Validating quantitative PCR assays for cfDNA detection without DNA extraction in exercising SLE patients

Abstract Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been investigated as a screening tool for many diseases. To avoid expensive and time-consuming DNA isolation, direct quantification PCR assays can be established. However, rigorous validation is required to provide reliable data in the clinical and non-...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elmo W. I. Neuberger, Alexandra Brahmer, Tobias Ehlert, Katrin Kluge, Keito F. A. Philippi, Simone C. Boedecker, Julia Weinmann-Menke, Perikles Simon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2c8625c02e284cb487322ebbc35471f4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2c8625c02e284cb487322ebbc35471f4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2c8625c02e284cb487322ebbc35471f42021-12-02T16:31:57ZValidating quantitative PCR assays for cfDNA detection without DNA extraction in exercising SLE patients10.1038/s41598-021-92826-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/2c8625c02e284cb487322ebbc35471f42021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92826-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been investigated as a screening tool for many diseases. To avoid expensive and time-consuming DNA isolation, direct quantification PCR assays can be established. However, rigorous validation is required to provide reliable data in the clinical and non-clinical context. Considering the International Organization for Standardization, as well as bioanalytical method validation guidelines, we provide a comprehensive procedure to validate assays for cfDNA quantification from blood plasma without DNA isolation. A 90 and 222 bp assay was validated to study the kinetics of cfDNA after exercise in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The assays showed ultra-low limit of quantification (LOQ) with 0.47 and 0.69 ng/ml, repeatability ≤ 11.6% (95% CI 8.1–20.3), and intermediate precision ≤ 12.1% (95% CI 9.2–17.7). Incurred sample reanalysis confirmed the precision of the procedure. The additional consideration of pre-analytical factors shows that centrifugation speed and temperature do not change cfDNA concentrations. In SLE patients cfDNA increases ~ twofold after a walking exercise, normalizing after 60 min of rest. The established assays allow reliable and cost-efficient quantification of cfDNA in minute amounts of plasma in the clinical setting. Additionally, the assay can be used as a tool to determine the impact of pre-analytical factors and validate cfDNA quantity and quality of isolated samples.Elmo W. I. NeubergerAlexandra BrahmerTobias EhlertKatrin KlugeKeito F. A. PhilippiSimone C. BoedeckerJulia Weinmann-MenkePerikles SimonNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Elmo W. I. Neuberger
Alexandra Brahmer
Tobias Ehlert
Katrin Kluge
Keito F. A. Philippi
Simone C. Boedecker
Julia Weinmann-Menke
Perikles Simon
Validating quantitative PCR assays for cfDNA detection without DNA extraction in exercising SLE patients
description Abstract Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been investigated as a screening tool for many diseases. To avoid expensive and time-consuming DNA isolation, direct quantification PCR assays can be established. However, rigorous validation is required to provide reliable data in the clinical and non-clinical context. Considering the International Organization for Standardization, as well as bioanalytical method validation guidelines, we provide a comprehensive procedure to validate assays for cfDNA quantification from blood plasma without DNA isolation. A 90 and 222 bp assay was validated to study the kinetics of cfDNA after exercise in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The assays showed ultra-low limit of quantification (LOQ) with 0.47 and 0.69 ng/ml, repeatability ≤ 11.6% (95% CI 8.1–20.3), and intermediate precision ≤ 12.1% (95% CI 9.2–17.7). Incurred sample reanalysis confirmed the precision of the procedure. The additional consideration of pre-analytical factors shows that centrifugation speed and temperature do not change cfDNA concentrations. In SLE patients cfDNA increases ~ twofold after a walking exercise, normalizing after 60 min of rest. The established assays allow reliable and cost-efficient quantification of cfDNA in minute amounts of plasma in the clinical setting. Additionally, the assay can be used as a tool to determine the impact of pre-analytical factors and validate cfDNA quantity and quality of isolated samples.
format article
author Elmo W. I. Neuberger
Alexandra Brahmer
Tobias Ehlert
Katrin Kluge
Keito F. A. Philippi
Simone C. Boedecker
Julia Weinmann-Menke
Perikles Simon
author_facet Elmo W. I. Neuberger
Alexandra Brahmer
Tobias Ehlert
Katrin Kluge
Keito F. A. Philippi
Simone C. Boedecker
Julia Weinmann-Menke
Perikles Simon
author_sort Elmo W. I. Neuberger
title Validating quantitative PCR assays for cfDNA detection without DNA extraction in exercising SLE patients
title_short Validating quantitative PCR assays for cfDNA detection without DNA extraction in exercising SLE patients
title_full Validating quantitative PCR assays for cfDNA detection without DNA extraction in exercising SLE patients
title_fullStr Validating quantitative PCR assays for cfDNA detection without DNA extraction in exercising SLE patients
title_full_unstemmed Validating quantitative PCR assays for cfDNA detection without DNA extraction in exercising SLE patients
title_sort validating quantitative pcr assays for cfdna detection without dna extraction in exercising sle patients
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2c8625c02e284cb487322ebbc35471f4
work_keys_str_mv AT elmowineuberger validatingquantitativepcrassaysforcfdnadetectionwithoutdnaextractioninexercisingslepatients
AT alexandrabrahmer validatingquantitativepcrassaysforcfdnadetectionwithoutdnaextractioninexercisingslepatients
AT tobiasehlert validatingquantitativepcrassaysforcfdnadetectionwithoutdnaextractioninexercisingslepatients
AT katrinkluge validatingquantitativepcrassaysforcfdnadetectionwithoutdnaextractioninexercisingslepatients
AT keitofaphilippi validatingquantitativepcrassaysforcfdnadetectionwithoutdnaextractioninexercisingslepatients
AT simonecboedecker validatingquantitativepcrassaysforcfdnadetectionwithoutdnaextractioninexercisingslepatients
AT juliaweinmannmenke validatingquantitativepcrassaysforcfdnadetectionwithoutdnaextractioninexercisingslepatients
AT periklessimon validatingquantitativepcrassaysforcfdnadetectionwithoutdnaextractioninexercisingslepatients
_version_ 1718383799908171776