ŞEM’Î ŞEM’ULLÂH AND HİS ŞERH-İ SUBHATÜ’L-EBRÂR

Şem’î , who lived in the second half of the 16th century, has joined the procreative commentators of the classical commentary literature after commentating 11 works from the Persian literature in Turkish. Among these, Subhatü’l-Ebrâr commentary, which is considered to be one of the most original wor...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Taner GÖK
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR TR
Publicado:	Fırat University 2019
Materias:	şem’î translation commentary Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2db2af324d5b49f18877c122a2997139
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2db2af324d5b49f18877c122a2997139
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2db2af324d5b49f18877c122a29971392021-11-24T09:21:00ZŞEM’Î ŞEM’ULLÂH AND HİS ŞERH-İ SUBHATÜ’L-EBRÂR2148-4163https://doaj.org/article/2db2af324d5b49f18877c122a29971392019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=488334462_27-Ar%C5%9F.%20G%C3%B6r.%20Taner%20G%C3%B6k.pdf&key=27061https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163Şem’î , who lived in the second half of the 16th century, has joined the procreative commentators of the classical commentary literature after commentating 11 works from the Persian literature in Turkish. Among these, Subhatü’l-Ebrâr commentary, which is considered to be one of the most original works of Molla Abdurrahman Câmî, a famous name in the Persian literature, is the only commentary of this work in the field of Anatolia. In our study, we included reviews and assessments that would enable understanding of the Şerh-i Subhatü’l-Ebrâr at the maximum level possible and we aimed at identifying every aspect of the technical characteristics and the content of this commentary. For this purpose, after providing information about Şem’î Şem’ullâh and Subhatü’l-Ebrâr in our study, we focused on the copies of Subhatü’l-Ebrâr, the content of the work, and the commentary styles used in the work. Inclusion of translations rather than long explanations, which is not very common in the commentary tradition of the period, is the most notable feature of Şerh-i Subhatü’l-Ebrâr. In addition to this, multiple translations of some of the Persian couplets while considering different commentary possibilities and provision of approximately 200 exemplary couplets to allow better understanding of the explanations included in the commentary are other important features of this commentary. Şem’î is one of the most mentioned commentators in the refutation tradition of the classical commentary literature. Several commentators wrote a refutation to Şem’î on various subjects. Şem’î not attaching much importance to the criticisms responded to these criticisms only in Şerh-i Subhatü’l-Ebrâr’. As a result of this situation; there exists valuable information in Şerh-i Subhatü’l-Ebrâr’ related to the criticism understanding of the period and also the style of Şem’î’ defending his works. In addition to these; in our article, we tried to determine the factors that helped Şem’î’ shape his commentary style.Taner GÖKFırat Universityarticleşem’îtranslationcommentarySocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 7, Iss 24, Pp 411-426 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	şem’î translation commentary Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	şem’î translation commentary Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Taner GÖK ŞEM’Î ŞEM’ULLÂH AND HİS ŞERH-İ SUBHATÜ’L-EBRÂR
description	Şem’î , who lived in the second half of the 16th century, has joined the procreative commentators of the classical commentary literature after commentating 11 works from the Persian literature in Turkish. Among these, Subhatü’l-Ebrâr commentary, which is considered to be one of the most original works of Molla Abdurrahman Câmî, a famous name in the Persian literature, is the only commentary of this work in the field of Anatolia. In our study, we included reviews and assessments that would enable understanding of the Şerh-i Subhatü’l-Ebrâr at the maximum level possible and we aimed at identifying every aspect of the technical characteristics and the content of this commentary. For this purpose, after providing information about Şem’î Şem’ullâh and Subhatü’l-Ebrâr in our study, we focused on the copies of Subhatü’l-Ebrâr, the content of the work, and the commentary styles used in the work. Inclusion of translations rather than long explanations, which is not very common in the commentary tradition of the period, is the most notable feature of Şerh-i Subhatü’l-Ebrâr. In addition to this, multiple translations of some of the Persian couplets while considering different commentary possibilities and provision of approximately 200 exemplary couplets to allow better understanding of the explanations included in the commentary are other important features of this commentary. Şem’î is one of the most mentioned commentators in the refutation tradition of the classical commentary literature. Several commentators wrote a refutation to Şem’î on various subjects. Şem’î not attaching much importance to the criticisms responded to these criticisms only in Şerh-i Subhatü’l-Ebrâr’. As a result of this situation; there exists valuable information in Şerh-i Subhatü’l-Ebrâr’ related to the criticism understanding of the period and also the style of Şem’î’ defending his works. In addition to these; in our article, we tried to determine the factors that helped Şem’î’ shape his commentary style.
format	article
author	Taner GÖK
author_facet	Taner GÖK
author_sort	Taner GÖK
title	ŞEM’Î ŞEM’ULLÂH AND HİS ŞERH-İ SUBHATÜ’L-EBRÂR
title_short	ŞEM’Î ŞEM’ULLÂH AND HİS ŞERH-İ SUBHATÜ’L-EBRÂR
title_full	ŞEM’Î ŞEM’ULLÂH AND HİS ŞERH-İ SUBHATÜ’L-EBRÂR
title_fullStr	ŞEM’Î ŞEM’ULLÂH AND HİS ŞERH-İ SUBHATÜ’L-EBRÂR
title_full_unstemmed	ŞEM’Î ŞEM’ULLÂH AND HİS ŞERH-İ SUBHATÜ’L-EBRÂR
title_sort	şem’î şem’ullâh and hi̇s şerh-i̇ subhatü’l-ebrâr
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/2db2af324d5b49f18877c122a2997139
work_keys_str_mv	AT tanergok semisemullahandhisserhisubhatulebrar
_version_	1718415283418300416

ŞEM’Î ŞEM’ULLÂH AND HİS ŞERH-İ SUBHATÜ’L-EBRÂR

Ejemplares similares