Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community

(1) Background: This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge and the perceptions of speech pathology held by a sample of regional mental health practitioners and to explore factors that facilitate understanding of the roles of speech pathologists in mental health. While mental health is reco...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tina Janes, Tania Signal, Barbra Zupan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2f1d04fc82164390b26f5035bca8ef24
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2f1d04fc82164390b26f5035bca8ef24
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2f1d04fc82164390b26f5035bca8ef242021-11-25T17:44:38ZMental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community10.3390/healthcare91114852227-9032https://doaj.org/article/2f1d04fc82164390b26f5035bca8ef242021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/11/1485https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9032(1) Background: This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge and the perceptions of speech pathology held by a sample of regional mental health practitioners and to explore factors that facilitate understanding of the roles of speech pathologists in mental health. While mental health is recognised as an area of practice by Speech Pathology Australia, the inclusion of speech pathologists in mental health teams is limited. (2) Methods: An anonymous online survey was created using previously validated surveys and author generated questions and distributed to mental health practitioners in Central Queensland, Australia. (3) Results: Mental health practitioners had difficulty identifying speech pathology involvement when presented with case scenarios. Accuracy was poor for language-based cases, ranging from 28.81% to 37.29%. Participants who reported having worked with a speech pathologist were more likely to demonstrate higher scores on the areas of practice questions, [<i>r</i>(53) = 0.301, <i>p</i> = 0.028], and the language scenarios [<i>r</i>(58) = 0.506, <i>p</i> < 0.001]. They were also more likely to agree to statements regarding the connection between speech pathology and mental health, <i>r</i>(59) = 0.527, <i>p</i> < 0.001. (4) Conclusions: As found in this study, contact with speech pathologists is a strong predictor of mental health providers’ knowledge of the speech pathology profession. Thus, the challenge may be to increase this contact with mental health providers to promote inclusion of speech pathologists in the mental health domain.Tina JanesTania SignalBarbra ZupanMDPI AGarticlecommunicationmental healthawareness of speech pathologyMedicineRENHealthcare, Vol 9, Iss 1485, p 1485 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic communication
mental health
awareness of speech pathology
Medicine
R
spellingShingle communication
mental health
awareness of speech pathology
Medicine
R
Tina Janes
Tania Signal
Barbra Zupan
Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
description (1) Background: This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge and the perceptions of speech pathology held by a sample of regional mental health practitioners and to explore factors that facilitate understanding of the roles of speech pathologists in mental health. While mental health is recognised as an area of practice by Speech Pathology Australia, the inclusion of speech pathologists in mental health teams is limited. (2) Methods: An anonymous online survey was created using previously validated surveys and author generated questions and distributed to mental health practitioners in Central Queensland, Australia. (3) Results: Mental health practitioners had difficulty identifying speech pathology involvement when presented with case scenarios. Accuracy was poor for language-based cases, ranging from 28.81% to 37.29%. Participants who reported having worked with a speech pathologist were more likely to demonstrate higher scores on the areas of practice questions, [<i>r</i>(53) = 0.301, <i>p</i> = 0.028], and the language scenarios [<i>r</i>(58) = 0.506, <i>p</i> < 0.001]. They were also more likely to agree to statements regarding the connection between speech pathology and mental health, <i>r</i>(59) = 0.527, <i>p</i> < 0.001. (4) Conclusions: As found in this study, contact with speech pathologists is a strong predictor of mental health providers’ knowledge of the speech pathology profession. Thus, the challenge may be to increase this contact with mental health providers to promote inclusion of speech pathologists in the mental health domain.
format article
author Tina Janes
Tania Signal
Barbra Zupan
author_facet Tina Janes
Tania Signal
Barbra Zupan
author_sort Tina Janes
title Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_short Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_full Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_fullStr Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_full_unstemmed Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_sort mental health practitioners’ understanding of speech pathology in a regional australian community
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2f1d04fc82164390b26f5035bca8ef24
work_keys_str_mv AT tinajanes mentalhealthpractitionersunderstandingofspeechpathologyinaregionalaustraliancommunity
AT taniasignal mentalhealthpractitionersunderstandingofspeechpathologyinaregionalaustraliancommunity
AT barbrazupan mentalhealthpractitionersunderstandingofspeechpathologyinaregionalaustraliancommunity
_version_ 1718412034547122176