CAT Tools Usability Test with Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging: Where Translation Studies Meets Natural Language Processing

Computer assisted tools used to seem as though not made from the point of view of their targeted users [O’Brien, 2012:15]. However, their usability has been improving. In Translation Studies there exists a gap in research on process-oriented usability involving data triangulation. In our study base...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Olga Witczak, Rafał Jaworski
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR PL
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2018
Materias:	translation studies usability research CAT tools natural language processing eye-tracking Translating and interpreting P306-310
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2efef0936dc64778b772258810cfed9e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2efef0936dc64778b772258810cfed9e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2efef0936dc64778b772258810cfed9e2021-11-27T13:05:19ZCAT Tools Usability Test with Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging: Where Translation Studies Meets Natural Language Processing10.12797/MOaP.24.2018.41.031689-91212391-6745https://doaj.org/article/2efef0936dc64778b772258810cfed9e2018-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/moap/article/view/223https://doaj.org/toc/1689-9121https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6745 Computer assisted tools used to seem as though not made from the point of view of their targeted users [O’Brien, 2012:15]. However, their usability has been improving. In Translation Studies there exists a gap in research on process-oriented usability involving data triangulation. In our study based on the assumption that translation is a situated and complex activity [Risku, 2002, 2004], we aimed to address this gap with our experiment testing a new tool for translators, Concordia. This usability experiment with eye-tracking, keylogging, and screen recording directly involved translators (six translation trainees) in the development process through objectively collected data on effectiveness and efficiency of Concordia. Their satisfaction with Concordia was also a part of the usability test. We hypothesised that participants would be more efficient and effective when translating European Union texts with Concordia and that they will be satisfied with the tool. The results indicate that Concordia at its current state of development does not facilitate the process, but the participants were generally satisfied with the tool’s features. Olga WitczakRafał JaworskiKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticletranslation studiesusability researchCAT toolsnatural language processingeye-trackingTranslating and interpretingP306-310ENFRPLMiędzy Oryginałem a Przekładem, Vol 24, Iss 3 (41) (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR PL
topic	translation studies usability research CAT tools natural language processing eye-tracking Translating and interpreting P306-310
spellingShingle	translation studies usability research CAT tools natural language processing eye-tracking Translating and interpreting P306-310 Olga Witczak Rafał Jaworski CAT Tools Usability Test with Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging: Where Translation Studies Meets Natural Language Processing
description	Computer assisted tools used to seem as though not made from the point of view of their targeted users [O’Brien, 2012:15]. However, their usability has been improving. In Translation Studies there exists a gap in research on process-oriented usability involving data triangulation. In our study based on the assumption that translation is a situated and complex activity [Risku, 2002, 2004], we aimed to address this gap with our experiment testing a new tool for translators, Concordia. This usability experiment with eye-tracking, keylogging, and screen recording directly involved translators (six translation trainees) in the development process through objectively collected data on effectiveness and efficiency of Concordia. Their satisfaction with Concordia was also a part of the usability test. We hypothesised that participants would be more efficient and effective when translating European Union texts with Concordia and that they will be satisfied with the tool. The results indicate that Concordia at its current state of development does not facilitate the process, but the participants were generally satisfied with the tool’s features.
format	article
author	Olga Witczak Rafał Jaworski
author_facet	Olga Witczak Rafał Jaworski
author_sort	Olga Witczak
title	CAT Tools Usability Test with Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging: Where Translation Studies Meets Natural Language Processing
title_short	CAT Tools Usability Test with Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging: Where Translation Studies Meets Natural Language Processing
title_full	CAT Tools Usability Test with Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging: Where Translation Studies Meets Natural Language Processing
title_fullStr	CAT Tools Usability Test with Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging: Where Translation Studies Meets Natural Language Processing
title_full_unstemmed	CAT Tools Usability Test with Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging: Where Translation Studies Meets Natural Language Processing
title_sort	cat tools usability test with eye-tracking and key-logging: where translation studies meets natural language processing
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/2efef0936dc64778b772258810cfed9e
work_keys_str_mv	AT olgawitczak cattoolsusabilitytestwitheyetrackingandkeyloggingwheretranslationstudiesmeetsnaturallanguageprocessing AT rafałjaworski cattoolsusabilitytestwitheyetrackingandkeyloggingwheretranslationstudiesmeetsnaturallanguageprocessing
_version_	1718408732106293248

CAT Tools Usability Test with Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging: Where Translation Studies Meets Natural Language Processing

Ejemplares similares