Does Systemic Methotrexate Therapy Induce Azole Resistance among Endogenous <i>Candida</i> Strains?

Background: Research confirms that <i>Candida</i> spp. incubated with methotrexate develop multi-drug resistance to azoles, but it is not clear whether this phenomenon occurs in vivo in patients treated with cytostatics. The aim of the study was to assess whether systemic methotrexate th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dawid Żyrek, Joanna Nowicka, Magdalena Pajączkowska, Ewa Morgiel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2e8b0da00464485dbf8b0b20901005fd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2e8b0da00464485dbf8b0b20901005fd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2e8b0da00464485dbf8b0b20901005fd2021-11-25T16:22:23ZDoes Systemic Methotrexate Therapy Induce Azole Resistance among Endogenous <i>Candida</i> Strains?10.3390/antibiotics101113022079-6382https://doaj.org/article/2e8b0da00464485dbf8b0b20901005fd2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/11/1302https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382Background: Research confirms that <i>Candida</i> spp. incubated with methotrexate develop multi-drug resistance to azoles, but it is not clear whether this phenomenon occurs in vivo in patients treated with cytostatics. The aim of the study was to assess whether systemic methotrexate therapy induces resistance to azoles among endogenous <i>Candida</i> strains in patients with rheumatological diseases. Methods: The test group consisted of 52 rheumatological patients on methotrexate therapy, who have never been exposed to fluconazole. The control group was composed of 49 individuals who have never been exposed to either methotrexate or fluconazole. Oral swab and clinical information were obtained from each participant. The acquired material was cultured, then each strain was isolated and identified (MALDI TOF). Subsequently, minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for fluconazole was determined. Results: MIC values ranged from <0.125 to 64 µg/mL with the most common result <0.125 µg/mL. Samples obtained from 4 patients of the test group and 2 patients of the control group contained strains resistant to fluconazole. Conclusions: Despite slightly higher incidence of fluconazole-resistant strains among patients on systemic methotrexate therapy, we found no solid evidence to support the hypothesis that methotrexate induces resistance to azoles among endogenous <i>Candida</i> strains in patients with rheumatological diseases.Dawid ŻyrekJoanna NowickaMagdalena PajączkowskaEwa MorgielMDPI AGarticle<i>Candida</i>cross-resistancemethotrexatefluconazoleTherapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950ENAntibiotics, Vol 10, Iss 1302, p 1302 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic <i>Candida</i>
cross-resistance
methotrexate
fluconazole
Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
spellingShingle <i>Candida</i>
cross-resistance
methotrexate
fluconazole
Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
Dawid Żyrek
Joanna Nowicka
Magdalena Pajączkowska
Ewa Morgiel
Does Systemic Methotrexate Therapy Induce Azole Resistance among Endogenous <i>Candida</i> Strains?
description Background: Research confirms that <i>Candida</i> spp. incubated with methotrexate develop multi-drug resistance to azoles, but it is not clear whether this phenomenon occurs in vivo in patients treated with cytostatics. The aim of the study was to assess whether systemic methotrexate therapy induces resistance to azoles among endogenous <i>Candida</i> strains in patients with rheumatological diseases. Methods: The test group consisted of 52 rheumatological patients on methotrexate therapy, who have never been exposed to fluconazole. The control group was composed of 49 individuals who have never been exposed to either methotrexate or fluconazole. Oral swab and clinical information were obtained from each participant. The acquired material was cultured, then each strain was isolated and identified (MALDI TOF). Subsequently, minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for fluconazole was determined. Results: MIC values ranged from <0.125 to 64 µg/mL with the most common result <0.125 µg/mL. Samples obtained from 4 patients of the test group and 2 patients of the control group contained strains resistant to fluconazole. Conclusions: Despite slightly higher incidence of fluconazole-resistant strains among patients on systemic methotrexate therapy, we found no solid evidence to support the hypothesis that methotrexate induces resistance to azoles among endogenous <i>Candida</i> strains in patients with rheumatological diseases.
format article
author Dawid Żyrek
Joanna Nowicka
Magdalena Pajączkowska
Ewa Morgiel
author_facet Dawid Żyrek
Joanna Nowicka
Magdalena Pajączkowska
Ewa Morgiel
author_sort Dawid Żyrek
title Does Systemic Methotrexate Therapy Induce Azole Resistance among Endogenous <i>Candida</i> Strains?
title_short Does Systemic Methotrexate Therapy Induce Azole Resistance among Endogenous <i>Candida</i> Strains?
title_full Does Systemic Methotrexate Therapy Induce Azole Resistance among Endogenous <i>Candida</i> Strains?
title_fullStr Does Systemic Methotrexate Therapy Induce Azole Resistance among Endogenous <i>Candida</i> Strains?
title_full_unstemmed Does Systemic Methotrexate Therapy Induce Azole Resistance among Endogenous <i>Candida</i> Strains?
title_sort does systemic methotrexate therapy induce azole resistance among endogenous <i>candida</i> strains?
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2e8b0da00464485dbf8b0b20901005fd
work_keys_str_mv AT dawidzyrek doessystemicmethotrexatetherapyinduceazoleresistanceamongendogenousicandidaistrains
AT joannanowicka doessystemicmethotrexatetherapyinduceazoleresistanceamongendogenousicandidaistrains
AT magdalenapajaczkowska doessystemicmethotrexatetherapyinduceazoleresistanceamongendogenousicandidaistrains
AT ewamorgiel doessystemicmethotrexatetherapyinduceazoleresistanceamongendogenousicandidaistrains
_version_ 1718413190116671488