The older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Older people are the fastest-growing demographic group among prisoners in England and Wales and they have complex health and social care needs. Their care is frequently ad hoc and uncoordinated. No previous research has explored how to identify and appropriately address the needs...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katrina Forsyth, Roger T. Webb, Laura Archer Power, Richard Emsley, Jane Senior, Alistair Burns, David Challis, Adrian Hayes, Rachel Meacock, Elizabeth Walsh, Stuart Ware, Jenny Shaw
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Old
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2d9fed384df8495398ccff4917c776b4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2d9fed384df8495398ccff4917c776b4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2d9fed384df8495398ccff4917c776b42021-11-14T12:14:06ZThe older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial10.1186/s12889-021-11965-51471-2458https://doaj.org/article/2d9fed384df8495398ccff4917c776b42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11965-5https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458Abstract Background Older people are the fastest-growing demographic group among prisoners in England and Wales and they have complex health and social care needs. Their care is frequently ad hoc and uncoordinated. No previous research has explored how to identify and appropriately address the needs of older adults in prison. We hypothesised that the Older prisoner Health and Social Care Assessment and Plan (OHSCAP) would significantly increase the proportion of met health and social care needs 3 months after prison entry, compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Methods The study was a parallel randomised controlled trial (RCT) recruiting male prisoners aged 50 and over from 10 prisons in northern England. Participants received the OHSCAP or TAU. A clinical trials unit used minimisation with a random element as the allocation procedure. Data analysis was conducted blind to allocation status. The intervention group had their needs assessed using the OHSCAP tool and care plans were devised; processes that lasted approximately 30 min in total per prisoner. TAU included the standard prison health assessment and care. The intention to treat principle was followed. The trial was registered with the UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio (ISRCTN ID: 11841493) and was closed on 30 November 2016. Results Data were collected between 28 January 2014 and 06 April 2016. Two hundred and forty nine older prisoners were assigned TAU of which 32 transferred prison; 12 were released; 2 withdrew and 1 was deemed unsafe to interview. Two hundred and fifty three 3 prisoners were assigned the OHSCAP of which 33 transferred prison; 11 were released; 6 withdrew and 1 was deemed unsafe to interview. Consequently, data from 202 participants were analysed in each of the two groups. There were no significant differences in the number of unmet needs as measured by the Camberwell Assessment of Needs – Forensic Short Version (CANFOR-S). The mean number of unmet needs for the OHSCAP group at follow-up was 2.03 (SD = 2.07) and 2.06 (SD = 2.11) for the TAU group (mean difference = 0.088; 95% CI − 0.276 to 0.449, p = 0.621). No adverse events were reported. Conclusion The OHSCAP was fundamentally not implemented as planned, partly due to the national prison staffing crisis that ensued during the study period. Therefore, those receiving the OHSCAP did not experience improved outcomes compared to those who received TAU. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN11841493 , 25/10/2012.Katrina ForsythRoger T. WebbLaura Archer PowerRichard EmsleyJane SeniorAlistair BurnsDavid ChallisAdrian HayesRachel MeacockElizabeth WalshStuart WareJenny ShawBMCarticleOldPrisonHealthSocial careAssessmentCare planningPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENBMC Public Health, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Old
Prison
Health
Social care
Assessment
Care planning
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Old
Prison
Health
Social care
Assessment
Care planning
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Katrina Forsyth
Roger T. Webb
Laura Archer Power
Richard Emsley
Jane Senior
Alistair Burns
David Challis
Adrian Hayes
Rachel Meacock
Elizabeth Walsh
Stuart Ware
Jenny Shaw
The older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial
description Abstract Background Older people are the fastest-growing demographic group among prisoners in England and Wales and they have complex health and social care needs. Their care is frequently ad hoc and uncoordinated. No previous research has explored how to identify and appropriately address the needs of older adults in prison. We hypothesised that the Older prisoner Health and Social Care Assessment and Plan (OHSCAP) would significantly increase the proportion of met health and social care needs 3 months after prison entry, compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Methods The study was a parallel randomised controlled trial (RCT) recruiting male prisoners aged 50 and over from 10 prisons in northern England. Participants received the OHSCAP or TAU. A clinical trials unit used minimisation with a random element as the allocation procedure. Data analysis was conducted blind to allocation status. The intervention group had their needs assessed using the OHSCAP tool and care plans were devised; processes that lasted approximately 30 min in total per prisoner. TAU included the standard prison health assessment and care. The intention to treat principle was followed. The trial was registered with the UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio (ISRCTN ID: 11841493) and was closed on 30 November 2016. Results Data were collected between 28 January 2014 and 06 April 2016. Two hundred and forty nine older prisoners were assigned TAU of which 32 transferred prison; 12 were released; 2 withdrew and 1 was deemed unsafe to interview. Two hundred and fifty three 3 prisoners were assigned the OHSCAP of which 33 transferred prison; 11 were released; 6 withdrew and 1 was deemed unsafe to interview. Consequently, data from 202 participants were analysed in each of the two groups. There were no significant differences in the number of unmet needs as measured by the Camberwell Assessment of Needs – Forensic Short Version (CANFOR-S). The mean number of unmet needs for the OHSCAP group at follow-up was 2.03 (SD = 2.07) and 2.06 (SD = 2.11) for the TAU group (mean difference = 0.088; 95% CI − 0.276 to 0.449, p = 0.621). No adverse events were reported. Conclusion The OHSCAP was fundamentally not implemented as planned, partly due to the national prison staffing crisis that ensued during the study period. Therefore, those receiving the OHSCAP did not experience improved outcomes compared to those who received TAU. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN11841493 , 25/10/2012.
format article
author Katrina Forsyth
Roger T. Webb
Laura Archer Power
Richard Emsley
Jane Senior
Alistair Burns
David Challis
Adrian Hayes
Rachel Meacock
Elizabeth Walsh
Stuart Ware
Jenny Shaw
author_facet Katrina Forsyth
Roger T. Webb
Laura Archer Power
Richard Emsley
Jane Senior
Alistair Burns
David Challis
Adrian Hayes
Rachel Meacock
Elizabeth Walsh
Stuart Ware
Jenny Shaw
author_sort Katrina Forsyth
title The older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial
title_short The older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial
title_full The older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (ohscap) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2d9fed384df8495398ccff4917c776b4
work_keys_str_mv AT katrinaforsyth theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rogertwebb theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lauraarcherpower theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT richardemsley theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janesenior theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alistairburns theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT davidchallis theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adrianhayes theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rachelmeacock theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT elizabethwalsh theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stuartware theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jennyshaw theolderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT katrinaforsyth olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rogertwebb olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lauraarcherpower olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT richardemsley olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janesenior olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alistairburns olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT davidchallis olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adrianhayes olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rachelmeacock olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT elizabethwalsh olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stuartware olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jennyshaw olderprisonerhealthandsocialcareassessmentandplanohscapversustreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718429337856770048