Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces
Nowadays, because of the increasing terrorist attacks around the urban areas, designing buildings by contrast of resulted loads of blast came into consideration particularly in some sensitive buildings & vital arteries. When a blast occurs, the resulted emissions in environment leads to appearan...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | FA |
Publicado: |
Iranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE)
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead2021-11-08T15:46:09ZComparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces2476-39772538-261610.22065/jsce.2016.40550https://doaj.org/article/2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead2016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.jsce.ir/article_40550_ee0a3d53be8d853bbebf6490cf2fef36.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2476-3977https://doaj.org/toc/2538-2616Nowadays, because of the increasing terrorist attacks around the urban areas, designing buildings by contrast of resulted loads of blast came into consideration particularly in some sensitive buildings & vital arteries. When a blast occurs, the resulted emissions in environment leads to appearance of several penalties and endangers to the human life. Steel structures generally are designed on the basis of standard seismic and gravity loads, it is necessary to investigate the implantation of these structures under the impact of the loads originated from blast. This article presents numerical studies of two-dimensional structural models with 2 and 5 stories which are including simple steel frame system in addition to CBF. The models were analyzed by nonlinear dynamic analysis method using the instruction UFC 3-340-02 in two adverse levels of blast loads by SAP 2000 software. In this study structural models are designed and analyzed using two designing methods: the basic performance design, and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Finally, two set of results are compared in detail.P. HassanvandM. H. Rasoul AbadiA. S. MoghadamM. HosseiniIranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE)articleexplosionsteel structurescbf systemspassive defenseBridge engineeringTG1-470Building constructionTH1-9745FAJournal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 112-127 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
FA |
topic |
explosion steel structures cbf systems passive defense Bridge engineering TG1-470 Building construction TH1-9745 |
spellingShingle |
explosion steel structures cbf systems passive defense Bridge engineering TG1-470 Building construction TH1-9745 P. Hassanvand M. H. Rasoul Abadi A. S. Moghadam M. Hosseini Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces |
description |
Nowadays, because of the increasing terrorist attacks around the urban areas, designing buildings by contrast of resulted loads of blast came into consideration particularly in some sensitive buildings & vital arteries. When a blast occurs, the resulted emissions in environment leads to appearance of several penalties and endangers to the human life. Steel structures generally are designed on the basis of standard seismic and gravity loads, it is necessary to investigate the implantation of these structures under the impact of the loads originated from blast. This article presents numerical studies of two-dimensional structural models with 2 and 5 stories which are including simple steel frame system in addition to CBF. The models were analyzed by nonlinear dynamic analysis method using the instruction UFC 3-340-02 in two adverse levels of blast loads by SAP 2000 software. In this study structural models are designed and analyzed using two designing methods: the basic performance design, and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Finally, two set of results are compared in detail. |
format |
article |
author |
P. Hassanvand M. H. Rasoul Abadi A. S. Moghadam M. Hosseini |
author_facet |
P. Hassanvand M. H. Rasoul Abadi A. S. Moghadam M. Hosseini |
author_sort |
P. Hassanvand |
title |
Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces |
title_short |
Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces |
title_full |
Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces |
title_sort |
comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces |
publisher |
Iranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE) |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT phassanvand comparisonofdesigningsimplesteelframecoaxialbracesystemsbycontrastofblastusingtwomethodsofloadresistancecoefficientsperformancesurfaces AT mhrasoulabadi comparisonofdesigningsimplesteelframecoaxialbracesystemsbycontrastofblastusingtwomethodsofloadresistancecoefficientsperformancesurfaces AT asmoghadam comparisonofdesigningsimplesteelframecoaxialbracesystemsbycontrastofblastusingtwomethodsofloadresistancecoefficientsperformancesurfaces AT mhosseini comparisonofdesigningsimplesteelframecoaxialbracesystemsbycontrastofblastusingtwomethodsofloadresistancecoefficientsperformancesurfaces |
_version_ |
1718441645259620352 |