Replacing The Responsibility to Protect: The Equitable Theory of Humanitarian Intervention

In this article, Ciarán J. Burke argues that the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ initiative has failed. Burke presents a series of fundamental flaws, both with the doctrine advanced by the ICISS, and with the subsequent attempts to incorporate it into the international legal framework. Burke opines that...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Ciarán Burke
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: Amsterdam Law Forum 2009
Sujets:
Law
K
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/2c999110ba864524b6cce4a80321bd11
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2c999110ba864524b6cce4a80321bd11
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2c999110ba864524b6cce4a80321bd112021-12-02T02:10:08ZReplacing The Responsibility to Protect: The Equitable Theory of Humanitarian Intervention1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/2c999110ba864524b6cce4a80321bd112009-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/64https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156In this article, Ciarán J. Burke argues that the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ initiative has failed. Burke presents a series of fundamental flaws, both with the doctrine advanced by the ICISS, and with the subsequent attempts to incorporate it into the international legal framework. Burke opines that equity, as a source of international law, should instead be used to shed fresh light on the debate, keeping the discourse within the law and away from subjective ethics, and drafting a novel framework which he dubs ‘equitable humanitarian intervention’. Ciarán BurkeAmsterdam Law Forumarticleinternational law, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect, independence, human rights law, Kosovo, Russia, Georgia, Putin, R2P, Equity, Equitable theory of humanitarian interventionLawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 1, Iss 2, Pp 61-87 (2009)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic international law, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect, independence, human rights law, Kosovo, Russia, Georgia, Putin, R2P, Equity, Equitable theory of humanitarian intervention
Law
K
spellingShingle international law, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect, independence, human rights law, Kosovo, Russia, Georgia, Putin, R2P, Equity, Equitable theory of humanitarian intervention
Law
K
Ciarán Burke
Replacing The Responsibility to Protect: The Equitable Theory of Humanitarian Intervention
description In this article, Ciarán J. Burke argues that the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ initiative has failed. Burke presents a series of fundamental flaws, both with the doctrine advanced by the ICISS, and with the subsequent attempts to incorporate it into the international legal framework. Burke opines that equity, as a source of international law, should instead be used to shed fresh light on the debate, keeping the discourse within the law and away from subjective ethics, and drafting a novel framework which he dubs ‘equitable humanitarian intervention’.
format article
author Ciarán Burke
author_facet Ciarán Burke
author_sort Ciarán Burke
title Replacing The Responsibility to Protect: The Equitable Theory of Humanitarian Intervention
title_short Replacing The Responsibility to Protect: The Equitable Theory of Humanitarian Intervention
title_full Replacing The Responsibility to Protect: The Equitable Theory of Humanitarian Intervention
title_fullStr Replacing The Responsibility to Protect: The Equitable Theory of Humanitarian Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Replacing The Responsibility to Protect: The Equitable Theory of Humanitarian Intervention
title_sort replacing the responsibility to protect: the equitable theory of humanitarian intervention
publisher Amsterdam Law Forum
publishDate 2009
url https://doaj.org/article/2c999110ba864524b6cce4a80321bd11
work_keys_str_mv AT ciaranburke replacingtheresponsibilitytoprotecttheequitabletheoryofhumanitarianintervention
_version_ 1718402638761951232