DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES IN DESIGN STUDIO

Purpose In the architectural design studio education, series of approaches, such as vertical, traditional, constructivist or virtual, are executed. In this research, an experiment was executed with the aim of revealing the effects of different architectural design studio approaches through the com...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Begüm Erçevik Sönmez
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design 2020
Materias:	Architectural design design education design studio educational approaches Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2f7aac81e3df48b6b1984a0f729582b2
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2f7aac81e3df48b6b1984a0f729582b2
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2f7aac81e3df48b6b1984a0f729582b22021-11-07T06:21:19ZDIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES IN DESIGN STUDIO10.15320/ICONARP.2020.1342147-9380https://doaj.org/article/2f7aac81e3df48b6b1984a0f729582b22020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/447https://doaj.org/toc/2147-9380 Purpose In the architectural design studio education, series of approaches, such as vertical, traditional, constructivist or virtual, are executed. In this research, an experiment was executed with the aim of revealing the effects of different architectural design studio approaches through the comparisons of student assessments. The study was based on the research question related to which of the approaches applied in the architectural design studio is the successful and productive one. The research hypothesized that in architectural design education, the independent design studio approach is more successful than the controlled studio approach. Design/Methodology/Approach Two different approaches were compared. The independent studio approach, in which students studied freely in studio milieu, was applied full-time 9 hours a week session in the Fall Semester. The controlled design studio approach, executed as two half days per week in the Spring Semester, proceeded with the desk critiques in a group supervised by an instructor. At the end of each semester a questionnaire that evaluated each design studio approach was conducted to 44 third-year design studio students. Findings The controlled design studio appeared to be a more dynamic approach in which following on the critiques of the instructor was ease. The group instructor provided sufficient time to all students for the critiques, whereas in the independent studio approach, the interaction between the instructors and the students was weak. Following up the critiques of different instructors was a difficult process. The controlled design studio was found to be more successful than the independent studio approach. The hypothesis of the research is not confirmed. Research Limitations/Implications The most important limitation of this study was that the comparisons were only made through the students’ assessments, and the instructors were not included in the research. Social/Practical Implications The meetings with the instructors should be arranged twice a week to keep students under control of instructors, and to prevent the reluctance of the students in the design studio. Originality/Value This study makes a difference in comparing studio approaches and contributes to the discussions on architectural design studio education. Begüm Erçevik SönmezKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and DesignarticleArchitectural designdesign educationdesign studioeducational approachesArchitectureNA1-9428City planningHT165.5-169.9ENIconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Architectural design design education design studio educational approaches Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
spellingShingle	Architectural design design education design studio educational approaches Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9 Begüm Erçevik Sönmez DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES IN DESIGN STUDIO
description	Purpose In the architectural design studio education, series of approaches, such as vertical, traditional, constructivist or virtual, are executed. In this research, an experiment was executed with the aim of revealing the effects of different architectural design studio approaches through the comparisons of student assessments. The study was based on the research question related to which of the approaches applied in the architectural design studio is the successful and productive one. The research hypothesized that in architectural design education, the independent design studio approach is more successful than the controlled studio approach. Design/Methodology/Approach Two different approaches were compared. The independent studio approach, in which students studied freely in studio milieu, was applied full-time 9 hours a week session in the Fall Semester. The controlled design studio approach, executed as two half days per week in the Spring Semester, proceeded with the desk critiques in a group supervised by an instructor. At the end of each semester a questionnaire that evaluated each design studio approach was conducted to 44 third-year design studio students. Findings The controlled design studio appeared to be a more dynamic approach in which following on the critiques of the instructor was ease. The group instructor provided sufficient time to all students for the critiques, whereas in the independent studio approach, the interaction between the instructors and the students was weak. Following up the critiques of different instructors was a difficult process. The controlled design studio was found to be more successful than the independent studio approach. The hypothesis of the research is not confirmed. Research Limitations/Implications The most important limitation of this study was that the comparisons were only made through the students’ assessments, and the instructors were not included in the research. Social/Practical Implications The meetings with the instructors should be arranged twice a week to keep students under control of instructors, and to prevent the reluctance of the students in the design studio. Originality/Value This study makes a difference in comparing studio approaches and contributes to the discussions on architectural design studio education.
format	article
author	Begüm Erçevik Sönmez
author_facet	Begüm Erçevik Sönmez
author_sort	Begüm Erçevik Sönmez
title	DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES IN DESIGN STUDIO
title_short	DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES IN DESIGN STUDIO
title_full	DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES IN DESIGN STUDIO
title_fullStr	DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES IN DESIGN STUDIO
title_full_unstemmed	DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES IN DESIGN STUDIO
title_sort	different educational approaches in design studio
publisher	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/2f7aac81e3df48b6b1984a0f729582b2
work_keys_str_mv	AT begumerceviksonmez differenteducationalapproachesindesignstudio
_version_	1718443601573183488

DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES IN DESIGN STUDIO

Ejemplares similares