A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time

Divisive normalization is thought to be a ubiquitous computation in the brain, but has not been studied in decisions that require integrating evidence over time. Here, the authors show in humans that dynamic divisive normalization accounts for the uneven weighting of perceptual evidence over time.

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Waitsang Keung, Todd A. Hagen, Robert C. Wilson
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:	Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2d1874240ed64b868fce972896fdc003
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2d1874240ed64b868fce972896fdc003
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2d1874240ed64b868fce972896fdc0032021-12-02T15:39:10ZA divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time10.1038/s41467-020-15630-02041-1723https://doaj.org/article/2d1874240ed64b868fce972896fdc0032020-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15630-0https://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723Divisive normalization is thought to be a ubiquitous computation in the brain, but has not been studied in decisions that require integrating evidence over time. Here, the authors show in humans that dynamic divisive normalization accounts for the uneven weighting of perceptual evidence over time.Waitsang KeungTodd A. HagenRobert C. WilsonNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Science Q
spellingShingle	Science Q Waitsang Keung Todd A. Hagen Robert C. Wilson A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
description	Divisive normalization is thought to be a ubiquitous computation in the brain, but has not been studied in decisions that require integrating evidence over time. Here, the authors show in humans that dynamic divisive normalization accounts for the uneven weighting of perceptual evidence over time.
format	article
author	Waitsang Keung Todd A. Hagen Robert C. Wilson
author_facet	Waitsang Keung Todd A. Hagen Robert C. Wilson
author_sort	Waitsang Keung
title	A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_short	A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_full	A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_fullStr	A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_full_unstemmed	A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_sort	divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/2d1874240ed64b868fce972896fdc003
work_keys_str_mv	AT waitsangkeung adivisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime AT toddahagen adivisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime AT robertcwilson adivisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime AT waitsangkeung divisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime AT toddahagen divisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime AT robertcwilson divisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime
_version_	1718385979338784768

A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time

Ejemplares similares