TABARÎ’S APPROACH TO THE JURISPRUDENCE AND ABROGATION

Tabarî, who devoted a big part of his long life -approximately ninety years- to the Islamic sciences, educated himself on all Islamic sciences and came out with precious, original and voluminous works on this field. He got interested with a high enthusiasm in jurisprudence, completed his jurispruden...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Naif YAŞAR
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR TR
Publicado:	Fırat University 2019
Materias:	taberî jurisprudence taberî and abrogation Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2daef6cc2627487790dddfba9644a9e3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2daef6cc2627487790dddfba9644a9e3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2daef6cc2627487790dddfba9644a9e32021-11-24T09:20:53ZTABARÎ’S APPROACH TO THE JURISPRUDENCE AND ABROGATION2148-416310.9761/JASSS3129https://doaj.org/article/2daef6cc2627487790dddfba9644a9e32019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=29768717_21-Dr.%20Naif%20YA%C5%9EAR.pdf&key=27645https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163Tabarî, who devoted a big part of his long life -approximately ninety years- to the Islamic sciences, educated himself on all Islamic sciences and came out with precious, original and voluminous works on this field. He got interested with a high enthusiasm in jurisprudence, completed his jurisprudence education by particaipating to the numerious teachers’ lessons in Baghdad and became an important jurist and imam of the Madhhab Cerîriyya. When treating the controversial topics on the jurisprudence Tabarî interweave them if it is possible but if it isn’t possible to interweave them he generally chooses the view which is the easiest one for the community. When we examine his preferences about the controversial topics, we notice that he keeps in mind the objective of the sharia and accordingly he supports that facilitating the rules of sharia is the right attitude at this point. And also when examining the abrogation, he rejects the claims of abrogation in the verses in question as long as it is possible to interpret and integrate the abrogator and abrogated verses in a way or other. But if this is not possible he accepts the claims about abrogation. Because in his opinion, in order to claim that a verse is abrogator and an other is abrogated, a complete contradiction must occur between these verses and it must not be possible to interpret and integrate them in way or other to make their rules relevent. That is way, in his exegesis, he proved that a lot of verses which were claimed to be abrogated actually are not abrogated. So, the aim of this article is to show Tabarî’s method of jurisprudence and his abrogation approach through his methodology accompanied by examples.Naif YAŞARFırat Universityarticletaberîjurisprudencetaberî and abrogationSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 8, Iss 40, Pp 321-335 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	taberî jurisprudence taberî and abrogation Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	taberî jurisprudence taberî and abrogation Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Naif YAŞAR TABARÎ’S APPROACH TO THE JURISPRUDENCE AND ABROGATION
description	Tabarî, who devoted a big part of his long life -approximately ninety years- to the Islamic sciences, educated himself on all Islamic sciences and came out with precious, original and voluminous works on this field. He got interested with a high enthusiasm in jurisprudence, completed his jurisprudence education by particaipating to the numerious teachers’ lessons in Baghdad and became an important jurist and imam of the Madhhab Cerîriyya. When treating the controversial topics on the jurisprudence Tabarî interweave them if it is possible but if it isn’t possible to interweave them he generally chooses the view which is the easiest one for the community. When we examine his preferences about the controversial topics, we notice that he keeps in mind the objective of the sharia and accordingly he supports that facilitating the rules of sharia is the right attitude at this point. And also when examining the abrogation, he rejects the claims of abrogation in the verses in question as long as it is possible to interpret and integrate the abrogator and abrogated verses in a way or other. But if this is not possible he accepts the claims about abrogation. Because in his opinion, in order to claim that a verse is abrogator and an other is abrogated, a complete contradiction must occur between these verses and it must not be possible to interpret and integrate them in way or other to make their rules relevent. That is way, in his exegesis, he proved that a lot of verses which were claimed to be abrogated actually are not abrogated. So, the aim of this article is to show Tabarî’s method of jurisprudence and his abrogation approach through his methodology accompanied by examples.
format	article
author	Naif YAŞAR
author_facet	Naif YAŞAR
author_sort	Naif YAŞAR
title	TABARÎ’S APPROACH TO THE JURISPRUDENCE AND ABROGATION
title_short	TABARÎ’S APPROACH TO THE JURISPRUDENCE AND ABROGATION
title_full	TABARÎ’S APPROACH TO THE JURISPRUDENCE AND ABROGATION
title_fullStr	TABARÎ’S APPROACH TO THE JURISPRUDENCE AND ABROGATION
title_full_unstemmed	TABARÎ’S APPROACH TO THE JURISPRUDENCE AND ABROGATION
title_sort	tabarî’s approach to the jurisprudence and abrogation
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/2daef6cc2627487790dddfba9644a9e3
work_keys_str_mv	AT naifyasar tabarisapproachtothejurisprudenceandabrogation
_version_	1718415409016733696

TABARÎ’S APPROACH TO THE JURISPRUDENCE AND ABROGATION

Ejemplares similares