Reconciling Rights and Obligations

This article examines the debate concerning the recent reinstatement of Shari`ah law with respect to criminal matters in Northern Nigeria. The discussion explores the inherent challenges in reconciling the equally entrenched and passionate views of pro-Shari`ah supporters on their right to freedom...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pernille Ironside
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2f471bbea0d247e0ade2b1bb94ca80a4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2f471bbea0d247e0ade2b1bb94ca80a4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2f471bbea0d247e0ade2b1bb94ca80a42021-12-02T17:26:16ZReconciling Rights and Obligations10.35632/ajis.v20i3-4.5282690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/2f471bbea0d247e0ade2b1bb94ca80a42003-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/528https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 This article examines the debate concerning the recent reinstatement of Shari`ah law with respect to criminal matters in Northern Nigeria. The discussion explores the inherent challenges in reconciling the equally entrenched and passionate views of pro-Shari`ah supporters on their right to freedom of religion with those that question its application in terms of human rights norms and obligations, and its constitutional legality. The analysis concludes that Shari`ah laws can coexist with Nigeria’s common law system and remain relevant in the context of Islam, provided that its principles are adapted and modernized to comport with international standards for due process and are interpreted and applied consistently. Pernille IronsideInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 20, Iss 3-4 (2003)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Pernille Ironside
Reconciling Rights and Obligations
description This article examines the debate concerning the recent reinstatement of Shari`ah law with respect to criminal matters in Northern Nigeria. The discussion explores the inherent challenges in reconciling the equally entrenched and passionate views of pro-Shari`ah supporters on their right to freedom of religion with those that question its application in terms of human rights norms and obligations, and its constitutional legality. The analysis concludes that Shari`ah laws can coexist with Nigeria’s common law system and remain relevant in the context of Islam, provided that its principles are adapted and modernized to comport with international standards for due process and are interpreted and applied consistently.
format article
author Pernille Ironside
author_facet Pernille Ironside
author_sort Pernille Ironside
title Reconciling Rights and Obligations
title_short Reconciling Rights and Obligations
title_full Reconciling Rights and Obligations
title_fullStr Reconciling Rights and Obligations
title_full_unstemmed Reconciling Rights and Obligations
title_sort reconciling rights and obligations
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2003
url https://doaj.org/article/2f471bbea0d247e0ade2b1bb94ca80a4
work_keys_str_mv AT pernilleironside reconcilingrightsandobligations
_version_ 1718380839779172352