Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients

Background: Papulonecrotic tuberculid (PNT) is said to be a hypersensitivity reaction to M. tuberculosis. Some reports indicate that organisms are demonstrable by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Methods: We describe 12 patients with PNT over 6 years. We reviewed the histopathologic features, cl...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajalakshmi Tirumalae, Inchira K. Yeliur, Meryl Antony, Geojith George, John Kenneth
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Mattioli1885 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2d1c360b764f4477b815cadb33a6f0ce
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2d1c360b764f4477b815cadb33a6f0ce
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2d1c360b764f4477b815cadb33a6f0ce2021-11-17T08:32:23ZPapulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients10.5826/dpc.0402a032160-9381https://doaj.org/article/2d1c360b764f4477b815cadb33a6f0ce2014-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/878https://doaj.org/toc/2160-9381 Background: Papulonecrotic tuberculid (PNT) is said to be a hypersensitivity reaction to M. tuberculosis. Some reports indicate that organisms are demonstrable by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Methods: We describe 12 patients with PNT over 6 years. We reviewed the histopathologic features, clinical data and follow-up. PCR for M. tuberculosis DNA was done in all cases. Results: There were 7 men and 5 women. The ages ranged from 3-58 years. Upper limbs were commonly involved (8 cases). All patients had multiple papulonodular lesions, 5 showed ulceration and scarring. Mantoux test was strongly positive in all. Seven patients had systemic tuberculosis. On microscopy, necrosis was seen in 11 cases, varying from minimal to extensive. Epithelioid granulomas were common, except for 1 case with palisading and interstitial patterns. The infiltrate showed mostly lymphocytes, while 3 cases showed eosinophils. Vasculitis was seen in 8 cases. Two cases had dermal mucin, one also with interface dermatitis. This patient had concurrent LE. Mycobacterial DNA was detectable by PCR in 3 cases. Seven patients showed improvement/resolution of lesions on treatment. Conclusions: PNT is a rare disease. A positive PCR reiterates the question whether these are “tuberculids”. PNT may be better classified as true cutaneous tuberculosis and patients screened for systemic disease. Rajalakshmi TirumalaeInchira K. YeliurMeryl AntonyGeojith GeorgeJohn KennethMattioli1885articlecutaneous tuberculosispapulonecrotic tuberculidDermatologyRL1-803ENDermatology Practical & Conceptual (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cutaneous tuberculosis
papulonecrotic tuberculid
Dermatology
RL1-803
spellingShingle cutaneous tuberculosis
papulonecrotic tuberculid
Dermatology
RL1-803
Rajalakshmi Tirumalae
Inchira K. Yeliur
Meryl Antony
Geojith George
John Kenneth
Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
description Background: Papulonecrotic tuberculid (PNT) is said to be a hypersensitivity reaction to M. tuberculosis. Some reports indicate that organisms are demonstrable by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Methods: We describe 12 patients with PNT over 6 years. We reviewed the histopathologic features, clinical data and follow-up. PCR for M. tuberculosis DNA was done in all cases. Results: There were 7 men and 5 women. The ages ranged from 3-58 years. Upper limbs were commonly involved (8 cases). All patients had multiple papulonodular lesions, 5 showed ulceration and scarring. Mantoux test was strongly positive in all. Seven patients had systemic tuberculosis. On microscopy, necrosis was seen in 11 cases, varying from minimal to extensive. Epithelioid granulomas were common, except for 1 case with palisading and interstitial patterns. The infiltrate showed mostly lymphocytes, while 3 cases showed eosinophils. Vasculitis was seen in 8 cases. Two cases had dermal mucin, one also with interface dermatitis. This patient had concurrent LE. Mycobacterial DNA was detectable by PCR in 3 cases. Seven patients showed improvement/resolution of lesions on treatment. Conclusions: PNT is a rare disease. A positive PCR reiterates the question whether these are “tuberculids”. PNT may be better classified as true cutaneous tuberculosis and patients screened for systemic disease.
format article
author Rajalakshmi Tirumalae
Inchira K. Yeliur
Meryl Antony
Geojith George
John Kenneth
author_facet Rajalakshmi Tirumalae
Inchira K. Yeliur
Meryl Antony
Geojith George
John Kenneth
author_sort Rajalakshmi Tirumalae
title Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_short Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_full Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_fullStr Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_full_unstemmed Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_sort papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 indian patients
publisher Mattioli1885
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/2d1c360b764f4477b815cadb33a6f0ce
work_keys_str_mv AT rajalakshmitirumalae papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients
AT inchirakyeliur papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients
AT merylantony papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients
AT geojithgeorge papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients
AT johnkenneth papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients
_version_ 1718425660896051200