Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
Publishers’ policies have the capability to increase transparency in scholarly literature. Malički and colleagues carried out a systematic review of over 150 studies that have examined scholarly journals’ recommendations. They find that requirements in terms of authorship, conflict of interests, dat...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Mario Malički, Ana Jerončić, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Lex Bouter, Gerben ter Riet |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2c7712cc780845e1a721a035736e1eba |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
por: Yali Liu, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review of meta-analyses
por: Bortolato B, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Investigation on factors associated with ovarian cancer: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analyses
por: Kiarash Tanha, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comprehensive research synopsis and systematic meta-analyses in Parkinson's disease genetics: The PDGene database.
por: Christina M Lill, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Acupuncture-related adverse events: systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies
por: Dominik Irnich, et al.
Publicado: (2021)