A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery

Yoshikatsu Hosoda, Shoji Kuriyama, Yoko Jingami, Hidetsugu Hattori, Hisako Hayashi, Miho Matsumoto Department of Ophthalmology, Otsu Red-Cross Hospital, Otsu, Japan Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the level of patient pain during the phacoemulsification and implantation of foldab...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosoda Y, Kuriyama S, Jingami Y, Hattori H, Hayashi H, Matsumoto M
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2e1cb3e030584bd3b0bed29d43f0ff5a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2e1cb3e030584bd3b0bed29d43f0ff5a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2e1cb3e030584bd3b0bed29d43f0ff5a2021-12-02T06:38:37ZA comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/2e1cb3e030584bd3b0bed29d43f0ff5a2016-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-of-patient-pain-and-visual-outcome-using-topical-anesthes-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Yoshikatsu Hosoda, Shoji Kuriyama, Yoko Jingami, Hidetsugu Hattori, Hisako Hayashi, Miho Matsumoto Department of Ophthalmology, Otsu Red-Cross Hospital, Otsu, Japan Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the level of patient pain during the phacoemulsification and implantation of foldable intraocular lenses while under topical, intracameral, or sub-Tenon lidocaine.Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study. Three hundred and one eyes subjected to cataract surgery were included in this study. All eyes underwent phacoemulsification surgery and intraocular lens implantation using topical, sub-Tenon, or intracameral anesthesia. The topical group received 4% lidocaine drops, and the intracameral group received a 0.1–0.2 cc infusion of 1% preservative-free lidocaine into the anterior chamber through the side port combined with topical drops of lidocaine. The sub-Tenon group received 2% lidocaine. Best-corrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell loss, and intraoperative pain level were evaluated. Pain level was assessed on a visual analog scale (range 0–2).Results: There were no significant differences in visual outcome and corneal endothelial cell loss between the three groups. The mean pain score in the sub-Tenon group was significantly lower than that in the topical and intracameral groups (P=0.0009 and P=0.0055, respectively). In 250 eyes without high myopia (<-6D), there were no significant differences in mean pain score between the sub-Tenon and intracameral groups (P=0.1417). No additional anesthesia was required in all groups.Conclusion: Intracameral lidocaine provides sufficient pain suppressive effects in eyes without high myopia, while sub-Tenon anesthesia is better for cataract surgery in eyes with high myopia. Keywords: cataract, anesthesia, topical, intracameral, sub-TenonHosoda YKuriyama SJingami YHattori HHayashi HMatsumoto MDove Medical Pressarticlecataractanesthesiatopicalintracameralsub-tenonOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2016, Iss Issue 1, Pp 1139-1144 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cataract
anesthesia
topical
intracameral
sub-tenon
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle cataract
anesthesia
topical
intracameral
sub-tenon
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Hosoda Y
Kuriyama S
Jingami Y
Hattori H
Hayashi H
Matsumoto M
A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery
description Yoshikatsu Hosoda, Shoji Kuriyama, Yoko Jingami, Hidetsugu Hattori, Hisako Hayashi, Miho Matsumoto Department of Ophthalmology, Otsu Red-Cross Hospital, Otsu, Japan Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the level of patient pain during the phacoemulsification and implantation of foldable intraocular lenses while under topical, intracameral, or sub-Tenon lidocaine.Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study. Three hundred and one eyes subjected to cataract surgery were included in this study. All eyes underwent phacoemulsification surgery and intraocular lens implantation using topical, sub-Tenon, or intracameral anesthesia. The topical group received 4% lidocaine drops, and the intracameral group received a 0.1–0.2 cc infusion of 1% preservative-free lidocaine into the anterior chamber through the side port combined with topical drops of lidocaine. The sub-Tenon group received 2% lidocaine. Best-corrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell loss, and intraoperative pain level were evaluated. Pain level was assessed on a visual analog scale (range 0–2).Results: There were no significant differences in visual outcome and corneal endothelial cell loss between the three groups. The mean pain score in the sub-Tenon group was significantly lower than that in the topical and intracameral groups (P=0.0009 and P=0.0055, respectively). In 250 eyes without high myopia (<-6D), there were no significant differences in mean pain score between the sub-Tenon and intracameral groups (P=0.1417). No additional anesthesia was required in all groups.Conclusion: Intracameral lidocaine provides sufficient pain suppressive effects in eyes without high myopia, while sub-Tenon anesthesia is better for cataract surgery in eyes with high myopia. Keywords: cataract, anesthesia, topical, intracameral, sub-Tenon
format article
author Hosoda Y
Kuriyama S
Jingami Y
Hattori H
Hayashi H
Matsumoto M
author_facet Hosoda Y
Kuriyama S
Jingami Y
Hattori H
Hayashi H
Matsumoto M
author_sort Hosoda Y
title A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery
title_short A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery
title_full A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery
title_fullStr A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery
title_sort comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/2e1cb3e030584bd3b0bed29d43f0ff5a
work_keys_str_mv AT hosoday acomparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT kuriyamas acomparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT jingamiy acomparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT hattorih acomparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT hayashih acomparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT matsumotom acomparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT hosoday comparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT kuriyamas comparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT jingamiy comparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT hattorih comparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT hayashih comparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
AT matsumotom comparisonofpatientpainandvisualoutcomeusingtopicalanesthesiaversusregionalanesthesiaduringcataractsurgery
_version_ 1718399803905277952