Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China
Introduction: Effective provision of ecosystem services (ES) and improvements in well-being of residents can be realized through policy interventions of stakeholder behavior. Of the several policies, market-based instruments (MBIs) have become the focus of global attention. Outcomes/others: To coupl...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2d3a3eccacb14590b35fd65556bceacc |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:2d3a3eccacb14590b35fd65556bceacc |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:2d3a3eccacb14590b35fd65556bceacc2021-12-02T16:16:38ZMarket-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China2332-887810.1080/20964129.2020.1835445https://doaj.org/article/2d3a3eccacb14590b35fd65556bceacc2020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2020.1835445https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878Introduction: Effective provision of ecosystem services (ES) and improvements in well-being of residents can be realized through policy interventions of stakeholder behavior. Of the several policies, market-based instruments (MBIs) have become the focus of global attention. Outcomes/others: To couple the theory with practice and solve the key problem of unclear definition of property rights, the framework of MBIs is designed. First, property rights of market creation must be clearly defined, verifiable, transferable, enforceable, and have policy continuity. Then, four key characteristics of MBIs need to be considered in the case design, namely those involving ES, stakeholders, trading mechanisms, and guarantee mechanisms. The Pledge Financing of the Right of the Ecological Public Welfare Forest (PFREPWF) in Lishui City is a typical case of China’s current marketization, which is a supplement and improvement to the ecological compensation policy. Based on clearly defined contract rights, Lishui City has realized the integration of ecological compensation and credit creation. Discussion: The case design still has the problems of lack of quantification and lack of correlations with ES. Conclusion: The theoretical and practical analysis around the market mechanism has reference value for solving market failures and providing environmental services.Xiaolong GaoWeihua XuYing HouZhiyun OuyangTaylor & Francis Grouparticlemarket-based instruments(mbis)market failuresecosystem services(es)ecological public welfare forestsEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcosystem Health and Sustainability, Vol 6, Iss 1 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
market-based instruments(mbis) market failures ecosystem services(es) ecological public welfare forests Ecology QH540-549.5 |
spellingShingle |
market-based instruments(mbis) market failures ecosystem services(es) ecological public welfare forests Ecology QH540-549.5 Xiaolong Gao Weihua Xu Ying Hou Zhiyun Ouyang Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China |
description |
Introduction: Effective provision of ecosystem services (ES) and improvements in well-being of residents can be realized through policy interventions of stakeholder behavior. Of the several policies, market-based instruments (MBIs) have become the focus of global attention. Outcomes/others: To couple the theory with practice and solve the key problem of unclear definition of property rights, the framework of MBIs is designed. First, property rights of market creation must be clearly defined, verifiable, transferable, enforceable, and have policy continuity. Then, four key characteristics of MBIs need to be considered in the case design, namely those involving ES, stakeholders, trading mechanisms, and guarantee mechanisms. The Pledge Financing of the Right of the Ecological Public Welfare Forest (PFREPWF) in Lishui City is a typical case of China’s current marketization, which is a supplement and improvement to the ecological compensation policy. Based on clearly defined contract rights, Lishui City has realized the integration of ecological compensation and credit creation. Discussion: The case design still has the problems of lack of quantification and lack of correlations with ES. Conclusion: The theoretical and practical analysis around the market mechanism has reference value for solving market failures and providing environmental services. |
format |
article |
author |
Xiaolong Gao Weihua Xu Ying Hou Zhiyun Ouyang |
author_facet |
Xiaolong Gao Weihua Xu Ying Hou Zhiyun Ouyang |
author_sort |
Xiaolong Gao |
title |
Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China |
title_short |
Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China |
title_full |
Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China |
title_fullStr |
Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in Lishui City, China |
title_sort |
market-based instruments for ecosystem services: framework and case study in lishui city, china |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/2d3a3eccacb14590b35fd65556bceacc |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xiaolonggao marketbasedinstrumentsforecosystemservicesframeworkandcasestudyinlishuicitychina AT weihuaxu marketbasedinstrumentsforecosystemservicesframeworkandcasestudyinlishuicitychina AT yinghou marketbasedinstrumentsforecosystemservicesframeworkandcasestudyinlishuicitychina AT zhiyunouyang marketbasedinstrumentsforecosystemservicesframeworkandcasestudyinlishuicitychina |
_version_ |
1718384282494304256 |