Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches

In rotator cuff repair, strong and reliable suturing is necessary to decrease failure rates. The biomechanics of two self-cinching stitches – the single-loop knot stitch (SLKS) and the double-loop knot stitch (DLKS) – and the modified Mason-Allen stitch (mMAS) were compared. Twenty-seven porcine inf...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frosch Stephan, Buchhorn Gottfried, Kück Fabian, Walde Tim Alexander, Lehmann Wolfgang, Spering Christopher
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2dc0114215c447e2810a37d946310a5c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2dc0114215c447e2810a37d946310a5c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2dc0114215c447e2810a37d946310a5c2021-12-05T14:10:53ZBiomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches2391-546310.1515/med-2021-0211https://doaj.org/article/2dc0114215c447e2810a37d946310a5c2021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0211https://doaj.org/toc/2391-5463In rotator cuff repair, strong and reliable suturing is necessary to decrease failure rates. The biomechanics of two self-cinching stitches – the single-loop knot stitch (SLKS) and the double-loop knot stitch (DLKS) – and the modified Mason-Allen stitch (mMAS) were compared. Twenty-seven porcine infraspinatus tendons were randomized among the three stitches. Each was cyclically loaded (10–80–200 N for 50 cycles each) while the gap formation was measured. Next, ultimate load to failure was tested. The gap widths after cyclic loading were 8.72 ± 0.93 mm for the DLKS, 8.65 ± 1.33 mm for the mMAS, and 9.14 ± 0.89 mm for the SLKS, without significant differences. The DLKS showed the highest ultimate load (350.52 ± 38.54 N) compared with the mMAS (320.88 ± 53.29 N; p = 0.304) and the SLKS (290.54 ± 60.51 N; p < 0.05). The DLKS showed similar reliability and better strength compared with the mMAS, while the SLKS showed a slight but not significant decrease in performance. In our experience, the DLKS and SLKS have clinical advantages, as they are easy to perform and the self-cinching loop knot allows the surgeon to grasp degenerative tendon tissue. Initial intraoperative tightening of the suture complex (preloading) before locking is important in order to decrease postoperative elongation.Frosch StephanBuchhorn GottfriedKück FabianWalde Tim AlexanderLehmann WolfgangSpering ChristopherDe Gruyterarticlerotator cuff repairsuture techniquestendon repaircyclic loadingultimate loadMedicineRENOpen Medicine, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 293-298 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic rotator cuff repair
suture techniques
tendon repair
cyclic loading
ultimate load
Medicine
R
spellingShingle rotator cuff repair
suture techniques
tendon repair
cyclic loading
ultimate load
Medicine
R
Frosch Stephan
Buchhorn Gottfried
Kück Fabian
Walde Tim Alexander
Lehmann Wolfgang
Spering Christopher
Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches
description In rotator cuff repair, strong and reliable suturing is necessary to decrease failure rates. The biomechanics of two self-cinching stitches – the single-loop knot stitch (SLKS) and the double-loop knot stitch (DLKS) – and the modified Mason-Allen stitch (mMAS) were compared. Twenty-seven porcine infraspinatus tendons were randomized among the three stitches. Each was cyclically loaded (10–80–200 N for 50 cycles each) while the gap formation was measured. Next, ultimate load to failure was tested. The gap widths after cyclic loading were 8.72 ± 0.93 mm for the DLKS, 8.65 ± 1.33 mm for the mMAS, and 9.14 ± 0.89 mm for the SLKS, without significant differences. The DLKS showed the highest ultimate load (350.52 ± 38.54 N) compared with the mMAS (320.88 ± 53.29 N; p = 0.304) and the SLKS (290.54 ± 60.51 N; p < 0.05). The DLKS showed similar reliability and better strength compared with the mMAS, while the SLKS showed a slight but not significant decrease in performance. In our experience, the DLKS and SLKS have clinical advantages, as they are easy to perform and the self-cinching loop knot allows the surgeon to grasp degenerative tendon tissue. Initial intraoperative tightening of the suture complex (preloading) before locking is important in order to decrease postoperative elongation.
format article
author Frosch Stephan
Buchhorn Gottfried
Kück Fabian
Walde Tim Alexander
Lehmann Wolfgang
Spering Christopher
author_facet Frosch Stephan
Buchhorn Gottfried
Kück Fabian
Walde Tim Alexander
Lehmann Wolfgang
Spering Christopher
author_sort Frosch Stephan
title Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: the single-loop and double-loop knot stitches
publisher De Gruyter
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2dc0114215c447e2810a37d946310a5c
work_keys_str_mv AT froschstephan biomechanicalevaluationofselfcinchingstitchtechniquesinrotatorcuffrepairthesingleloopanddoubleloopknotstitches
AT buchhorngottfried biomechanicalevaluationofselfcinchingstitchtechniquesinrotatorcuffrepairthesingleloopanddoubleloopknotstitches
AT kuckfabian biomechanicalevaluationofselfcinchingstitchtechniquesinrotatorcuffrepairthesingleloopanddoubleloopknotstitches
AT waldetimalexander biomechanicalevaluationofselfcinchingstitchtechniquesinrotatorcuffrepairthesingleloopanddoubleloopknotstitches
AT lehmannwolfgang biomechanicalevaluationofselfcinchingstitchtechniquesinrotatorcuffrepairthesingleloopanddoubleloopknotstitches
AT speringchristopher biomechanicalevaluationofselfcinchingstitchtechniquesinrotatorcuffrepairthesingleloopanddoubleloopknotstitches
_version_ 1718371593216851968