Stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice

Abstract The influences of expertise and group size on an individual’s tendency to align with a majority opinion have been attributed to informational and normative conformity, respectively: Whereas the former refers to the treatment of others’ decisions as proxies for outcomes, the latter involves...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jordanne Greenberg, Mimi Liljeholm
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2d4dca9697594b549a3edceb35798952
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2d4dca9697594b549a3edceb35798952
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2d4dca9697594b549a3edceb357989522021-12-05T12:13:23ZStakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice10.1038/s41598-021-02793-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/2d4dca9697594b549a3edceb357989522021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02793-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The influences of expertise and group size on an individual’s tendency to align with a majority opinion have been attributed to informational and normative conformity, respectively: Whereas the former refers to the treatment of others’ decisions as proxies for outcomes, the latter involves positive affect elicited by group membership. In this study, using a social gambling task, we pitted alignment with a high- vs. low-expertise majority against a hypothetical monetary reward, thus relating conformity to a broader literature on valuation and choice, and probed the countering influence of a high-expertise minority opinion. We found that the expertise of a countering minority group significantly modulated alignment with a low-expertise majority, but only if such alignment did not come at a cost. Conversely, participants’ knowledge of payoff probabilities predicted the degree of majority alignment only when a high-expertise majority endorsed a more costly option. Implications for the relative influences of expertise and stakes on conformity are discussed.Jordanne GreenbergMimi LiljeholmNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jordanne Greenberg
Mimi Liljeholm
Stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice
description Abstract The influences of expertise and group size on an individual’s tendency to align with a majority opinion have been attributed to informational and normative conformity, respectively: Whereas the former refers to the treatment of others’ decisions as proxies for outcomes, the latter involves positive affect elicited by group membership. In this study, using a social gambling task, we pitted alignment with a high- vs. low-expertise majority against a hypothetical monetary reward, thus relating conformity to a broader literature on valuation and choice, and probed the countering influence of a high-expertise minority opinion. We found that the expertise of a countering minority group significantly modulated alignment with a low-expertise majority, but only if such alignment did not come at a cost. Conversely, participants’ knowledge of payoff probabilities predicted the degree of majority alignment only when a high-expertise majority endorsed a more costly option. Implications for the relative influences of expertise and stakes on conformity are discussed.
format article
author Jordanne Greenberg
Mimi Liljeholm
author_facet Jordanne Greenberg
Mimi Liljeholm
author_sort Jordanne Greenberg
title Stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice
title_short Stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice
title_full Stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice
title_fullStr Stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice
title_full_unstemmed Stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice
title_sort stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2d4dca9697594b549a3edceb35798952
work_keys_str_mv AT jordannegreenberg stakesandexpertisemodulateconformityineconomicchoice
AT mimililjeholm stakesandexpertisemodulateconformityineconomicchoice
_version_ 1718372123529969664