Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery
ABSTRACT The time-honored mechanism of allocating funds based on ranking of proposals by scientific peer review is no longer effective, because review panels cannot accurately stratify proposals to identify the most meritorious ones. Bias has a major influence on funding decisions, and the impact of...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Ferric C. Fang, Arturo Casadevall |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2d6a22d88a7f4b8082a6579774658283 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Erratum for Fang and Casadevall, Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery
por: Ferric C. Fang, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reply to “Funding by Lottery: Political Problems and Research Opportunities”
por: Arturo Casadevall, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Funding by Lottery: Political Problems and Research Opportunities
por: Adrian G. Barnett
Publicado: (2016) -
The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
por: Elisabeth M. Bik, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct
por: Ferric C. Fang, et al.
Publicado: (2013)