Estimating Bounds of Aerodynamic, Mass, and Auxiliary Load Impacts on Autonomous Vehicles: A Powertrain Simulation Approach

Vehicle automation requires new onboard sensors, communication equipment, and/or data processing units, and may encourage modifications to existing onboard components (such as the steering wheel). These changes impact the vehicle’s mass, auxiliary load, coefficient of drag, and frontal area, which t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuche Chen, Ruixiao Sun, Xuanke Wu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2d7a3f45935e4cd4ab06d311ae9ca831
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2d7a3f45935e4cd4ab06d311ae9ca831
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2d7a3f45935e4cd4ab06d311ae9ca8312021-11-25T19:00:47ZEstimating Bounds of Aerodynamic, Mass, and Auxiliary Load Impacts on Autonomous Vehicles: A Powertrain Simulation Approach10.3390/su1322124052071-1050https://doaj.org/article/2d7a3f45935e4cd4ab06d311ae9ca8312021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12405https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050Vehicle automation requires new onboard sensors, communication equipment, and/or data processing units, and may encourage modifications to existing onboard components (such as the steering wheel). These changes impact the vehicle’s mass, auxiliary load, coefficient of drag, and frontal area, which then change vehicle performance. This paper uses the powertrain simulation model FASTSim to quantify the impact of autonomy-related design changes on a vehicle’s fuel consumption. Levels 0, 2, and 5 autonomous vehicles are modeled for two battery-electric vehicles (2017 Chevrolet Bolt and 2017 Nissan Leaf) and a gasoline powered vehicle (2017 Toyota Corolla). Additionally, a level 5 vehicle is divided into pessimistic and optimistic scenarios which assume different electronic equipment integration format. The results show that 4–8% reductions in energy economy can be achieved in a L5 optimistic scenario and an 10–15% increase in energy economy will be the result in a L5 pessimistic scenario. When looking at impacts on different power demand sources, inertial power is the major power demand in urban driving conditions and aerodynamic power demand is the major demand in highway driving conditions.Yuche ChenRuixiao SunXuanke WuMDPI AGarticleautonomous vehiclesself-driving carsautonomyaerodynamic efficiencyEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12405, p 12405 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic autonomous vehicles
self-driving cars
autonomy
aerodynamic efficiency
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle autonomous vehicles
self-driving cars
autonomy
aerodynamic efficiency
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Yuche Chen
Ruixiao Sun
Xuanke Wu
Estimating Bounds of Aerodynamic, Mass, and Auxiliary Load Impacts on Autonomous Vehicles: A Powertrain Simulation Approach
description Vehicle automation requires new onboard sensors, communication equipment, and/or data processing units, and may encourage modifications to existing onboard components (such as the steering wheel). These changes impact the vehicle’s mass, auxiliary load, coefficient of drag, and frontal area, which then change vehicle performance. This paper uses the powertrain simulation model FASTSim to quantify the impact of autonomy-related design changes on a vehicle’s fuel consumption. Levels 0, 2, and 5 autonomous vehicles are modeled for two battery-electric vehicles (2017 Chevrolet Bolt and 2017 Nissan Leaf) and a gasoline powered vehicle (2017 Toyota Corolla). Additionally, a level 5 vehicle is divided into pessimistic and optimistic scenarios which assume different electronic equipment integration format. The results show that 4–8% reductions in energy economy can be achieved in a L5 optimistic scenario and an 10–15% increase in energy economy will be the result in a L5 pessimistic scenario. When looking at impacts on different power demand sources, inertial power is the major power demand in urban driving conditions and aerodynamic power demand is the major demand in highway driving conditions.
format article
author Yuche Chen
Ruixiao Sun
Xuanke Wu
author_facet Yuche Chen
Ruixiao Sun
Xuanke Wu
author_sort Yuche Chen
title Estimating Bounds of Aerodynamic, Mass, and Auxiliary Load Impacts on Autonomous Vehicles: A Powertrain Simulation Approach
title_short Estimating Bounds of Aerodynamic, Mass, and Auxiliary Load Impacts on Autonomous Vehicles: A Powertrain Simulation Approach
title_full Estimating Bounds of Aerodynamic, Mass, and Auxiliary Load Impacts on Autonomous Vehicles: A Powertrain Simulation Approach
title_fullStr Estimating Bounds of Aerodynamic, Mass, and Auxiliary Load Impacts on Autonomous Vehicles: A Powertrain Simulation Approach
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Bounds of Aerodynamic, Mass, and Auxiliary Load Impacts on Autonomous Vehicles: A Powertrain Simulation Approach
title_sort estimating bounds of aerodynamic, mass, and auxiliary load impacts on autonomous vehicles: a powertrain simulation approach
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2d7a3f45935e4cd4ab06d311ae9ca831
work_keys_str_mv AT yuchechen estimatingboundsofaerodynamicmassandauxiliaryloadimpactsonautonomousvehiclesapowertrainsimulationapproach
AT ruixiaosun estimatingboundsofaerodynamicmassandauxiliaryloadimpactsonautonomousvehiclesapowertrainsimulationapproach
AT xuankewu estimatingboundsofaerodynamicmassandauxiliaryloadimpactsonautonomousvehiclesapowertrainsimulationapproach
_version_ 1718410393161826304