Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces

Nowadays, because of the increasing terrorist attacks around the urban areas, designing buildings by contrast of resulted loads of blast came into consideration particularly in some sensitive buildings & vital arteries. When a blast occurs, the resulted emissions in environment leads to appearan...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: P. Hassanvand, M. H. Rasoul Abadi, A. S. Moghadam, M. Hosseini
Formato: article
Lenguaje:FA
Publicado: Iranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE) 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead2021-11-08T15:46:09ZComparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces2476-39772538-261610.22065/jsce.2016.40550https://doaj.org/article/2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead2016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.jsce.ir/article_40550_ee0a3d53be8d853bbebf6490cf2fef36.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2476-3977https://doaj.org/toc/2538-2616Nowadays, because of the increasing terrorist attacks around the urban areas, designing buildings by contrast of resulted loads of blast came into consideration particularly in some sensitive buildings & vital arteries. When a blast occurs, the resulted emissions in environment leads to appearance of several penalties and endangers to the human life. Steel structures generally are designed on the basis of standard seismic and gravity loads, it is necessary to investigate the implantation of these structures under the impact of the loads originated from blast. This article presents numerical studies of two-dimensional structural models with 2 and 5 stories which are including simple steel frame system in addition to CBF. The models were analyzed by nonlinear dynamic analysis method using the instruction UFC 3-340-02 in two adverse levels of blast loads by SAP 2000 software. In this study structural models are designed and analyzed using two designing methods: the basic performance design, and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Finally, two set of results are compared in detail.P. HassanvandM. H. Rasoul AbadiA. S. MoghadamM. HosseiniIranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE)articleexplosionsteel structurescbf systemspassive defenseBridge engineeringTG1-470Building constructionTH1-9745FAJournal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 112-127 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language FA
topic explosion
steel structures
cbf systems
passive defense
Bridge engineering
TG1-470
Building construction
TH1-9745
spellingShingle explosion
steel structures
cbf systems
passive defense
Bridge engineering
TG1-470
Building construction
TH1-9745
P. Hassanvand
M. H. Rasoul Abadi
A. S. Moghadam
M. Hosseini
Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces
description Nowadays, because of the increasing terrorist attacks around the urban areas, designing buildings by contrast of resulted loads of blast came into consideration particularly in some sensitive buildings & vital arteries. When a blast occurs, the resulted emissions in environment leads to appearance of several penalties and endangers to the human life. Steel structures generally are designed on the basis of standard seismic and gravity loads, it is necessary to investigate the implantation of these structures under the impact of the loads originated from blast. This article presents numerical studies of two-dimensional structural models with 2 and 5 stories which are including simple steel frame system in addition to CBF. The models were analyzed by nonlinear dynamic analysis method using the instruction UFC 3-340-02 in two adverse levels of blast loads by SAP 2000 software. In this study structural models are designed and analyzed using two designing methods: the basic performance design, and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Finally, two set of results are compared in detail.
format article
author P. Hassanvand
M. H. Rasoul Abadi
A. S. Moghadam
M. Hosseini
author_facet P. Hassanvand
M. H. Rasoul Abadi
A. S. Moghadam
M. Hosseini
author_sort P. Hassanvand
title Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces
title_short Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces
title_full Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces
title_fullStr Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces
title_sort comparison of designing simple steel frame & coaxial brace systems by contrast of blast, using two methods of load & resistance coefficients & performance surfaces
publisher Iranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE)
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/2c64e64f137145da856bfaba5f9adead
work_keys_str_mv AT phassanvand comparisonofdesigningsimplesteelframecoaxialbracesystemsbycontrastofblastusingtwomethodsofloadresistancecoefficientsperformancesurfaces
AT mhrasoulabadi comparisonofdesigningsimplesteelframecoaxialbracesystemsbycontrastofblastusingtwomethodsofloadresistancecoefficientsperformancesurfaces
AT asmoghadam comparisonofdesigningsimplesteelframecoaxialbracesystemsbycontrastofblastusingtwomethodsofloadresistancecoefficientsperformancesurfaces
AT mhosseini comparisonofdesigningsimplesteelframecoaxialbracesystemsbycontrastofblastusingtwomethodsofloadresistancecoefficientsperformancesurfaces
_version_ 1718441645259620352