Organizational ethnography: "Clicks" among employees on private companies

This paper is a description of daily activities in private companies related to the social relations in workplace between employee, management, as well as consumer. Dyadic social relationship is built based on the construction of agreement between individuals in that organization. The interaction wh...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Safriadi Safriadi, Hardiyanti Munsi, Andi Batara Al Isra
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ID
Publicado:	Hasanuddin University 2020
Materias:	Ethnography Clique Relationship Corporate. Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology GN301-674
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2d12d91693db4059a425271685c68ba5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2d12d91693db4059a425271685c68ba5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2d12d91693db4059a425271685c68ba52021-11-08T23:09:16ZOrganizational ethnography: "Clicks" among employees on private companies10.31947/etnosia.v5i1.96692527-93192548-9747https://doaj.org/article/2d12d91693db4059a425271685c68ba52020-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/etnosia/article/view/9669https://doaj.org/toc/2527-9319https://doaj.org/toc/2548-9747This paper is a description of daily activities in private companies related to the social relations in workplace between employee, management, as well as consumer. Dyadic social relationship is built based on the construction of agreement between individuals in that organization. The interaction which happened in the construction of agreement caused social relations that occur in certain period. The quality of social relations depends on how is the content of that agreement, which is certainly guided by values and norms that had been agreed. Therefore, agreement that established sustainably in dyadic social relationships caused a clique. This clique manifested in agreement, a similarity in thought and feeling in the activities either in the workplace or outside. Moreover, there are other parts in organization interactions such as an act of talk about the negative things of others, which make that people feel disturbed. The gossip could be in a negative labeling form which is given to an individual or group that caused a disharmony in social relations. The methods of collecting data are observation, in-depth interview, literature study and documents. The research results show that clique and gossip in a company workplace are closely related to the harmony and disharmony of workplace, also contribute in the performances of employee in particular and company in general.Safriadi SafriadiHardiyanti MunsiAndi Batara Al IsraHasanuddin UniversityarticleEthnographyCliqueRelationshipCorporate.Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropologyGN301-674ENIDEtnosia, Vol 5, Iss 1 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ID
topic	Ethnography Clique Relationship Corporate. Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology GN301-674
spellingShingle	Ethnography Clique Relationship Corporate. Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology GN301-674 Safriadi Safriadi Hardiyanti Munsi Andi Batara Al Isra Organizational ethnography: "Clicks" among employees on private companies
description	This paper is a description of daily activities in private companies related to the social relations in workplace between employee, management, as well as consumer. Dyadic social relationship is built based on the construction of agreement between individuals in that organization. The interaction which happened in the construction of agreement caused social relations that occur in certain period. The quality of social relations depends on how is the content of that agreement, which is certainly guided by values and norms that had been agreed. Therefore, agreement that established sustainably in dyadic social relationships caused a clique. This clique manifested in agreement, a similarity in thought and feeling in the activities either in the workplace or outside. Moreover, there are other parts in organization interactions such as an act of talk about the negative things of others, which make that people feel disturbed. The gossip could be in a negative labeling form which is given to an individual or group that caused a disharmony in social relations. The methods of collecting data are observation, in-depth interview, literature study and documents. The research results show that clique and gossip in a company workplace are closely related to the harmony and disharmony of workplace, also contribute in the performances of employee in particular and company in general.
format	article
author	Safriadi Safriadi Hardiyanti Munsi Andi Batara Al Isra
author_facet	Safriadi Safriadi Hardiyanti Munsi Andi Batara Al Isra
author_sort	Safriadi Safriadi
title	Organizational ethnography: "Clicks" among employees on private companies
title_short	Organizational ethnography: "Clicks" among employees on private companies
title_full	Organizational ethnography: "Clicks" among employees on private companies
title_fullStr	Organizational ethnography: "Clicks" among employees on private companies
title_full_unstemmed	Organizational ethnography: "Clicks" among employees on private companies
title_sort	organizational ethnography: "clicks" among employees on private companies
publisher	Hasanuddin University
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/2d12d91693db4059a425271685c68ba5
work_keys_str_mv	AT safriadisafriadi organizationalethnographyclicksamongemployeesonprivatecompanies AT hardiyantimunsi organizationalethnographyclicksamongemployeesonprivatecompanies AT andibataraalisra organizationalethnographyclicksamongemployeesonprivatecompanies
_version_	1718441372269150208

Organizational ethnography: "Clicks" among employees on private companies

Ejemplares similares