Suitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in Kibale National Park, Uganda.

Landscape patterns and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) densities in Kibale National Park show important variation among communities that are geographically close to one another (from 1.5 to 5.1 chimpanzees/km2). Anthropogenic activities inside the park (past logging activities, current e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarah Bortolamiol, Marianne Cohen, Kevin Potts, Flora Pennec, Protase Rwaburindore, John Kasenene, Andrew Seguya, Quentin Vignaud, Sabrina Krief
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2cb31b57b245410cb6c8fd5315e6211e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2cb31b57b245410cb6c8fd5315e6211e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2cb31b57b245410cb6c8fd5315e6211e2021-11-25T06:08:03ZSuitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in Kibale National Park, Uganda.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0102177https://doaj.org/article/2cb31b57b245410cb6c8fd5315e6211e2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/25033459/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Landscape patterns and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) densities in Kibale National Park show important variation among communities that are geographically close to one another (from 1.5 to 5.1 chimpanzees/km2). Anthropogenic activities inside the park (past logging activities, current encroachment) and outside its limits (food and cash crops) may impact the amount and distribution of food resources for chimpanzees (frugivorous species) and their spatial distribution within the park. Spatial and temporal patterns of fruit availability were recorded over 18 months at Sebitoli (a site of intermediate chimpanzee density and higher anthropic pressure) with the aim of understanding the factors explaining chimpanzee density there, in comparison to results from two other sites, also in Kibale: Kanyawara (low chimpanzee density) and Ngogo (high density, and furthest from Sebitoli). Because of the post-logging regenerating status of the forest in Sebitoli and Kanyawara, smaller basal area (BA) of fruiting trees most widely consumed by the chimpanzees in Kanyawara and Sebitoli was expected compared to Ngogo (not logged commercially). Due to the distance between sites, spatial and temporal fruit abundance in Sebitoli was expected to be more similar to Kanyawara than to Ngogo. While species functional classes consumed by Sebitoli chimpanzees (foods eaten during periods of high or low fruit abundance) differ from the two other sites, Sebitoli is very similar to Kanyawara in terms of land-cover and consumed species. Among feeding trees, Ficus species are particularly important resources for chimpanzees at Sebitoli, where their basal area is higher than at Kanywara or Ngogo. Ficus species provided a relatively consistent supply of food for chimpanzees throughout the year, and we suggest that this could help to explain the unusually high density of chimpanzees in such a disturbed site.Sarah BortolamiolMarianne CohenKevin PottsFlora PennecProtase RwaburindoreJohn KaseneneAndrew SeguyaQuentin VignaudSabrina KriefPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 7, p e102177 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sarah Bortolamiol
Marianne Cohen
Kevin Potts
Flora Pennec
Protase Rwaburindore
John Kasenene
Andrew Seguya
Quentin Vignaud
Sabrina Krief
Suitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in Kibale National Park, Uganda.
description Landscape patterns and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) densities in Kibale National Park show important variation among communities that are geographically close to one another (from 1.5 to 5.1 chimpanzees/km2). Anthropogenic activities inside the park (past logging activities, current encroachment) and outside its limits (food and cash crops) may impact the amount and distribution of food resources for chimpanzees (frugivorous species) and their spatial distribution within the park. Spatial and temporal patterns of fruit availability were recorded over 18 months at Sebitoli (a site of intermediate chimpanzee density and higher anthropic pressure) with the aim of understanding the factors explaining chimpanzee density there, in comparison to results from two other sites, also in Kibale: Kanyawara (low chimpanzee density) and Ngogo (high density, and furthest from Sebitoli). Because of the post-logging regenerating status of the forest in Sebitoli and Kanyawara, smaller basal area (BA) of fruiting trees most widely consumed by the chimpanzees in Kanyawara and Sebitoli was expected compared to Ngogo (not logged commercially). Due to the distance between sites, spatial and temporal fruit abundance in Sebitoli was expected to be more similar to Kanyawara than to Ngogo. While species functional classes consumed by Sebitoli chimpanzees (foods eaten during periods of high or low fruit abundance) differ from the two other sites, Sebitoli is very similar to Kanyawara in terms of land-cover and consumed species. Among feeding trees, Ficus species are particularly important resources for chimpanzees at Sebitoli, where their basal area is higher than at Kanywara or Ngogo. Ficus species provided a relatively consistent supply of food for chimpanzees throughout the year, and we suggest that this could help to explain the unusually high density of chimpanzees in such a disturbed site.
format article
author Sarah Bortolamiol
Marianne Cohen
Kevin Potts
Flora Pennec
Protase Rwaburindore
John Kasenene
Andrew Seguya
Quentin Vignaud
Sabrina Krief
author_facet Sarah Bortolamiol
Marianne Cohen
Kevin Potts
Flora Pennec
Protase Rwaburindore
John Kasenene
Andrew Seguya
Quentin Vignaud
Sabrina Krief
author_sort Sarah Bortolamiol
title Suitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in Kibale National Park, Uganda.
title_short Suitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in Kibale National Park, Uganda.
title_full Suitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in Kibale National Park, Uganda.
title_fullStr Suitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in Kibale National Park, Uganda.
title_full_unstemmed Suitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in Kibale National Park, Uganda.
title_sort suitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in kibale national park, uganda.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/2cb31b57b245410cb6c8fd5315e6211e
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahbortolamiol suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT mariannecohen suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT kevinpotts suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT florapennec suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT protaserwaburindore suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT johnkasenene suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT andrewseguya suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT quentinvignaud suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT sabrinakrief suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
_version_ 1718414153401499648