The Role of STEM Program Directors in Broadening the Impact of STEM Interventions

STEM transformation has been a longstanding goal for higher education institutions who not only wish to maintain global economic competitiveness but most recently have also aimed efforts at achieving STEM equity. While researchers have typically looked to students’ and faculty’s experiences for answ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ana Karen Gomez, Krystle Palma Cobian, Sylvia Hurtado
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2df48e31292b40c1bd09ab1469e7d979
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2df48e31292b40c1bd09ab1469e7d979
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2df48e31292b40c1bd09ab1469e7d9792021-11-25T17:23:52ZThe Role of STEM Program Directors in Broadening the Impact of STEM Interventions10.3390/educsci111107422227-7102https://doaj.org/article/2df48e31292b40c1bd09ab1469e7d9792021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/11/742https://doaj.org/toc/2227-7102STEM transformation has been a longstanding goal for higher education institutions who not only wish to maintain global economic competitiveness but most recently have also aimed efforts at achieving STEM equity. While researchers have typically looked to students’ and faculty’s experiences for answers, STEM program directors possess great insight from working closely with students in both faculty and administrative roles. This study explores the views of 45 STEM program directors at 10 institutions across the U.S. that had high STEM bachelor’s degree-completion rates relative to similarly resourced institutions. We document the lessons and strategies that STEM program directors have used to broaden institutional impact, including demonstrating their program’s efficacy through assessments and evaluations, coordinating, and streamlining efforts to ensure program efficiency and longevity, incentivizing support for labor, and consolidating support from institutional leaders. We also disentangle the roles STEM program directors play as grassroots leaders or institutional agents, distinguishing them by their authority and decision-making power and by whether they work to transform the institution to better serve students or to transform students’ behaviors to adapt to the institution. Our findings provide avenues to leverage STEM program directors’ efforts in order to move toward STEM education transformation in higher education.Ana Karen GomezKrystle Palma CobianSylvia HurtadoMDPI AGarticleSTEM educationequitydiversityinstitutional changeEducationLENEducation Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 742, p 742 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic STEM education
equity
diversity
institutional change
Education
L
spellingShingle STEM education
equity
diversity
institutional change
Education
L
Ana Karen Gomez
Krystle Palma Cobian
Sylvia Hurtado
The Role of STEM Program Directors in Broadening the Impact of STEM Interventions
description STEM transformation has been a longstanding goal for higher education institutions who not only wish to maintain global economic competitiveness but most recently have also aimed efforts at achieving STEM equity. While researchers have typically looked to students’ and faculty’s experiences for answers, STEM program directors possess great insight from working closely with students in both faculty and administrative roles. This study explores the views of 45 STEM program directors at 10 institutions across the U.S. that had high STEM bachelor’s degree-completion rates relative to similarly resourced institutions. We document the lessons and strategies that STEM program directors have used to broaden institutional impact, including demonstrating their program’s efficacy through assessments and evaluations, coordinating, and streamlining efforts to ensure program efficiency and longevity, incentivizing support for labor, and consolidating support from institutional leaders. We also disentangle the roles STEM program directors play as grassroots leaders or institutional agents, distinguishing them by their authority and decision-making power and by whether they work to transform the institution to better serve students or to transform students’ behaviors to adapt to the institution. Our findings provide avenues to leverage STEM program directors’ efforts in order to move toward STEM education transformation in higher education.
format article
author Ana Karen Gomez
Krystle Palma Cobian
Sylvia Hurtado
author_facet Ana Karen Gomez
Krystle Palma Cobian
Sylvia Hurtado
author_sort Ana Karen Gomez
title The Role of STEM Program Directors in Broadening the Impact of STEM Interventions
title_short The Role of STEM Program Directors in Broadening the Impact of STEM Interventions
title_full The Role of STEM Program Directors in Broadening the Impact of STEM Interventions
title_fullStr The Role of STEM Program Directors in Broadening the Impact of STEM Interventions
title_full_unstemmed The Role of STEM Program Directors in Broadening the Impact of STEM Interventions
title_sort role of stem program directors in broadening the impact of stem interventions
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2df48e31292b40c1bd09ab1469e7d979
work_keys_str_mv AT anakarengomez theroleofstemprogramdirectorsinbroadeningtheimpactofsteminterventions
AT krystlepalmacobian theroleofstemprogramdirectorsinbroadeningtheimpactofsteminterventions
AT sylviahurtado theroleofstemprogramdirectorsinbroadeningtheimpactofsteminterventions
AT anakarengomez roleofstemprogramdirectorsinbroadeningtheimpactofsteminterventions
AT krystlepalmacobian roleofstemprogramdirectorsinbroadeningtheimpactofsteminterventions
AT sylviahurtado roleofstemprogramdirectorsinbroadeningtheimpactofsteminterventions
_version_ 1718412398348468224