Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.

Studies investigating joint actions have suggested a central role for the putative mirror neuron system (pMNS) because of the close link between perception and action provided by these brain regions [1], [2], [3]. In contrast, our previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment demo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Idil Kokal, Christian Keysers
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2d47e64313d548e78a8ade1a93a31e31
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2d47e64313d548e78a8ade1a93a31e31
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2d47e64313d548e78a8ade1a93a31e312021-11-18T07:03:02ZGranger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0013507https://doaj.org/article/2d47e64313d548e78a8ade1a93a31e312010-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20975836/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Studies investigating joint actions have suggested a central role for the putative mirror neuron system (pMNS) because of the close link between perception and action provided by these brain regions [1], [2], [3]. In contrast, our previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment demonstrated that the BOLD response of the pMNS does not suggest that it directly integrates observed and executed actions during joint actions [4]. To test whether the pMNS might contribute indirectly to the integration process by sending information to brain areas responsible for this integration (integration network), here we used Granger causality mapping (GCM) [5]. We explored the directional information flow between the anterior sites of the pMNS and previously identified integrative brain regions. We found that the left BA44 sent more information than it received to both the integration network (left thalamus, right middle occipital gyrus and cerebellum) and more posterior nodes of the pMNS (BA2). Thus, during joint actions, two anatomically separate networks therefore seem effectively connected and the information flow is predominantly from anterior to posterior areas of the brain. These findings suggest that the pMNS is involved indirectly in joint actions by transforming observed and executed actions into a common code and is part of a generative model that could predict the future somatosensory and visual consequences of observed and executed actions in order to overcome otherwise inevitable neural delays.Idil KokalChristian KeysersPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 5, Iss 10, p e13507 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Idil Kokal
Christian Keysers
Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.
description Studies investigating joint actions have suggested a central role for the putative mirror neuron system (pMNS) because of the close link between perception and action provided by these brain regions [1], [2], [3]. In contrast, our previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment demonstrated that the BOLD response of the pMNS does not suggest that it directly integrates observed and executed actions during joint actions [4]. To test whether the pMNS might contribute indirectly to the integration process by sending information to brain areas responsible for this integration (integration network), here we used Granger causality mapping (GCM) [5]. We explored the directional information flow between the anterior sites of the pMNS and previously identified integrative brain regions. We found that the left BA44 sent more information than it received to both the integration network (left thalamus, right middle occipital gyrus and cerebellum) and more posterior nodes of the pMNS (BA2). Thus, during joint actions, two anatomically separate networks therefore seem effectively connected and the information flow is predominantly from anterior to posterior areas of the brain. These findings suggest that the pMNS is involved indirectly in joint actions by transforming observed and executed actions into a common code and is part of a generative model that could predict the future somatosensory and visual consequences of observed and executed actions in order to overcome otherwise inevitable neural delays.
format article
author Idil Kokal
Christian Keysers
author_facet Idil Kokal
Christian Keysers
author_sort Idil Kokal
title Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.
title_short Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.
title_full Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.
title_fullStr Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.
title_full_unstemmed Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.
title_sort granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/2d47e64313d548e78a8ade1a93a31e31
work_keys_str_mv AT idilkokal grangercausalitymappingduringjointactionsrevealsevidenceforforwardmodelsthatcouldovercomesensorymotordelays
AT christiankeysers grangercausalitymappingduringjointactionsrevealsevidenceforforwardmodelsthatcouldovercomesensorymotordelays
_version_ 1718423969002946560