Ostrich population densities and temporal dynamics in coupled social-ecological systems: Suitable indicators for the ecological effectiveness of protected areas?

Assessing the ecological effectiveness of protected areas is a high priority in conservation biology and requires suitable indicators. Instead of using multiple species, single species can potentially be used as indicators to assess if conservation efforts are effective in maintaining species over t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alisha N. Griffin, John Kioko, Ole Theisinger, Christian Kiffner
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2f4cf83f03254d319647d6f463b55992
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2f4cf83f03254d319647d6f463b55992
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2f4cf83f03254d319647d6f463b559922021-12-01T04:43:37ZOstrich population densities and temporal dynamics in coupled social-ecological systems: Suitable indicators for the ecological effectiveness of protected areas?1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107348https://doaj.org/article/2f4cf83f03254d319647d6f463b559922021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21000133https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XAssessing the ecological effectiveness of protected areas is a high priority in conservation biology and requires suitable indicators. Instead of using multiple species, single species can potentially be used as indicators to assess if conservation efforts are effective in maintaining species over time. Here, we assessed the suitability of ostrich (Struthio camelus massaicus) population densities and trends over time as indicators for the ecological effectiveness of four study areas (two national parks, a pastoral area, and a game-controlled area with manifold human impacts) in the Tarangire-Manyara ecosystem of northern Tanzania. Based on road transect surveys from 2011 to 2019, we estimated area- and season-specific population densities in a distance sampling framework and estimated temporal changes using generalized linear mixed models. Ostrich population densities and population trends over time were not associated with formal protection status. Ostriches in one national park occurred at highest densities and were constant over time, while densities were low in another national park and apparently declined over time. Ostriches in the pastoral area had the second-highest mean population density, while remaining constant over time. The study area with the highest human impact had lowest ostrich densities and a seemingly declining trend over time. Ostrich densities were positively correlated with time-matched population density estimates of nine out of ten ungulate species in the same study areas, suggesting that ostrich population densities broadly reflect those of large savanna mammals in this ecosystem. However, site-specific ostrich population trends over time were not closely correlated with trends of common large mammal species. Therefore, ostrich population densities appear as suitable management indicators to assess the broad ecological effectiveness of protected areas. However, ostrich population trajectories do not appear suitable as indicator surrogate to monitor trends of mammal populations over time.Alisha N. GriffinJohn KiokoOle TheisingerChristian KiffnerElsevierarticleConservation effectivenessIndicator speciesMonitoringPopulation dynamicsTarangire-Manyara ecosystemWildlife managementEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 125, Iss , Pp 107348- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Conservation effectiveness
Indicator species
Monitoring
Population dynamics
Tarangire-Manyara ecosystem
Wildlife management
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Conservation effectiveness
Indicator species
Monitoring
Population dynamics
Tarangire-Manyara ecosystem
Wildlife management
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Alisha N. Griffin
John Kioko
Ole Theisinger
Christian Kiffner
Ostrich population densities and temporal dynamics in coupled social-ecological systems: Suitable indicators for the ecological effectiveness of protected areas?
description Assessing the ecological effectiveness of protected areas is a high priority in conservation biology and requires suitable indicators. Instead of using multiple species, single species can potentially be used as indicators to assess if conservation efforts are effective in maintaining species over time. Here, we assessed the suitability of ostrich (Struthio camelus massaicus) population densities and trends over time as indicators for the ecological effectiveness of four study areas (two national parks, a pastoral area, and a game-controlled area with manifold human impacts) in the Tarangire-Manyara ecosystem of northern Tanzania. Based on road transect surveys from 2011 to 2019, we estimated area- and season-specific population densities in a distance sampling framework and estimated temporal changes using generalized linear mixed models. Ostrich population densities and population trends over time were not associated with formal protection status. Ostriches in one national park occurred at highest densities and were constant over time, while densities were low in another national park and apparently declined over time. Ostriches in the pastoral area had the second-highest mean population density, while remaining constant over time. The study area with the highest human impact had lowest ostrich densities and a seemingly declining trend over time. Ostrich densities were positively correlated with time-matched population density estimates of nine out of ten ungulate species in the same study areas, suggesting that ostrich population densities broadly reflect those of large savanna mammals in this ecosystem. However, site-specific ostrich population trends over time were not closely correlated with trends of common large mammal species. Therefore, ostrich population densities appear as suitable management indicators to assess the broad ecological effectiveness of protected areas. However, ostrich population trajectories do not appear suitable as indicator surrogate to monitor trends of mammal populations over time.
format article
author Alisha N. Griffin
John Kioko
Ole Theisinger
Christian Kiffner
author_facet Alisha N. Griffin
John Kioko
Ole Theisinger
Christian Kiffner
author_sort Alisha N. Griffin
title Ostrich population densities and temporal dynamics in coupled social-ecological systems: Suitable indicators for the ecological effectiveness of protected areas?
title_short Ostrich population densities and temporal dynamics in coupled social-ecological systems: Suitable indicators for the ecological effectiveness of protected areas?
title_full Ostrich population densities and temporal dynamics in coupled social-ecological systems: Suitable indicators for the ecological effectiveness of protected areas?
title_fullStr Ostrich population densities and temporal dynamics in coupled social-ecological systems: Suitable indicators for the ecological effectiveness of protected areas?
title_full_unstemmed Ostrich population densities and temporal dynamics in coupled social-ecological systems: Suitable indicators for the ecological effectiveness of protected areas?
title_sort ostrich population densities and temporal dynamics in coupled social-ecological systems: suitable indicators for the ecological effectiveness of protected areas?
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2f4cf83f03254d319647d6f463b55992
work_keys_str_mv AT alishangriffin ostrichpopulationdensitiesandtemporaldynamicsincoupledsocialecologicalsystemssuitableindicatorsfortheecologicaleffectivenessofprotectedareas
AT johnkioko ostrichpopulationdensitiesandtemporaldynamicsincoupledsocialecologicalsystemssuitableindicatorsfortheecologicaleffectivenessofprotectedareas
AT oletheisinger ostrichpopulationdensitiesandtemporaldynamicsincoupledsocialecologicalsystemssuitableindicatorsfortheecologicaleffectivenessofprotectedareas
AT christiankiffner ostrichpopulationdensitiesandtemporaldynamicsincoupledsocialecologicalsystemssuitableindicatorsfortheecologicaleffectivenessofprotectedareas
_version_ 1718405769457565696