Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations
This study uses social network analysis and the classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS) to characterize six research-based introductory physics curricula. Peer Instruction, Modeling Instruction, ISLE, SCALE-UP, Context-Rich Problems, and Tutorials in Introductory Physics were i...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Physical Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a3234817 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a3234817 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a32348172021-11-22T16:26:42ZCharacterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.0201362469-9896https://doaj.org/article/2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a32348172021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136https://doaj.org/toc/2469-9896This study uses social network analysis and the classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS) to characterize six research-based introductory physics curricula. Peer Instruction, Modeling Instruction, ISLE, SCALE-UP, Context-Rich Problems, and Tutorials in Introductory Physics were investigated. Students in each curriculum were given a survey at the beginning and end of term, asking them to self-identify peers with whom they had meaningful interactions in class. Every curriculum showed an increase in the average number of student connections from the beginning of term to the end of term, with the largest increase occurring in Modeling Instruction, SCALE-UP, and Context-Rich Problems. Modeling Instruction was the only curriculum with a drastic change in how tightly connected the student network was. Transitivity increased for all curricula except Peer Instruction. We also spent one week per research site in the middle of the term observing courses using COPUS. From these observations, the student COPUS profiles look nearly the same for Tutorials, ISLE recitations, and Context-Rich Problems discussion sections. This is likely due to the large resolution of activities that can be coded as “other group activity,” suggesting the need for a more detailed observation instrument.Kelley CommefordEric BreweAdrienne TraxlerAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 17, Iss 2, p 020136 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Physics QC1-999 |
spellingShingle |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Physics QC1-999 Kelley Commeford Eric Brewe Adrienne Traxler Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations |
description |
This study uses social network analysis and the classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS) to characterize six research-based introductory physics curricula. Peer Instruction, Modeling Instruction, ISLE, SCALE-UP, Context-Rich Problems, and Tutorials in Introductory Physics were investigated. Students in each curriculum were given a survey at the beginning and end of term, asking them to self-identify peers with whom they had meaningful interactions in class. Every curriculum showed an increase in the average number of student connections from the beginning of term to the end of term, with the largest increase occurring in Modeling Instruction, SCALE-UP, and Context-Rich Problems. Modeling Instruction was the only curriculum with a drastic change in how tightly connected the student network was. Transitivity increased for all curricula except Peer Instruction. We also spent one week per research site in the middle of the term observing courses using COPUS. From these observations, the student COPUS profiles look nearly the same for Tutorials, ISLE recitations, and Context-Rich Problems discussion sections. This is likely due to the large resolution of activities that can be coded as “other group activity,” suggesting the need for a more detailed observation instrument. |
format |
article |
author |
Kelley Commeford Eric Brewe Adrienne Traxler |
author_facet |
Kelley Commeford Eric Brewe Adrienne Traxler |
author_sort |
Kelley Commeford |
title |
Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations |
title_short |
Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations |
title_full |
Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations |
title_fullStr |
Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations |
title_sort |
characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations |
publisher |
American Physical Society |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a3234817 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kelleycommeford characterizingactivelearningenvironmentsinphysicsusingnetworkanalysisandclassroomobservations AT ericbrewe characterizingactivelearningenvironmentsinphysicsusingnetworkanalysisandclassroomobservations AT adriennetraxler characterizingactivelearningenvironmentsinphysicsusingnetworkanalysisandclassroomobservations |
_version_ |
1718417484306972672 |