A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
Divisive normalization is thought to be a ubiquitous computation in the brain, but has not been studied in decisions that require integrating evidence over time. Here, the authors show in humans that dynamic divisive normalization accounts for the uneven weighting of perceptual evidence over time.
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Waitsang Keung, Todd A. Hagen, Robert C. Wilson |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2d1874240ed64b868fce972896fdc003 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Molecular phylogeny of the leafy liverwort Lejeunea (Porellales): evidence for a neotropical origin, uneven distribution of sexual systems and insufficient taxonomy.
por: Jochen Heinrichs, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation
por: Tarryn Balsdon, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evidence accumulation relates to perceptual consciousness and monitoring
por: Michael Pereira, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
TERRITORIAL POLITICS AND THE REACH Of THE STATE: UNEVENNESS BY DESIGN
por: BOONE,CATHERINE
Publicado: (2012) -
HRECs and journalism research: The uneven playing field
por: Kayt Davies
Publicado: (2014)