Pregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (Ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje

For successful large carnivore conservation it is important to understand mechanisms how large carnivores adapt to human presence, including anthropogenic environmental modifications. Widespread Holarctic distribution throughout various levels of human-use makes the brown bear (Ursus arctos...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Maja Mohorović, Miha Krofel, Klemen Jerina
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN ES FR SL
Publicado:	Slovenian Forestry Institute 2017
Materias:	Forestry SD1-669.5 Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2f284ffbe9314cb48164e6b7f8ba6083
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2f284ffbe9314cb48164e6b7f8ba6083
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2f284ffbe9314cb48164e6b7f8ba60832021-11-15T12:34:45ZPregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (Ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje2335-31122335-395310.20315/ASetL.113.2https://doaj.org/article/2f284ffbe9314cb48164e6b7f8ba60832017-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=8102https://doaj.org/toc/2335-3112https://doaj.org/toc/2335-3953 For successful large carnivore conservation it is important to understand mechanisms how large carnivores adapt to human presence, including anthropogenic environmental modifications. Widespread Holarctic distribution throughout various levels of human-use makes the brown bear (Ursus arctos) an appropriate model species for studying response to anthropogenic effects in large carnivores. We reviewed the literature throughout entire species% range to examine how bears modify their habitat use in response to the intensity of anthropogenic modifications of their environment. Results indicate that bears in general avoid human structures, with strongest avoidance observed for permanently inhabited areas and high-traffic roads. We observed their stronger avoidance of human structures in areas with higher human population densities. Comparison between Europe and North America indicate stronger avoidance of urban areas among European bears, while no obvious differences were observed for other types of anthropogenic infrastructure. We suggest caution when comparing responses among study areas, because most bear habitat-use studies reported only relative habitat selection (i.e. use relative to the availability) and there is lack of reported data on absolute habitat use. Therefore we recommend analysis of original data across the species' range in order to advance our understanding of bear habitat-use across a gradient of intensity of human disturbance.Maja MohorovićMiha KrofelKlemen JerinaSlovenian Forestry InstitutearticleForestrySD1-669.5Environmental sciencesGE1-350DEENESFRSLActa Silvae et Ligni, Vol 113, Pp 15-28 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN ES FR SL
topic	Forestry SD1-669.5 Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	Forestry SD1-669.5 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Maja Mohorović Miha Krofel Klemen Jerina Pregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (Ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje
description	For successful large carnivore conservation it is important to understand mechanisms how large carnivores adapt to human presence, including anthropogenic environmental modifications. Widespread Holarctic distribution throughout various levels of human-use makes the brown bear (Ursus arctos) an appropriate model species for studying response to anthropogenic effects in large carnivores. We reviewed the literature throughout entire species% range to examine how bears modify their habitat use in response to the intensity of anthropogenic modifications of their environment. Results indicate that bears in general avoid human structures, with strongest avoidance observed for permanently inhabited areas and high-traffic roads. We observed their stronger avoidance of human structures in areas with higher human population densities. Comparison between Europe and North America indicate stronger avoidance of urban areas among European bears, while no obvious differences were observed for other types of anthropogenic infrastructure. We suggest caution when comparing responses among study areas, because most bear habitat-use studies reported only relative habitat selection (i.e. use relative to the availability) and there is lack of reported data on absolute habitat use. Therefore we recommend analysis of original data across the species' range in order to advance our understanding of bear habitat-use across a gradient of intensity of human disturbance.
format	article
author	Maja Mohorović Miha Krofel Klemen Jerina
author_facet	Maja Mohorović Miha Krofel Klemen Jerina
author_sort	Maja Mohorović
title	Pregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (Ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje
title_short	Pregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (Ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje
title_full	Pregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (Ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje
title_fullStr	Pregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (Ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje
title_full_unstemmed	Pregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (Ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje
title_sort	pregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje
publisher	Slovenian Forestry Institute
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/2f284ffbe9314cb48164e6b7f8ba6083
work_keys_str_mv	AT majamohorovic pregledprilagajanjarabeprostorarjavegamedvedaursusarctosnaantropogenemotnje AT mihakrofel pregledprilagajanjarabeprostorarjavegamedvedaursusarctosnaantropogenemotnje AT klemenjerina pregledprilagajanjarabeprostorarjavegamedvedaursusarctosnaantropogenemotnje
_version_	1718428424210481152

Pregled prilagajanja rabe prostora rjavega medveda (Ursus arctos) na antropogene motnje

Ejemplares similares