Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017

Publishers’ policies have the capability to increase transparency in scholarly literature. Malički and colleagues carried out a systematic review of over 150 studies that have examined scholarly journals’ recommendations. They find that requirements in terms of authorship, conflict of interests, dat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Mario Malički, Ana Jerončić, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Lex Bouter, Gerben ter Riet
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2c7712cc780845e1a721a035736e1eba
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2c7712cc780845e1a721a035736e1eba
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2c7712cc780845e1a721a035736e1eba2021-12-02T19:16:33ZSystematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 201710.1038/s41467-021-26027-y2041-1723https://doaj.org/article/2c7712cc780845e1a721a035736e1eba2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26027-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723Publishers’ policies have the capability to increase transparency in scholarly literature. Malički and colleagues carried out a systematic review of over 150 studies that have examined scholarly journals’ recommendations. They find that requirements in terms of authorship, conflict of interests, data sharing, funding disclosure or ethics approval declaration vary greatly over time, among journals and across disciplines.Mario MaličkiAna JerončićIJsbrand Jan AalbersbergLex BouterGerben ter RietNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Science Q
spellingShingle	Science Q Mario Malički Ana Jerončić IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg Lex Bouter Gerben ter Riet Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
description	Publishers’ policies have the capability to increase transparency in scholarly literature. Malički and colleagues carried out a systematic review of over 150 studies that have examined scholarly journals’ recommendations. They find that requirements in terms of authorship, conflict of interests, data sharing, funding disclosure or ethics approval declaration vary greatly over time, among journals and across disciplines.
format	article
author	Mario Malički Ana Jerončić IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg Lex Bouter Gerben ter Riet
author_facet	Mario Malički Ana Jerončić IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg Lex Bouter Gerben ter Riet
author_sort	Mario Malički
title	Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
title_short	Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
title_full	Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
title_fullStr	Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
title_full_unstemmed	Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
title_sort	systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/2c7712cc780845e1a721a035736e1eba
work_keys_str_mv	AT mariomalicki systematicreviewandmetaanalysesofstudiesanalysinginstructionstoauthorsfrom1987to2017 AT anajeroncic systematicreviewandmetaanalysesofstudiesanalysinginstructionstoauthorsfrom1987to2017 AT ijsbrandjanaalbersberg systematicreviewandmetaanalysesofstudiesanalysinginstructionstoauthorsfrom1987to2017 AT lexbouter systematicreviewandmetaanalysesofstudiesanalysinginstructionstoauthorsfrom1987to2017 AT gerbenterriet systematicreviewandmetaanalysesofstudiesanalysinginstructionstoauthorsfrom1987to2017
_version_	1718376904376975360

Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017

Ejemplares similares