Integrated Approach for Sectoral Carbon Drawdown Solutions

Sectoral contributions of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are at the heart of the climate debate. Carbon drawdown solutions from different sectors (e.g. energy, land, urban infrastructure, and industrial systems) will play significant roles in mitigating climate change in the coming decades. This wor...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Xiaoping Jia, Taomeizi Zhou, Zhiwei Li, Kathleen B. Aviso, Raymond R. Tan, Xuexiu Jia, Jirí Jaromír Klemeš, Fang Wang
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2021
Materias:	Chemical engineering TP155-156 Computer engineering. Computer hardware TK7885-7895
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2c628b72e08f46d2bb9c8cc8e877d384
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2c628b72e08f46d2bb9c8cc8e877d384
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2c628b72e08f46d2bb9c8cc8e877d3842021-11-15T21:47:06ZIntegrated Approach for Sectoral Carbon Drawdown Solutions10.3303/CET21881862283-9216https://doaj.org/article/2c628b72e08f46d2bb9c8cc8e877d3842021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11979https://doaj.org/toc/2283-9216Sectoral contributions of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are at the heart of the climate debate. Carbon drawdown solutions from different sectors (e.g. energy, land, urban infrastructure, and industrial systems) will play significant roles in mitigating climate change in the coming decades. This work identifies the feasible carbon drawdown solutions to support GHG emissions reduction paths globally. These solutions should meet both economic constraints and carbon emissions targets. This work develops a novel approach that integrates Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis (CEPA), the Best-Worst Method (BWM), and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). For each sector, BWM is used to evaluate the performance of reduction solutions and identify their priority weights. Then, CBA is used to rank the options further. Finally, CEPA combines with the Marginal Emission Reduction Cost Curve to find the final mix to meet carbon reduction targets and investment costs. The results prioritize global carbon drawdown potentials for the power (186.4 Gt CO2-eq), construction (97.9 Gt CO2-eq), industry (23.8 Gt CO2-eq), transportation (20.2 Gt CO2-eq), food, agriculture, and land use (2.5 Gt CO2-eq) sectors. Based on these results, this work presents an optimal path for carbon drawdown.Xiaoping JiaTaomeizi ZhouZhiwei LiKathleen B. AvisoRaymond R. TanXuexiu JiaJirí Jaromír KlemešFang WangAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.articleChemical engineeringTP155-156Computer engineering. Computer hardwareTK7885-7895ENChemical Engineering Transactions, Vol 88 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Chemical engineering TP155-156 Computer engineering. Computer hardware TK7885-7895
spellingShingle	Chemical engineering TP155-156 Computer engineering. Computer hardware TK7885-7895 Xiaoping Jia Taomeizi Zhou Zhiwei Li Kathleen B. Aviso Raymond R. Tan Xuexiu Jia Jirí Jaromír Klemeš Fang Wang Integrated Approach for Sectoral Carbon Drawdown Solutions
description	Sectoral contributions of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are at the heart of the climate debate. Carbon drawdown solutions from different sectors (e.g. energy, land, urban infrastructure, and industrial systems) will play significant roles in mitigating climate change in the coming decades. This work identifies the feasible carbon drawdown solutions to support GHG emissions reduction paths globally. These solutions should meet both economic constraints and carbon emissions targets. This work develops a novel approach that integrates Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis (CEPA), the Best-Worst Method (BWM), and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). For each sector, BWM is used to evaluate the performance of reduction solutions and identify their priority weights. Then, CBA is used to rank the options further. Finally, CEPA combines with the Marginal Emission Reduction Cost Curve to find the final mix to meet carbon reduction targets and investment costs. The results prioritize global carbon drawdown potentials for the power (186.4 Gt CO2-eq), construction (97.9 Gt CO2-eq), industry (23.8 Gt CO2-eq), transportation (20.2 Gt CO2-eq), food, agriculture, and land use (2.5 Gt CO2-eq) sectors. Based on these results, this work presents an optimal path for carbon drawdown.
format	article
author	Xiaoping Jia Taomeizi Zhou Zhiwei Li Kathleen B. Aviso Raymond R. Tan Xuexiu Jia Jirí Jaromír Klemeš Fang Wang
author_facet	Xiaoping Jia Taomeizi Zhou Zhiwei Li Kathleen B. Aviso Raymond R. Tan Xuexiu Jia Jirí Jaromír Klemeš Fang Wang
author_sort	Xiaoping Jia
title	Integrated Approach for Sectoral Carbon Drawdown Solutions
title_short	Integrated Approach for Sectoral Carbon Drawdown Solutions
title_full	Integrated Approach for Sectoral Carbon Drawdown Solutions
title_fullStr	Integrated Approach for Sectoral Carbon Drawdown Solutions
title_full_unstemmed	Integrated Approach for Sectoral Carbon Drawdown Solutions
title_sort	integrated approach for sectoral carbon drawdown solutions
publisher	AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/2c628b72e08f46d2bb9c8cc8e877d384
work_keys_str_mv	AT xiaopingjia integratedapproachforsectoralcarbondrawdownsolutions AT taomeizizhou integratedapproachforsectoralcarbondrawdownsolutions AT zhiweili integratedapproachforsectoralcarbondrawdownsolutions AT kathleenbaviso integratedapproachforsectoralcarbondrawdownsolutions AT raymondrtan integratedapproachforsectoralcarbondrawdownsolutions AT xuexiujia integratedapproachforsectoralcarbondrawdownsolutions AT jirijaromirklemes integratedapproachforsectoralcarbondrawdownsolutions AT fangwang integratedapproachforsectoralcarbondrawdownsolutions
_version_	1718426836119060480

Integrated Approach for Sectoral Carbon Drawdown Solutions

Ejemplares similares