A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes

Background: Diabetes is seen to be associated with increased rate of failure of implants. The implant failure can be categorized as ailing, failing, and failed implants. The review of literature did not form any consensus on the effect of diabetes on the implant success rates. The reason we found wa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rafat Sultana, Amit Raj, Wagisha Barbi, Shakeb Khan Afridi, Bibhu Prasad Mishra, Rajvir Malik
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	ailing implants controlled diabetes dental implants diabetes failed implants failing implants implant failure type i diabetes type ii diabetes uncontrolled diabetes Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2f759a3c70894e22a0572c13e6913463
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2f759a3c70894e22a0572c13e6913463
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2f759a3c70894e22a0572c13e69134632021-11-19T12:15:53ZA comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_229_21https://doaj.org/article/2f759a3c70894e22a0572c13e69134632021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1410;epage=1413;aulast=Sultanahttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Background: Diabetes is seen to be associated with increased rate of failure of implants. The implant failure can be categorized as ailing, failing, and failed implants. The review of literature did not form any consensus on the effect of diabetes on the implant success rates. The reason we found was many confounding factors and nonconsideration of glycemic status of diabetic patients. Hence, in our study, we eliminated the confounding factors and took glycemic index in consideration. Materials and Methods: Forty-six participants were included in this study, out of which 26 were nondiabetic and 20 diabetic. Diabetics were further divided into two groups based on the HBA1C values, as controlled and uncontrolled diabetics. Results: We found that the uncontrolled diabetics had highest rate of implant failure as compared to other two groups. Furthermore, the controlled diabetics and nondiabetics had similar implant successes and failure rates. Conclusion: This suggests that controlled diabetics are comparable to nondiabetics in terms of implant success rates.Rafat SultanaAmit RajWagisha BarbiShakeb Khan AfridiBibhu Prasad MishraRajvir MalikWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticleailing implantscontrolled diabetesdental implantsdiabetesfailed implantsfailing implantsimplant failuretype i diabetestype ii diabetesuncontrolled diabetesPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1410-1413 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	ailing implants controlled diabetes dental implants diabetes failed implants failing implants implant failure type i diabetes type ii diabetes uncontrolled diabetes Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	ailing implants controlled diabetes dental implants diabetes failed implants failing implants implant failure type i diabetes type ii diabetes uncontrolled diabetes Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Rafat Sultana Amit Raj Wagisha Barbi Shakeb Khan Afridi Bibhu Prasad Mishra Rajvir Malik A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
description	Background: Diabetes is seen to be associated with increased rate of failure of implants. The implant failure can be categorized as ailing, failing, and failed implants. The review of literature did not form any consensus on the effect of diabetes on the implant success rates. The reason we found was many confounding factors and nonconsideration of glycemic status of diabetic patients. Hence, in our study, we eliminated the confounding factors and took glycemic index in consideration. Materials and Methods: Forty-six participants were included in this study, out of which 26 were nondiabetic and 20 diabetic. Diabetics were further divided into two groups based on the HBA1C values, as controlled and uncontrolled diabetics. Results: We found that the uncontrolled diabetics had highest rate of implant failure as compared to other two groups. Furthermore, the controlled diabetics and nondiabetics had similar implant successes and failure rates. Conclusion: This suggests that controlled diabetics are comparable to nondiabetics in terms of implant success rates.
format	article
author	Rafat Sultana Amit Raj Wagisha Barbi Shakeb Khan Afridi Bibhu Prasad Mishra Rajvir Malik
author_facet	Rafat Sultana Amit Raj Wagisha Barbi Shakeb Khan Afridi Bibhu Prasad Mishra Rajvir Malik
author_sort	Rafat Sultana
title	A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_short	A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_full	A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_fullStr	A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_full_unstemmed	A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_sort	comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/2f759a3c70894e22a0572c13e6913463
work_keys_str_mv	AT rafatsultana acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT amitraj acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT wagishabarbi acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT shakebkhanafridi acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT bibhuprasadmishra acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT rajvirmalik acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT rafatsultana comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT amitraj comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT wagishabarbi comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT shakebkhanafridi comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT bibhuprasadmishra comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes AT rajvirmalik comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
_version_	1718420121964249088

A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes

Ejemplares similares