Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations

This study uses social network analysis and the classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS) to characterize six research-based introductory physics curricula. Peer Instruction, Modeling Instruction, ISLE, SCALE-UP, Context-Rich Problems, and Tutorials in Introductory Physics were i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelley Commeford, Eric Brewe, Adrienne Traxler
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a3234817
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a3234817
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a32348172021-11-22T16:26:42ZCharacterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.0201362469-9896https://doaj.org/article/2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a32348172021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020136https://doaj.org/toc/2469-9896This study uses social network analysis and the classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS) to characterize six research-based introductory physics curricula. Peer Instruction, Modeling Instruction, ISLE, SCALE-UP, Context-Rich Problems, and Tutorials in Introductory Physics were investigated. Students in each curriculum were given a survey at the beginning and end of term, asking them to self-identify peers with whom they had meaningful interactions in class. Every curriculum showed an increase in the average number of student connections from the beginning of term to the end of term, with the largest increase occurring in Modeling Instruction, SCALE-UP, and Context-Rich Problems. Modeling Instruction was the only curriculum with a drastic change in how tightly connected the student network was. Transitivity increased for all curricula except Peer Instruction. We also spent one week per research site in the middle of the term observing courses using COPUS. From these observations, the student COPUS profiles look nearly the same for Tutorials, ISLE recitations, and Context-Rich Problems discussion sections. This is likely due to the large resolution of activities that can be coded as “other group activity,” suggesting the need for a more detailed observation instrument.Kelley CommefordEric BreweAdrienne TraxlerAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 17, Iss 2, p 020136 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
Kelley Commeford
Eric Brewe
Adrienne Traxler
Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations
description This study uses social network analysis and the classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS) to characterize six research-based introductory physics curricula. Peer Instruction, Modeling Instruction, ISLE, SCALE-UP, Context-Rich Problems, and Tutorials in Introductory Physics were investigated. Students in each curriculum were given a survey at the beginning and end of term, asking them to self-identify peers with whom they had meaningful interactions in class. Every curriculum showed an increase in the average number of student connections from the beginning of term to the end of term, with the largest increase occurring in Modeling Instruction, SCALE-UP, and Context-Rich Problems. Modeling Instruction was the only curriculum with a drastic change in how tightly connected the student network was. Transitivity increased for all curricula except Peer Instruction. We also spent one week per research site in the middle of the term observing courses using COPUS. From these observations, the student COPUS profiles look nearly the same for Tutorials, ISLE recitations, and Context-Rich Problems discussion sections. This is likely due to the large resolution of activities that can be coded as “other group activity,” suggesting the need for a more detailed observation instrument.
format article
author Kelley Commeford
Eric Brewe
Adrienne Traxler
author_facet Kelley Commeford
Eric Brewe
Adrienne Traxler
author_sort Kelley Commeford
title Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations
title_short Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations
title_full Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations
title_fullStr Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations
title_sort characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and classroom observations
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2e03c7c8dd2c4a8184525f82a3234817
work_keys_str_mv AT kelleycommeford characterizingactivelearningenvironmentsinphysicsusingnetworkanalysisandclassroomobservations
AT ericbrewe characterizingactivelearningenvironmentsinphysicsusingnetworkanalysisandclassroomobservations
AT adriennetraxler characterizingactivelearningenvironmentsinphysicsusingnetworkanalysisandclassroomobservations
_version_ 1718417484306972672