking into account individual indicators of achievement.
format	article
author	V.V KULIKOVA L.V LEKHTYANSKAYA O.V PODKOPAEVA
author_facet	V.V KULIKOVA L.V LEKHTYANSKAYA O.V PODKOPAEVA
author_sort	V.V KULIKOVA
title	RATING ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE
title_short	RATING ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE
title_full	RATING ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE
title_fullStr	RATING ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE
title_full_unstemmed	RATING ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE
title_sort	rating assessment of personnel performance
publisher	Association “Professional analytics of autopoiesis systems"
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/2c343b257aad4c5896457cfeb977cb8f
work_keys_str_mv	AT vvkulikova ratingassessmentofpersonnelperformance AT lvlekhtyanskaya ratingassessmentofpersonnelperformance AT ovpodkopaeva ratingassessmentofpersonnelperformance
_version_	1718440358779551744

RATING ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE

Ejemplares similares