Face Coverings, Aerosol Dispersion and Mitigation of Virus Transmission Risk

The SARS-CoV-2 virus is primarily transmitted through virus-laden fluid particles ejected from the mouth of infected people. Face covers can mitigate the risk of virus transmission but their outward effectiveness is not fully ascertained. <italic>Objective:</italic> by using a background...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Ignazio Maria Viola, Brian Peterson, Gabriele Pisetta, Geethanjali Pavar, Hibbah Akhtar, Filippo Menoloascina, Enzo Mangano, Katherine E. Dunn, Roman Gabl, Alex Nila, Emanuela Molinari, Cathal Cummins, Gerard Thompson, Tsz-Yan Milly Lo, Fiona C. Denison, Paul Digard, Omair Malik, Mark J. G. Dunn, Catherine M. McDougall, Felicity V. Mehendale
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: IEEE 2021
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/2efcee0d775a4c3aba1b7dfa01747d71
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
Description
Résumé:The SARS-CoV-2 virus is primarily transmitted through virus-laden fluid particles ejected from the mouth of infected people. Face covers can mitigate the risk of virus transmission but their outward effectiveness is not fully ascertained. <italic>Objective:</italic> by using a background oriented schlieren technique, we aim to investigate the air flow ejected by a person while quietly and heavily breathing, while coughing, and with different face covers. <italic>Results:</italic> we found that all face covers without an outlet valve reduce the front flow through by at least 63% and perhaps as high as 86% if the unfiltered cough jet distance was resolved to the anticipated maximum distance of 2-3 m. However, surgical and handmade masks, and face shields, generate significant leakage jets that may present major hazards. <italic>Conclusions:</italic> the effectiveness of the masks should mostly be considered based on the generation of secondary jets rather than on the ability to mitigate the front throughflow.