ECG Monitoring Based on Dynamic Compressed Sensing of Multi-Lead Signals
This paper presents an innovative method for multiple lead electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring based on Compressed Sensing (CS). The proposed method extends to multiple leads signals, a dynamic Compressed Sensing method, that were previously developed on a single lead. The dynamic sensing method make...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2f1f09ecea2e4f7d892e492ee8eec8bb |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Sumario: | This paper presents an innovative method for multiple lead electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring based on Compressed Sensing (CS). The proposed method extends to multiple leads signals, a dynamic Compressed Sensing method, that were previously developed on a single lead. The dynamic sensing method makes use of a sensing matrix in which its elements are dynamically obtained from the signal to be compressed. In this method, for the application to multiple leads, it is proposed to use a single sensing matrix for which its elements are obtained from a combination of multiple leads. The proposed method is evaluated on a wide set of signals and acquired on healthy subjects and on subjects affected by different pathologies, such as myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, and bundle branch block. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method can be adopted for a Compression Ratio (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>C</mi><mi>R</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) up to 10, without compromising signal quality. In particular, for <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>C</mi><mi>R</mi><mo>=</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> 10, it exhibits a percentage of root-mean-squared difference average among a wide set of ECG signals lower than 3%. |
---|